2016 General Discussion / Help

[toxic]

Can anyone find the link to the bye round winner who was deemed ineligible for having multiple teams?

 

[cdcanman]

Yeah there's no real deterrent for cheats if that's the process. Removing a lower ranked team and leaving our cheat with a shot at $50K is not exactly a punishment.

I'll continue to inquire

The "Age" mite be interested in the outcome

why did the team that won one of the bye rounds lose his prize that week completely if the overall runs by a different set of rules?

Seems made up on the run to me

Probably already had discussions with him about writing a column for them next year. Don't want to derail all of their prep work

 

[toxic]

Probably already had discussions with him about writing a column for them next year. Don't want to derail all of their prep work

It'll be derailed shortly

 

[cdcanman]

It'll be derailed shortly

I love your determination Tox

 

[clogwearer]

I'll continue to inquire

The "Age" mite be interested in the outcome

why did the team that won one of the bye rounds lose his prize that week completely if the overall runs by a different set of rules?

Seems made up on the run to me

I think that line of inquiry is worth pursuing. A lot of people put a lot of effort into their single teams each year, and do so under the impression that there's a level playing field. Allowing an owner of multiple teams to take any prize completely undermines that.

The only way I can see it working for them is if they allow the non-removed team to continue playing but also make it ineligible for any prizes. Like the Brownlow.

 

[SC fish]

...both teams should be removed completely

agreed

 

[Here2tellyouwhy]

Can anyone find the link to the bye round winner who was deemed ineligible for having multiple teams?

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/round-13-discussion-mbr-1.1135630/page-104#post-45140556

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/round-13-discussion-mbr-1.1135630/page-107#post-45163722

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/round-13-discussion-mbr-1.1135630/page-107#post-45169624

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/round-13-discussion-mbr-1.1135630/page-107#post-45169736

 

[toxic]

 

[Seymour Skinner]

Super Sleuth toxic on the job.

Very dodgy if they only get rid of the lower team, on the prizes tab it clearly states that;
"you may only register and enter ONE team"

 

[toxic]

Super Sleuth toxic on the job.

Very dodgy if they only get rid of the lower team, on the prizes tab it clearly states that;
"you may only register and enter ONE team"

gutsroy alerted me to it

credit to him!

 

[DaTBird187]

Well I just checked over at Supercoach Talk where Raj is a poster. His 'other team' is his wife's and registered under her email address.

 

[clogwearer]

Well I just checked over at Supercoach Talk where Raj is a poster. His 'other team' is his wife's and registered under her email address.

What about his '"other" other team'?

 

[Seymour Skinner]

Well I just checked over at Supercoach Talk where Raj is a poster. His 'other team' is his wife's and registered under her email address.

Is his wife's name Raj too?

 

[toxic]

Well I just checked over at Supercoach Talk where Raj is a poster. His 'other team' is his wife's and registered under her email address.

Think I mite visit sc talk for a 1st time

 

[toxic]

Well I just checked over at Supercoach Talk where Raj is a poster. His 'other team' is his wife's and registered under her email address.

Strangely the Hun didn't think so today and deleted ONE of his other teams

This will get massive over the next few days

 

[BC__]

Well I just checked over at Supercoach Talk where Raj is a poster. His 'other team' is his wife's and registered under her email address.

Got a link to that? Couldn't find it on their site

 

[Kadog]

Fn cheating campaigner.

 

[DaTBird187]

I'm first overall in Real Dream Team and certainly wouldn't want to lose to someone like this.

 

[toxic]

I'd encourage EVERYONE to use the "contact us" function at the bottom of the sc site page and raise your opinions of this blatant breach of the rules

 

[DT_35]

Bulls*** his wife plays Supercoach. Herald sun should call her and I bet she wouldn't even be able to name any AFL footballers, campaigner.

 

[Kadog]

Bulls*** his wife plays Supercoach. Herald sun should call her and I bet she wouldn't even be able to name any AFL footballers, campaigner.

She wouldn't even know 'she' had a team.

 

[big_bazza]

Search for the bloke on facebook there cant be any other people with that name (if its his real name) and see if he's married, if he's not then screenshot it and email it to the Hun to prove that he's talking shit.

 

[gcsunsfc]

Search for the bloke on facebook there cant be any other people with that name (if its his real name) and see if he's married, if he's not then screenshot it and email it to the Hun to prove that he's talking shit.

Because your marital status on Facebook is proof enough to take away 50k from a guy.

Ps. I believe he should be disqualified. Amateur investigations won't help get that done. They're clearly aware of the problem, they'll deal with it. If they don't disqualify him, there's nothing we can do. Their laws state they are within their rights to disqualify anyone breaking the T&Cs - not that they have to.

 

[gutsroy]

Because your marital status on Facebook is proof enough to take away 50k from a guy.

Ps. I believe he should be disqualified. Amateur investigations won't help get that done. They're clearly aware of the problem, they'll deal with it. If they don't disqualify him, there's nothing we can do. Their laws state they are within their rights to disqualify anyone breaking the T&Cs - not that they have to.

A bloke on twitter who seems to have connections to it just tweeted that apparently only his lower ranked teams will be disqualified, but not his top ranked squad. Difficult stance to justify, very slippery slope. But you are right, their call to make.

 

[gcsunsfc]

A bloke on twitter who seems to have connections to it just tweeted that apparently only his lower ranked teams will be disqualified, but not his top ranked squad. Difficult stance to justify, very slippery slope. But you are right, their call to make.

Yeah seems a bit of a weak gesture. I would think thats the last stance they should take, admitting there is an issue but not actually doing anything substantial about it.