balmainforever
Dibs
- Sep 4, 2003
- 25,757
- 30,618
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Balmain, GreenBay, Edmonton, Celtic
- Moderator
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I like it bro. I'm tempted to tail u. Do I have to have funds in balance to cover max loss? or does it just go minus balance? if it's the latter I might just do big stake and if it smacks us for an L I'll delete the app i'll tell them to suck me off if they want me to add the funds back in is that how it can work??liking Braeden Campbell tommorow POINTSBET STAT MULTIPLYER ONLY 28 he's always within range from 55 out and gets in good spots.. goals in 5 of last 8 and shots in all 8 games.. gets a decent amount of handballs and kicks in his wing type role as he gains confidence.. also taken Hayward 29 he's a hungry guy and always gets forward at times and is getting decent amount of ball he's coming off a 90 total last week yes he snagged 2 goals, but also had a 91 game vs carlton where he got 14 kicks 7 handballs and a goal.. don't expect that much ball but a 10 kick 5 handball and a goal game could be the ballpark.. took Rowbottom too at a low 27 just as I'll be kicking myself if this is the game he slots 1 or 2 and has lots of ball, very reliable to mix handballs and kicks and hes gone 24, 23, 27, 21 four of the past 5 with just one quiet one vs Geelong (14).. probably should do the same with Mills but he's a bit higher at 41.. Franklin is tempting at only 49 after moving well last week and finding ball.. hopefully he handballs 4/5 times but if I take his spread
Dogs side i like their total points of Naughton (15), Jammara (13) Weightman (12) Was crazy they scored 67 of the dogs 77 last week but you'd think one gets loose here for a score of around 25 hopefully.. we only need 40 to break even so I think taking all 3 guys has a good amount of ceiling and a low floor.. surely they won't do a daniher and charlie cameron and all dissappear on us.
yeh unfortunately you need funds to cover bet... minimum bet is 0.50 cents so that's all I do as I only ever have 200-300 in my account.. so a bet on Campbell at 27 at 0.50 cents you'll need $13.50 in account... if he gets say 14 kicks x 6 handballs = 84 TOTAL you'll win by 57 so up $28.50.I like it bro. I'm tempted to tail u. Do I have to have funds in balance to cover max loss? or does it just go minus balance? if it's the latter I might just do big stake and if it smacks us for an L I'll delete the app i'll tell them to suck me off if they want me to add the funds back in is that how it can work??
yeh unfortunately you need funds to cover bet... minimum bet is 0.50 cents so that's all I do as I only ever have 200-300 in my account.. so a bet on Campbell at 27 at 0.50 cents you'll need $13.50 in account... if he gets say 14 kicks x 6 handballs = 84 TOTAL you'll win by 57 so up $28.50. HAHAHA BE SO GOOD if you didn't have to cover liability and just dissappear but yeh they are onto that I feel.
1st qtr line freo v pies at -9.5 smashing that
freo have lost 22 of 23 or something ridic and now missing half the team
The Dogs are better but the game is in Sydney so Swans are favourite. This isn't rocket science.Doggies drifting out to $2.20 on TAB.
Can anyone make sense of this? Lloyd and Warner out of the midfield, backline still cooked and season pretty much already over ladder wise. Dogs with everything to play for if they lose they’re out of the 8. WB can win away - last 3 interstate games wins against Freo & GWS with a loss to GC when they smashed them inside 50’s (66 to 48) just couldn’t kick straight/take advantage. Surely this backline can’t keep the Bulldogs talls at bay. And then swans drop Hickey? Surely English and the mids feast. Horse’s 300th makes it a narrative game to keep the cue out of the rack but beyond that I don’t get it…
Edit: add to this the Swans haven't beaten a single top 8 side all season.
but thats it though swans will also see this as a last ditch chance given the compressed nature of the ladder. not completely over for themThe Dogs are better but the game is in Sydney so Swans are favourite. This isn't rocket science.
ok found one on pointsbet PETRACCA kicks x hballs UNDER 177... Jordan and Sparrow are more than capable in the middle with Viney and Brayshaw to leave Petracca forward... sure he may attend a couple centre bounces here or there but 177 is very high... he was influential last week and still only ended at 8 kicks x 12 handballs for a total of 96.. I feel the handballs was pretty big for a guy playing deeper and that may lower this week to around 7 or 8, will probably cop Starcevich too who plays pretty tight.. even if he somehow has a huge game it seems he's been priced as a midfielder with his over line set at 207 compared to viney 186... if he somehow plays full mid and gets say 16 kicks 14 handballs you'll only lose $57 for a $1 stake...
but the ceiling of this bet could be say a 10 kick x 7 handball game where he stays very deep ... thats $107 profit.
no i am saying worst case scenario he somehow ends up mainly mid.. the loss should be pretty minimal... Grundy may be out which would mean VAN ROOYEN in.. but he kind of plays more a lead up target role normally so I don't think it would change Petracca much from being deep forward with Brown and Melksham floating aroundAlthough you noted reasons why he might play deeper forwards, he is still more likely to get 30 touches than 17?
I'll fly tackle that prick