- Sep 8, 2013
- 5,661
- 9,367
- AFL Club
- Richmond
K.Coleman v Mccomb?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I’m happy to hold but that might be because I’ve got several other non-playing personnel that can go before him. But even if he was the only out then I definitely see the merit in holding him for one more. Clear top-6 defender with a good run coming up and SURELY he’s back next week?I've considered trading Hewett, but his run if he comes back next week, is ridiculous:
Round 9: Giants - NEUTRAL
Round 10: Sydney - GOOD (every player wants to have a blinder against their old side, and I reckon he'll monster it - still a hard team though)
Round 11: Collingwood -VERY GOOD
Round 12: BYE
Round 13: Essendon - VERY GOOD
Round 14: Richmond - VERY GOOD
Essentially if you give 0 points for a bad match up, 1 for neutral, 2 for good and 3 for very good - he's got 12 out of a possible 15 points over 5 rounds. Still not a bad idea to trade, but I'm always playing the long game and just trying to complete my team, rather than trade straight out. Weird year though, so I'm not against it like other years
Unrelated to your team but that screenshot is larger than my team on the actual Fantasy website...Change of plans, I'm just getting Coop in as I was never getting Caroll anyway as I had Clark locked in. Already have McComb traded in last week, so I'll roll the dice and miss out on the Round 12 bye player - as I have too many as it is already. Hopefully Coop, McComb and Clark somehow make it to their byes (not bloody likely), in which case I'll be back on track again.
McInnes > Coop
JHF > Crisp
100K remaining
Gives me this side (which is not bad, all things considering - 28 green dots):
View attachment 1392845
You're assuming he comes back and maintains his pre-injury output. If he does, he's a target for round 13.I've considered trading Hewett, but his run if he comes back next week, is ridiculous:
Round 9: Giants - NEUTRAL
Round 10: Sydney - GOOD (every player wants to have a blinder against their old side, and I reckon he'll monster it - still a hard team though)
Round 11: Collingwood -VERY GOOD
Round 12: BYE
Round 13: Essendon - VERY GOOD
Round 14: Richmond - VERY GOOD
Essentially if you give 0 points for a bad match up, 1 for neutral, 2 for good and 3 for very good - he's got 12 out of a possible 15 points over 5 rounds. Still not a bad idea to trade, but I'm always playing the long game and just trying to complete my team, rather than trade straight out. Weird year though, so I'm not against it like other years
Yeah Windows seems to scale things differently on here - when I 'snip' webpagesUnrelated to your team but that screenshot is larger than my team on the AFL Fantasy webpage...
Completely agree, and trust me - I'm not potting the move to get rid of him. It'll probably bite me in the ass TBH, but when I think about how many teams have him and how many will likely hold, I'm reluctant to go against more than half the comp. He's not some 80's guy either, he's displayed he's a genuine Top 6 DEF (currently he's Top 3) with his role and his ability. One I'm happy to grin and bear, if it means one less trade wasted.You're assuming he comes back and maintains his pre-injury output. If he does, he's a target for round 13.
I'm no medico, but if he was close to full recovery, they would have named him, as there's still 3 days till there game.
DawsonCrunch time:
McComb v Carrol
and
Parker v Stewart
Stewart's upside is that he is basically the only Round 13 defender in the Game.
Until daicos is out and you are forced to play SDK, because you traded JHF already!!!Change of plans, I'm just getting Coop in as I was never getting Caroll anyway as I had Clark locked in. Already have McComb traded in last week, so I'll roll the dice and miss out on the Round 12 bye player - as I have too many as it is already. Hopefully Coop, McComb and Clark somehow make it to their byes (not bloody likely), in which case I'll be back on track again.
McInnes > Coop
JHF > Crisp
100K remaining
Gives me this side (which is not bad, all things considering - 28 green dots and looping McComb with Hewett):
View attachment 1392845
Until daicos is out and you are forced to play SDK, because you traded JHF already!!!
yeh i didnt look at it close enough hahaI'm already in that position - no matter what happens, haha. NOD is being played on field, due to Hewett missing again. It's why I had to get a premo defender this week, because I would have copped a donut otherwise. JHF out just means I can get all the way up to Crisp - who is a Top 2 DEF in the game right now
yeh i didnt look at it close enough haha
Is there any way you can somehow get maccomb on the field if daicos is out? so you end up start mccomb instead of SDK?
I like it a lot but that midfield needs a build up - not much uber and Duncan yuck.Change of plans, I'm just getting Coop in as I was never getting Caroll anyway as I had Clark locked in. Already have McComb traded in last week, so I'll roll the dice and miss out on the Round 12 bye player - as I have too many as it is already. Hopefully Coop, McComb and Clark somehow make it to their byes (not bloody likely), in which case I'll be back on track again.
McInnes > Coop
JHF > Crisp
100K remaining
Gives me this side (which is not bad, all things considering - 28 green dots and looping McComb with Hewett):
View attachment 1392845
I like it a lot but that midfield needs a build up - not much uber and Duncan yuck.
Coleman for JS IMOSo Criuch to Cripps locked
Trade 2
1. Rachele to Mccomb
Keep playing a NOD/Mccomb at M7 from next week, Clark M8
2. Rachele to Coleman, NOD becomes M9 next week, Coleman F6, but can float
Essentially Coleman v Mccomb? With either likely an on field guy
Reckon freo_leo29 is TedDougChris alt
The rd 12 bye is the kicker for me. Trading Hewett allows me to get Touk. If I kept him and traded Daicos, I could only get Cripps. I'd then have 14 out (including 2 red dots) for the rd 12 bye.I trust the Blues more than most teams though. They said Cripps 1 week and it was.
I think they genuinely did think Hewy would be back and should be next week. Annoying with the r12 bye but alas.