-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
2019 Draft
- Thread starter Tomnat Tigers
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Trade is a win win imo. Port move their picks so they're not wasted on Mead and Brisbane do as you've mentioned above52 & 55 for 29
16 for probably a top 10 next year.
We have to have 38 minimum on the senior list. Only have 33 at the moment, so were either taking 5 picks or signing a delisted free agent.
tigs2010
Pick 1...
Forgot about Mead. Makes sense now. On face value it looked rubbish
- Mar 1, 2010
- 24,542
- 17,931
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Well whats interesting is some have Hawks picking Henry at 11 forcing Fremantles hand with pick 22.
Some have us at 19 forcing Hawks hand with Macginess. This is on Knightmares mock draft treat it with grain of salt but even so food for thought
If we could trade to get 22, Fremantle would not have to worry about it a match at 11 or after to match with Henry, they get bonus points from a trade with us somehow.
I think Port could get Kemp given they now have 3 picks but who knows who they are chasing some probably SA connected. Are they looking to trade up again like Geelong??
At 11 and if Kemp still there we could trade for it offering 19 and extras to Hawks. the thing is they will not want to use 19 on Macginess. We could use 2021 picks and trade Hawks pick 19 once its safe from McGuniess at the pick point. Hawks then could use it on Cooper s or whoever they want.
If we get 22 in a trade can we trade it to another club later for another pick trade??
So we could end up with Kemp and pick 22 or Cooper S or whoever at 19 and someone at 22 if Kemp goes before hand or we could trade 22 to say North for their two second round picks and give the something else
The thing is now there is a lot of clubs with multiple picks before 30. Port, Geelong, Suns, Freo and others and they will be looking for options to improve what they want. Clubs with multiple picks mean they will mix it up as they will not pick the same generally plus will not pick types that they already have generally especially where existing guns so should be some slippage due to multiple pick bias as well as timing
Last edited:
- Banned
- #881
i like the sound of Pickett but it sounds as if his stock is rising past our bevy of third rounders
- Banned
- #882
if they can get him almost 'for free' like we did Naish, thats a big win for them
lions are banking on port being shyte next year. which might be a good bet
Last edited:
The Afl stuffed us with the Ellis compo as that would have given us so much more flexibility and appeal holding #19+#20
I dont think anybody will be looking to trade with Richmond with the picks we hold until draft night and dependant on where the bids come
If a bid for Henry comes before #10 that rules us out of trading with Fremantle and same with the Hawks / mcginness (unlikely)
Another trade i would consider is Richmond 2020 1st rounder + #56 for North's #26+#27
- Banned
- #884
if Richmond include future first round picks many clubs will listen to what we gotta say. #19, future first and third rounders is a strong hand
It might be a good idea too, given the premiership window and number of talented kids already at the club
19 / 26 / 27 or some combination could be further trade too up the draft order ?
interesting debate spread the love or target a kemp or mcansey
Last edited:
- Mar 1, 2010
- 24,542
- 17,931
- AFL Club
- Richmond
I don't mind that North trade but it means North do not have many 2019 picks. Still they could have a big win if RFC do not go well in 2020 touch wood.
Even if we started 19, 22, 26,27, 30 and so forth thats not a bad position in this years draft I think
Last edited:
With all these clubs having multiple first round picks ,you'd think we will get players slipping to us that we didn't expect .
Clubs will pick for needs not just best available if they only have one pick .
On SM-A520F using BigFooty.com mobile app
Clubs will pick for needs not just best available if they only have one pick .
On SM-A520F using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Banned
- #888
de koning may not go that high
Toadvine
17?19?
- Feb 29, 2008
- 8,337
- 14,820
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Baltimore Ravens
Boo hoo. I'm not fussed.
- Mar 1, 2010
- 24,542
- 17,931
- AFL Club
- Richmond
exactly , we got Lynch last year so why worry in that department?
Why might even trade 19 to Hawks if they want a KPP and we want something else
Tiger_Of_Old
THE_GUN:"Why don't you use your reg acc"7/9/24
Draft Mids/Flankers
F/A-KP's.(Let other clubs do the hard work).
F/A-KP's.(Let other clubs do the hard work).
Eggmolessi-Smith?Pick 19?
Next year; we would have Rioli, Rioli, Pickett, Pickett, Bolton, Stack, Edwards
- Jan 7, 2010
- 12,876
- 37,833
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Adelaide Strikers
- Oct 6, 2013
- 9,139
- 6,332
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Sixers, Exers, GWS Womens
How's it a win for the Hawks when we lose points?
Also wouldn't trade for picks considerably after pick 42 as points will be taken out of 42 meaning we'll end up with a stack of 50s picks.
I'd rather keep 30 then trade it for even 38 & 56 which is a slight points advantage.
I can understand not liking 30 & 54 for 39, 41 & 56 but there's no reason we'd do a deal for 56 that I can see.
I guess a trade with Adelaide would work better with them having 37 & 45/49.
Anyway. Cheers for the answers. Probably fair that you wouldn't be interested.
Fake news.
Our recruitment is headed by Matt Clarke who was appointed for the 2016 Draft onwards. Why would the 2014 Draft have any bearing on his body of work?
Quiet you.
- Mar 1, 2010
- 24,542
- 17,931
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Good luck with trying to get 37 , 45/49 from Adelaide.
It is just a way of avoiding losing 30 value for Macguiness when you can get Macguiness for less via a trade for picks like with RFC
