- Sep 5, 2013
- 6,704
- 11,395
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Western Bulldogs
Geez, just having a look at B Ellis, averaging 116 over the last 4
Trades 2021 Round 6 Fantasy Trades
- Thread starter WaynesWorld19
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
- Oct 14, 2011
- 69,832
- 122,193
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Talk of Atkins dropped v Eagles tall fwd line. Was looking like an ok pick with a pair of 88’s but looked shit v North. Don’t need much of an excuse to cut another mid pricer.
Webster > Macrae Jr
Atkins > Titch
With some DPP swaps have wormed Burgess away from the backline for Bergman D6 so Highmore up can wait (him to Stocker could be a move). Leaves me with
Laird Doc Ridley Hind Fanta Bergman (Kosi Spudmore)
Macrae Zez Steele Titch Taranto Powell Jordon Macrae Jr (Berry Brock)
Grundy Flynn (Burgo)
Dunkley Phillips Stepho Gulden Warner Rowe (Treacy, Fullarspud)
110k itb. Hopefully Kosi goes ok v Crows as cover for Ridley.
Phillips/Flynn for Gawn/rook next week when Mummy inevitably returns.
Let’s see what goes wrong between now and then. Horse hasn’t reared his ugly head yet.. Swans rooks rested is the spanner I’m waiting for.
Webster > Macrae Jr
Atkins > Titch
With some DPP swaps have wormed Burgess away from the backline for Bergman D6 so Highmore up can wait (him to Stocker could be a move). Leaves me with
Laird Doc Ridley Hind Fanta Bergman (Kosi Spudmore)
Macrae Zez Steele Titch Taranto Powell Jordon Macrae Jr (Berry Brock)
Grundy Flynn (Burgo)
Dunkley Phillips Stepho Gulden Warner Rowe (Treacy, Fullarspud)
110k itb. Hopefully Kosi goes ok v Crows as cover for Ridley.
Phillips/Flynn for Gawn/rook next week when Mummy inevitably returns.
Let’s see what goes wrong between now and then. Horse hasn’t reared his ugly head yet.. Swans rooks rested is the spanner I’m waiting for.
Think it helps that he's dropped over 150K, so people see a lot of upside there. With that said, I think at least half of his games for the rest of the season, he gets tagged. Will have some monster games, but when you've got Treloar, Brouch, Titch, Danger, all as underpriced too, it's hard to justify Neale when he's so much more susceptible to a tag than the rest of the aforementioned
The good thing about the Swans rooks, is that basically everyone has Warner and Gulden at least, so if they get rested, you're not losing anything given everyone else has them too (provided you have some form of cover on the bench). Campbell is the most useless one and the one that can be traded out first/will be rested first IMO
With that said, Daniel will be cheaper than Sholl in two weeks, and Ridley and Houston will be around 650K, so do you hold off on trading in a midpricer, or bank cash to get likely Top 6 types who'll be a similar price?
It's why I'm giving Sholl a miss, as he's still in a Bottom 4 team, and he still only scores really well against Bottom 8 teams (and us in Round 1 who played like a bottom 4 team, lol). Up against Sydney, he only scored 47, and up against the Suns who aren't that great either, he scored 74. His run coming up after next week is very tough, so it could be a bit of a trap if the Crows are getting belted and not winning much ball.
If you jumped on at 500K it'd be worth it, but nearly 600K, you'd wanna be sure he's in the top 6-8 come the pointy end of the season IMO
I'd go Treloar (or Crisp who I really wanted this week but I'll have to wait until the end of the round to grab) but Salvos Dusty screwed me with such a massive price drop, that Brouch is the best I can get to.
He's in my favourites list, and had him locked in with his price point vs what he's done in the past, so it's a no brainer with the draw he's got coming up and Gresham being out for the season meaning he's a lock for pretty much 100% mid time for the rest of the year.
Decided I'm just going to only pick those who are in my favourites list, so that I don't get sidetracked by new and shiny things haha - so he's just crossing off one off the list, while I wait to get Trel, Crisp, Ridley, Ziebell, Daniel and Danger over the coming 8-12 weeks
- Sep 8, 2013
- 5,661
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Absolute fair points you raise there. You’ve got me considering Ward and banking 50k
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #383
It's fair to say most of the SP's have been tagged and performed poorly .....Piggy, Zerrett, Neale and even Cripps / Danger
Some players are more Fantasy relevant and some SC relevant ......I've just brought Neale in as a must have for SC ...yet my preference is Piggy in Fantasy
Interesting with Neale, in the last 4 games v CARL he's scored big in 3 of those games .....each time Curnow was playing
Ward is interesting, as he's got the Dogs this week which will probably be a 70-80, but could be very solid after that. If you had no choice, I'd choose him given the cash savings and his decent upside. If you do though and can get that bit higher, you're better off getting to a Brouch, Treloar, Neale, Titch, Ziebell etc. type
Anyone factoring in the byes with their upgrade targets?
I only have 12 premos but with RO'B in next week I'll have 6 premos out already for rnd 14 and 8 of my current rookies.
For me I'll be targeting the rnd 12-13 premos to spread the load a bit.
