- Aug 15, 2015
- 10,478
- 33,954
- AFL Club
- Richmond
It's going to be an intesting ballet come finals time with 90k members particularly if we are playing against another big Vic club.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
where do you find the up to date tiger numbers?8/12/17
Richmond-65,210(previous best approx. 52,568)
Collingwood~55,000?(can't admit to being second)
Hawthorn~55,000?(Why so quiet? Kennett is back to keep them ahead of us)
Adelaide~50,000?
West Coast~50,000?
Essendon-48,710
Port Adelaide-43,923
Geelong-42,073
Fremantle~40,000?
Carlton-33,937
Footscray~30,000?
St Kilda~30,000?
Melbourne-28,354
North Melbourne-26,384
Sydney-25,480
Brisbane-13,251
West Sydney-12,490
Gold Coast-6,410
The ones with nice round numbers are bullshitting. Pies, Hawks, Adelaide & West Coast.
#lolnorf - Soon to be Tasmania
Pies always quote round numberssss. It would be interesting to see their real numbers. In truth it should be on dollar value. There are so many membership types like 3 games etc. Which are great for country supporters etc. But really pet memberships and the like are total bullshit. Only true gauge is dollar value.maybe the crows will give away free memberships again like 2017 before the afl audit comes in and wipes about 17k off their tally
and as for the hawks - they are plotting and getting their big benefactors to buy memberships in bulk to magically pass us - watch this space
That thought has crossed my mind , imagine we’d played coll or ess in a final , it would fair dinkum sell out in an hourIt's going to be an intesting ballet come finals time with 90k members particularly if we are playing against another big Vic club.
No clubs includes pet memberships in their total. That myth has been debunked many times. If they did, the AFL swill simply remove them when they do their audit.Pies always quote round numberssss. It would be interesting to see their real numbers. In truth it should be on dollar value. There are so many membership types like 3 games etc. Which are great for country supporters etc. But really pet memberships and the like are total bullshit. Only true gauge is dollar value.
Yeah, clearly not everybody is going to get a ticket. Though having a membership gives you a chance if you're quick enough, not having a membership will mean there is literally no chance.It's going to be an intesting ballet come finals time with 90k members particularly if we are playing against another big Vic club.
Cool. I have no problems with 3 game members as it covers supporters living bush and that will roughly be an equal percentage for each club.No clubs includes pet memberships in their total. That has myth been debunked many times. If they did, the AFL swill simply remove them when they do their audit.
Dollar value can be deceptive. Essendon reserved seating costs a lot more than our equivalent reserved seating. I see giving supporters better value for money as a positive. As far as 3 game memberships go the vast majority of the clubs have them (and they meet the criteria from the afl to count them) so can't see an issue with including them.
I love how many members we're getting but am starting to worry about getting a seat at big games! I might have to book a reserve seat for the bigger games now!
Yep will def get to that stage I reckon , bare in mind , one game membership A&M provides finals access tooYeah, clearly not everybody is going to get a ticket. Though having a membership gives you a chance if you're quick enough, not having a membership will mean there is literally no chance.
That's interesting.No. I had fantastic seats but the 2 I gave away were crap. Rioli club is garbage.
I rekon we will sell out of memberships85,000 guys - 90,000 is a dream and would be an outstanding result
The club can't be blamed for GF tickets, they've got no control, all it does is give you a guaranteed seat in the ticketek ballot of which only so many seats are available and it's literally a lottery as to where your barcode comes up, for people to complain while thousands of people missed out who would have take the so called crap seats in a heartbeat is pretty poor form.That's interesting.
I'm actually not surprised that the club, after happily taking money from it's most loyal supporters for years, it is only too happy to rip them off when it comes to repaying that loyalty.
I was in the Rioli club for a few years until a couple of years ago, but in the end thought the the money saved by not being in the club could go towards getting good tickets should Richmond ever make the grand final. Obviously a good decision.
