Same as me, silly by me picking gawm in the wet7/8 again, Gawn got me this time. 4 or 5 SGM Multis in a row done by one leg.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Same as me, silly by me picking gawm in the wet7/8 again, Gawn got me this time. 4 or 5 SGM Multis in a row done by one leg.
Would love it if a betting agency had a market for 'Exact Number of Goals' kicked by a player.
I made the assumption he would dominate our rucksSame as me, silly by me picking gawm in the wet
In the main market the Disposal/Goal scorer markets are there. In the same game multi section they are not(On my accounts anyway). I noticed last night they didn’t even have the same game multi section at all so obviously having issues
He also said he wanted to find a market for Hawkins not to kick a goal in the wet but then in the same post said he liked him for 2+ haha, absolute raffle
$11 in the wet? I would very much like to place a bet with you...I just think it would be interesting to have an Exact Goal market for the big players such as Tom Hawkins. (assuming no bookies margin) Id price it like this for him tonight:
Tom Hawkins Goals:
0 Goals: $11
1 Goal: $5
2 Goals: $3.70
3 Goals: $3.85
4 Goals: $7
5 Goals: $28
6+ Goals: $101
id be interested in a having a tenner at 0 goals, but my expectation is he would kick 2+. ( i know that sounds like an unusual way to bet)
That's what I was thinking. 1 would have to be favourite but he's much more chance of 0 than 3 IMO$11 in the wet? I would very much like to place a bet with you...
Id be happy to take odds of around $6 for Hawkins to kick 0 goals. We should have the ability to negotiate with the bookies.That's what I was thinking. 1 would have to be favourite but he's much more chance of 0 than 3 IMO
Tweet them, they might put a market up if they think they can make money off itId be happy to take odds of around $6 for Hawkins to kick 0 goals. We should have the ability to negotiate with the bookies.
Tweet them, they might put a market up if they think they can make money off it
Though I agree with the others it's probably on the match-fixing spectrum and they can't
7 out of the last 9 games u mentioned are from 2017 or earlier, different line ups, different coach, different team strengths.Another little quirky stat, I found was Dangerfield has polled Brownlow votes in 6 of the last 9 matches against Freo. (not including Finals). 3 of those 9 matches he was voted best on ground.
Like most of them. Although I'm a bit wary of betting on too many disposals overs in the same game. Some will get more disposals, some will get less. So if Brayshaw gets 15 +, could mean less midfield time for Walters, less uncontested possessions for Walters etc...Brayshaw 15+
Constable 15+
Walters 20+
Danger 20+
Rohan AGS
Matera 2+
@36
Really rate this for a nibbleBrayshaw 15+
Constable 15+
Walters 20+
Danger 20+
Rohan AGS
Matera 2+
@36
BetEasy lines feel like they're a lot sharper than previous years, hard to get a read on.Mark O'Connor under 51.5 Fantasy (Beteasy) - $1.88
Was expecting this to be a higher line but from experience the Beteasy fantasy lines are pretty sophisticated, probably has just as many dimensions as the model I use.
Yeah in general their lines are quite precise. Although that could be dependent on what kind of punter you are and which side you take. I prefer overs, but Im sure there are those that prefer unders who find Beteasy lines incredibly profitable.BetEasy lines feel like they're a lot sharper than previous years, hard to get a read on.
Not sure if you realised but he's covered that line comfortably all of the last 3 weeks?... Did you mean overs?James Aish under 16.5 disposals @ 1.97 (Topsport). 4/7 this season (plus last three), but has shifted down back the last fortnight and defenders have struggled against the Cats this year. Showers help too.