grumbleguts
User name to post ratio checks out
He's a complete cretin, I put him on ignore ages ago and never looked back.Somehow, you always have the shittest takes on absolutely everything
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's a complete cretin, I put him on ignore ages ago and never looked back.Somehow, you always have the shittest takes on absolutely everything
Either that or he is an idiot. 50/50?
I thought the ball hit the bat handle? Massive noise and big snicko spike usually doesn't mean glove i thought
Nah the ball was past the handle by the time snicko occurred.I thought the ball hit the bat handle? Massive noise and big snicko spike usually doesn't mean glove i thought
I wish I could give this a champion trophy emoji. Absolutely bang onAustralia has been poor in all formats since Lords in the Ashes.
Too old, too boring, too stuck in their ways and too the same. Just reactive and devoid of any imagination, rudderless.
From the ball hitting a glove that wasn’t touching the bat, or touching the glove that WAS on the bat.
It wasn’t out mate. It was an incorrect decision.
Except it didn't.I thought the ball hit the bat handle? Massive noise and big snicko spike usually doesn't mean glove i thought
Even cricinfo is calling it a bizarre decision.Look at the replay dh
Eddie Jones to replace McDonaldPerhaps the Aussie rugby boys could come in and do better?
As per the MCC Laws of cricket Aristotle Pickett
Essentially, the glove must be in contact with bat whilst the ball strikes the glove. Refer to point 5.6.2.2
5.6 Contact with the ball
In these Laws,
5.6.1 reference to the bat shall imply that the bat is held in the batter’s hand or a glove worn on his/her hand, unless stated otherwise.
5.6.2 contact between the ball and any of 5.6.2.1 to 5.6.2.4
5.6.2.1 the bat itself
5.6.2.2 the batter’s hand holding the bat
5.6.2.3 any part of a glove worn on the batter’s hand holding the bat
5.6.2.4 any additional materials permitted under 5.4
shall be regarded as the ball striking or touching the bat or being struck by the bat.
33.1 Out Caught
The striker is out Caught if a ball delivered by the bowler, not being a No ball, touches his/her bat without having previously been in contact with any fielder, and is subsequently held by a fielder as a fair catch, as described in 33.2 and 33.3, before it touches the ground.
It was no near the right handed heckin'g glove mate. Give it up. Even Tubby Taylor said it was clearly out.As per the MCC Laws of cricket Aristotle Pickett
Essentially, the glove must be in contact with bat whilst the ball strikes the glove. Refer to point 5.6.2.2
5.6 Contact with the ball
In these Laws,
5.6.1 reference to the bat shall imply that the bat is held in the batter’s hand or a glove worn on his/her hand, unless stated otherwise.
5.6.2 contact between the ball and any of 5.6.2.1 to 5.6.2.4
5.6.2.1 the bat itself
5.6.2.2 the batter’s hand holding the bat
5.6.2.3 any part of a glove worn on the batter’s hand holding the bat
5.6.2.4 any additional materials permitted under 5.4
shall be regarded as the ball striking or touching the bat or being struck by the bat.
33.1 Out Caught
The striker is out Caught if a ball delivered by the bowler, not being a No ball, touches his/her bat without having previously been in contact with any fielder, and is subsequently held by a fielder as a fair catch, as described in 33.2 and 33.3, before it touches the ground.
I wonder if the Saffer players are sledging Marnus out there.
Probably not, they are too nice these days, Andre Nel would be giving him a mouthful.
It was no near the right handed *ingg glove mate. Give it up. Even Tubby Taylor said it was clearly out.
Oh without a doubt!After the past few pages I'm leaning towards idiot
I would even care if was unintelligent or wrong.He has to be trolling or short of several brain cells. How can he be so certain we he doesn’t even understand the rules.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
He has to be trolling or short of several brain cells. How can he be so certain we he doesn’t even understand the rules.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Refer back to the other picture from a few pages ago. It wasn’t near the left glove either.It was no near the right handed *ingg glove mate. Give it up. Even Tubby Taylor said it was clearly out.
Perpetually 15 deep if you've ever seen any post from them.I’m going to assume he’s about 15 deep to be posting some of the incoherent stuff he has on this particular subject