- Sep 26, 2004
- 47,986
- 65,024
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Moderator
- #23
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He isn't acting like it's not a problem. He is zeroing in on what the problem is.10 required players over a four year period, not to mention Hogan, Langdon and Neale.
You can’t act like it’s not a problem.
The greatest failures have been;Freo are great drafters and generally great developers. Just need to hold onto them into their primes.
Say what you want about the names coming and going but losing multiple best 22 players year on year has delayed the build.
In review the draft shows how utterly pointless picks 13-55 really were in terms of difference.
Id have taken Murphy ahead of Dawson for example and one went at 21 and the other 41. I would have taken Edwards ahead of Goad and one went at 20 and the other 30 odd. For this reason I feel the teams who were in that 25-50 range are the teams who did the best value wise
From the draft id say 3 clear winners were Geelong, St Kilda and Fremantle. All got great value for what they had.
For Eagles Im just okay with it. Got the game changer we needed, a more long term forward to replace Darling whose still got 2 years in him and then some middling midfielders who I think we overrated and went too early with. I think at pick 49 we should have went ZZ or Roberts to diversify out picks a bit better
Biggest losers were North who overreached for players in the early 20s who would have been around in the 30s anyway. Would have been better off trading into next years draft with those picks and picking later. GWS got it horribly wrong also with pick 12/16 muckup . Sydney Swans also I think went weird in not going for some more AFL ready bodies, especially when it comes to defenders. Crimiunal to not grab one of Murphy/ZZ with a trade down
To me it looks apparent in retrospect that there was little difference between a lot of the players beyond the first round.Over reached for 2 players that Twomey had as possibilities at Adelaide in the early teens and Hardeman in the mid teens.
Sound logic.
Now now a little harshNot so sure about that.
Freo failed to get the gresham pick for henry (yes i understand leverage but still) and that pick ends up going on collard. Then they try to get cute with mannagh and get him through to a later pick. If theres any club that always takes mature agers early its geelong-im not sure how they didnt read the room-they had to take him at 35.
Im pretty happy with our picks but i also think coll did very well relative to the picks they had..demattia and jiath are dynamic and will be very good players. I do think lual and roberts will be good picks for ess (caddy im not so sure of). I also think the eagles last 3 picks are very good.
Collard was supposedly homesick on the State carnival road trips, clearly Saints must rate him because feels like the chance of him extending past his first contract is pretty slim, yet alone playing his whole career away from home.Can't say Curtin looked particularly thrilled when selected by the crows. Same with Collard and Saints.
Collard is the type of guy who takes a dump at home with the toilet door open just in case he gets homesick mid dumpCollard was supposedly homesick on the State carnival road trips, clearly Saints must rate him because feels like the chance of him extending past his first contract is pretty slim, yet alone playing his whole career away from home.
Is there a list of the players just selected? Missed the "telecast" and can't find the list anywhere.
To me it looks apparent in retrospect that there was little difference between a lot of the players beyond the first round.
Maybe trueCollard is the type of guy who takes a dump at home with the toilet door open just in case he gets homesick mid dump
I get the inkling its more of a path to WCE 1st rounder next year then a legit pick
Why is thatHe really won't.
I don't think we had the rights to Lloyd?Aside from the start up Brisbane Bears, no other expansion club that entered the AFL has been given so few draft concessions (although Neesham did kind of stuff them up by trading away the rights to Lloyd and McLeod for utter scrubs, Tony Delaney, Chris Groom SMH)
I don't think we had the rights to Lloyd?
Could be wrong, but I remember we had to trade those picks for experienced players, so they weren’t actually ours to take to the draft. That was the extent of our concessions, plus access to WAFL players.I think you had the pick to draft him but traded him to Essendon for Delaney and Ridley and maybe another scrub.
Do you mean Henry? Because he choose us. We didn't draft him and then complain when he goes home because he's home sick.You just picked up a kid Freo drafted from WA, it’s like you don’t even know your own team.
Could be wrong, but I remember we had to trade those picks for experienced players, so they weren’t actually ours to take to the draft. That was the extent of our concessions, plus access to WAFL players.
According to wiki he was a "compensatory selection that was awarded to Essendon by the AFL in return for losing Todd Ridley to the newly formed Dockers". Plenty of team building things to ridicule us about but that's not one of themI think you had the pick to draft him but traded him to Essendon for Delaney and Ridley and maybe another scrub.