- Sep 11, 2014
- 11,753
- 22,942
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
You just know that a few clubs (NM Included) would be cited by the commentary team and given 4 weeks.
I suppose if that was us it would be 4 weeks for sure lol
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You just know that a few clubs (NM Included) would be cited by the commentary team and given 4 weeks.
There is in betting yes?no draws in finals any more
Van Rooyen elbows McStay in the face.
Silence.
What about the all encompassing ’potential to cause injury’?What does the MRO matrix say?
Careless conduct? Severe impact? High contact? 3 weeks = end of year. High impact gets him 2.
View attachment 1796514
What about the all encompassing ’potential to cause injury’?
The clause used to engineer a lengthier suspension.
dunno as i don't betThere is in betting yes?
Ffs dees
They had one job.
Maynard should get weeks cos he’s a ****ing tool. This will have to do thoughWhat does the MRO matrix say?
Careless conduct? Severe impact? High contact? 3 weeks = end of year. High impact gets him 2.
View attachment 1796514
Melbourne just decide nah can’t be ****ed today?Pies just want it more.
They’ll winThe Dee is cooked
Was it Aaron Hall that got knocked out in a similar way to Brayshaw?
I don't think that this meets careless.What does the MRO matrix say?
Careless conduct? Severe impact? High contact? 3 weeks = end of year. High impact gets him 2.
View attachment 1796514
Lol. JinxPickett is showing why you need match winners like Watson/Reid in big games