I call bullshit. Those that have paid a higher premium should get the best seats available to them. If you pay top dollar for a membership you should be entitled to a better seat. The ballot should only be in place for those that have not paid for reserved seating. The higher price you've paid should entitle you to your best available seat. If you are in a top dollar membership your seat should be allocated before a Rioli club member and definitely before a non guaranteed seat membership. If members who pay top dollar get shit tickets they may aswell drop their memberships and buy scalped tickets. That way they can choose the location. This would end up costing the club money. It's not poor form to complain about shit seats if you've payed out hard earnt unlike many who got a reasonable seats for very little outlay via a bullshit ballot. Yes I do understand that it is out of Richmonds hands though.The club can't be blamed for GF tickets, they've got no control, all it does is give you a guaranteed seat in the ticketek ballot of which only so many seats are available and it's literally a lottery as to where your barcode comes up, for people to complain while thousands of people missed out who would have take the so called crap seats in a heartbeat is pretty poor form.
I agree with this , This is how you will sell upgrades and get a better yield from memberships, Whilst everybody wants to attend a GF and have great seats this is not possible so the club needs to get members upgrading to maximise profitsI call bullshit. Those that have paid a higher premium should get the best seats available to them. If you pay top dollar for a membership you should be entitled to a better seat. The ballot should only be in place for those that have not paid for reserved seating. The higher price you've paid should entitle you to your best available seat. If you are in a top dollar membership your seat should be allocated before a Rioli club member and definitely before a non guaranteed seat membership. If members who pay top dollar get shit tickets they may aswell drop their memberships and buy scalped tickets. That way they can choose the location. This would end up costing the club money. It's not poor form to complain about shit seats if you've payed out hard earnt unlike many who got a reasonable seats for very little outlay via a bullshit ballot. Yes I do understand that it is out of Richmonds hands though.
Pies always quote round numberssss. It would be interesting to see their real numbers. In truth it should be on dollar value. There are so many membership types like 3 games etc. Which are great for country supporters etc. But really pet memberships and the like are total bullshit. Only true gauge is dollar value.
No clubs includes pet memberships in their total. That myth has been debunked many times. If they did, the AFL swill simply remove them when they do their audit.
Dollar value can be deceptive. Essendon reserved seating costs a lot more than our equivalent reserved seating. I see giving supporters better value for money as a positive. As far as 3 game memberships go the vast majority of the clubs have them (and they meet the criteria from the afl to count them) so can't see an issue with including them.
I call bullshit. Those that have paid a higher premium should get the best seats available to them. If you pay top dollar for a membership you should be entitled to a better seat. The ballot should only be in place for those that have not paid for reserved seating. The higher price you've paid should entitle you to your best available seat. If you are in a top dollar membership your seat should be allocated before a Rioli club member and definitely before a non guaranteed seat membership. If members who pay top dollar get shit tickets they may aswell drop their memberships and buy scalped tickets. That way they can choose the location. This would end up costing the club money. It's not poor form to complain about shit seats if you've payed out hard earnt unlike many who got a reasonable seats for very little outlay via a bullshit ballot. Yes I do understand that it is out of Richmonds hands though.
Norf should merge with WerribeeNah I'm living in Tassie don't want those flogs down here.
Nope and nope.I call bullshit. Those that have paid a higher premium should get the best seats available to them. If you pay top dollar for a membership you should be entitled to a better seat. The ballot should only be in place for those that have not paid for reserved seating. The higher price you've paid should entitle you to your best available seat. If you are in a top dollar membership your seat should be allocated before a Rioli club member and definitely before a non guaranteed seat membership. If members who pay top dollar get shit tickets they may aswell drop their memberships and buy scalped tickets. That way they can choose the location. This would end up costing the club money. It's not poor form to complain about shit seats if you've payed out hard earnt unlike many who got a reasonable seats for very little outlay via a bullshit ballot. Yes I do understand that it is out of Richmonds hands though.