- Mar 20, 2013
- 5,178
- 5,314
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Wish he was R/F could be a sneaky cheap option who wouldn’t be a smash pick but can only go up.i have stonks in filthy so im excited by this
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Wish he was R/F could be a sneaky cheap option who wouldn’t be a smash pick but can only go up.i have stonks in filthy so im excited by this
ROB responded magnificently when dropped last year .....he's been too comfortable with his position .....keeping him on his toes, could see a big season from himI wonder if we are comsidering An option of playing TT, Berg and ROB together with ROB being a sub out candidate
It’s an interesting quote as it’s not like all those names can play together (2/4 certain, 4/4 never and 3/4 still feels too tall with Tex and Fog)
So he is saying “not get those big minutes” but does he really mean his position isn’t secure?
Did he?ROB responded magnificently when dropped last year .....he's been too comfortable with his position .....keeping him on his toes, could see a big season from him
On my keepers bench, hoping Filthy can take over as that #1 ruck or enough minutes for DPP at Round 6. Not the biggest fan of Big OWish he was R/F could be a sneaky cheap option who wouldn’t be a smash pick but can only go up.
He’s just got to get a bit more aggressive in the air.On my keepers bench, hoping Filthy can take over as that #1 ruck or enough minutes for DPP at Round 6. Not the biggest fan of Big O
1 game?
Yes 1 game ....how many good games were you expecting from ROB1 game?
didn’t that game have crazy high stoppages (high tackle game too I seem to remember). Something about that game that inflated that as an outlier
I've been saying this a few weeks now .....been a big push to run Thilthorpe / Himmelberg as the RUCK combo
Unless ROB is taking marks & field possessions, he's next to useless, as a pure tap Ruck
How he was voted into the Leadership Group, when his position in the 22 is on a knifes edge is bewildering
My view of RUCK averages ....you either pay up for the best, or you pay for an el cheapo (Xerri)Yeah it's been something they've been talking about all pre-season, and now both Bickley in the media and Van Berlo as a coach, have confirmed it too. Literally only between 2 rucks for that other spot for me now - Witts and English
My view of RUCK averages ....you either pay up for the best, or you pay for an el cheapo (Xerri)
Taking middle tier Rucks, you can see by the averages .....you're neither making $$$ , or getting increases in averages , just disastrous middling selections
Cameron is a 80-85 ave player .....Lycett churned out a 45, negating any cost savingsSpot on.
D. Cameron, Lycett, Draper, Meek, McInerney, all fails this pre-season. Witts has done 104 before and looks good, so I'll even be happy with a solid 90-95 at this stage - given how injury prone guys like Darcy and English are/how insecure roles are for guys like Grundy, Gawn and ROB.
Similar to this, but Grundy and Darcy are still ones to look at if they are getting a large percentage of CBAs.Yeah it's been something they've been talking about all pre-season, and now both Bickley in the media and Van Berlo as a coach, have confirmed it too. Literally only between 2 rucks for that other spot for me now - Witts and English
How did English fit this model last year.My view of RUCK averages ....you either pay up for the best, or you pay for an el cheapo (Xerri)
Taking middle tier Rucks, you can see by the averages .....you're neither making $$$ , or getting increases in averages , just disastrous middling selections
Do we know how long hickey is missing?
I had Ladhams in my team last year and he was shocking so I won’t be going near him this seasonDo we know how long hickey is missing?
I think he’s an option
Showed he can score when at port and stints covering as solo Ruck. Although when he had chances last year didn’t score well
Between ladhams and Darcy for me.I had Ladhams in my team last year and he was shocking so I won’t be going near him this season
I've had him since I heard Freo were going to use Jackson as a mid. I think he can go mid-90's but I nevertheless plan to trade him to English when the price gap closes.What do we expect Darcy to ave? His popularity seems to have boomed the last week here.
I’m not reading much into his practice game score given Jackson was missing and he was up against an inanimate carbon rod in Lycett.
Can he push 95 which I think he needs to make it worthwhile or while he sit in that 85-90 grey zone which is more so where I’m leaning towards?
If I need some extra cash to minor tinkering, English down to Darcy is probably my only option but not sure I like that option.
+1 - I asked on the Freo board re Jackson and it seems he will be mainly used up forward. Given Darcy has had a solid PS uninterrupted, has shown he can score in the past, I don't see why he cant push 93-95 which sees him as a solid pick. If he gets 70% ruck time that's enough for me.I've had him since I heard Freo were going to use Jackson as a mid. I think he can go mid-90's but I nevertheless plan to trade him to English when the price gap closes.
I've had him since I heard Freo were going to use Jackson as a mid. I think he can go mid-90's but I nevertheless plan to trade him to English when the price gap closes.
I'm on Darcy atm too. I think he's a good stopgap for the meantime, allowing you to save some cash and have a look at the other rucks before a clear R2 emerges. Best case scenario he becomes a keeper.+1 - I asked on the Freo board re Jackson and it seems he will be mainly used up forward. Given Darcy has had a solid PS uninterrupted, has shown he can score in the past, I don't see why he cant push 93-95 which sees him as a solid pick. If he gets 70% ruck time that's enough for me.