I only have 12 premos but with RO'B in next week I'll have 6 premos out already for rnd 14 and 8 of my current rookies.
For me I'll be targeting the rnd 12-13 premos to spread the load a bit.
That is interesting re: Neale and the Curnow tag...
Maybe it gets a bit harder now though that Walsh is on the inside, Berry as a big body is not playing, and Williams is added to that midfield mix - so Neale doesn't win as much ball/makes it easier for Curnow to 'check' Neale, without having other mids try and stop him.
Absolute agree on Titch in Fantasy vs Neale in SC - completely different scoring schema and thus completely different when it comes to what players are best for that particular format
TedDougChris
🏆 🦍
- Mar 10, 2007
- 52,545
- 98,137
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Charlton Athletic, Roys FFC
Ward is interesting, as he's got the Dogs this week which will probably be a 70-80, but could be very solid after that. If you had no choice, I'd choose him given the cash savings and his decent upside. If you do though and can get that bit higher, you're better off getting to a Brouch, Treloar, Neale, Titch, Ziebell etc. type
he's one I'm keen on - if only to get a rookie off the field if I can - depending on cash generation if it starts to slow.... May not be able to go straight to a premium, so picking a rising midpricer may be required..
TedDougChris
🏆 🦍
- Mar 10, 2007
- 52,545
- 98,137
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Other Teams
- Charlton Athletic, Roys FFC
in a week or so I'll start thinking about it....
You always want to have more R14 premos than 12 and 13, as you can always trade up/down in the final week, rather than being limited in your options like you will be in R12 (anyone you trade in will basically be missing again over the next 2 weeks).
For mine, I've always gone something like
8 - 10 - 12
Spreads the load most evenly IMO
Haha nice
- Oct 14, 2011
- 69,832
- 122,193
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Gulden > Rowe would just about top that off
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #393
Doesn't appear Curnow has applied hard tags in a number of CARL games ......O'Connor GEEL's tagger is out with a heelThat is interesting re: Neale and the Curnow tag...
Maybe it gets a bit harder now though that Walsh is on the inside, Berry as a big body is not playing, and Williams is added to that midfield mix - so Neale doesn't win as much ball/makes it easier for Curnow to 'check' Neale, without having other mids try and stop him.
Absolute agree on Titch in Fantasy vs Neale in SC - completely different scoring schema and thus completely different when it comes to what players are best for that particular format
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #394
Pity ....Witherden maay have been a good option in DEF
- May 20, 2017
- 5,933
- 9,717
- AFL Club
- West Coast
What happened to Worpel?
He was one we debated on walsh versus worpel... I was convinced worpel would be better.
He's a shadow of himself in this defensive tagging role he seems to be playing. Will it stick?
If its only temporary he might be a good get in a couple weeks for a rookie upgrade.
He was one we debated on walsh versus worpel... I was convinced worpel would be better.
He's a shadow of himself in this defensive tagging role he seems to be playing. Will it stick?
If its only temporary he might be a good get in a couple weeks for a rookie upgrade.
JDWCE
Norm Smith Medallist
He’s only been playing that role the last couple weeks. Prior to that he was just running around like a headless chook. I’ve been following him closely as I’ve got him in all my keeper leagues. Prick
Read a lot on the hawks board. They think the speed of the game is impacting him and the fact him and Titch play such similar roles so he’s been shunned out of position somewhat. Although the latter I’m not sure on as he’s played some very good games with Titch in the side before
- Mar 20, 2007
- 30,062
- 28,339
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Berry to Bergman (expected to go up 40k, compared to Macrae who is only going to go up 20-30k)
Hardwick to Sholl
Hardwick to Sholl
- Sep 8, 2013
- 5,661
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Richmond
For the Webster owners, he’s listed as a test on the injury list and will have a run later this week to prove his fitness
- Sep 8, 2013
- 5,661
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Would 4 midfielders and 7 overall premiums from the one bye round be considered too
Many? Just looked at an option where I could possibly get Neale in but already have Macrae, Zerrett, Walsh as round 13 bye premiums in the midfield
Many? Just looked at an option where I could possibly get Neale in but already have Macrae, Zerrett, Walsh as round 13 bye premiums in the midfield
My thinking is that as long as you have 18 scoring players each round, the byes will balance out over the three weeks.
Let's say that prior to the start of the byes (6 rounds from now), you have 14 premos in your team. If 7 are on the first bye, you still have another 7 playing. Maybe four of these are out in week 2, three in week 3. This will mean you have 10 premos playing in week 2 and 11 in week three.
That's not even considering the upgrades you do during the bye rounds, where you should get at least one more premo in each week with three trades to play with.
Obviously you don't want to be fielding 30 point rookies, but if you can have 14 premos prior to byes, you should come out of the byes with at least 17 premos. The other 5 onfield players will be either midpricers that are scoring OK, or rookies with plenty of growth to come.
This is my plan, but injuries and idiot coaches will always try to stuff it up
My current setup has 11, 9, 9 for the three rounds. For my onfield team (including Ridley), it's 5, 7, 10.
Quite happy with that, knowing I have 6 wweks to consider the balance...
- Status
