I felt that miss was a huge turning point. Dismal execution.Yes Aphrodite that's correct. The man on the mark was on the edge of the goalsquare. Just cannot afford to be missing those at such a crucial stage of the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I felt that miss was a huge turning point. Dismal execution.Yes Aphrodite that's correct. The man on the mark was on the edge of the goalsquare. Just cannot afford to be missing those at such a crucial stage of the game.
And look what the consistently good sides do:The midfield group responded after being poor last week. We absolutely dominated the first half but had less than a goal lead at the half. A slap in the face reminder of most of how last year transpired.
All the other usual issues popped up again.
Think that about covers it
- Slow ball movement
- Slow switching of the play only to face the same issue on the other wing
- Zero desire to take the game on (even when down 3 goals with 10 mins to go)
- Long bomb and hope kicks into the forward 50 and not to our forwards advantage (either not high enough for forwards to run and jump or to the oppositions advantage. I swear we picked out defenders more than our own)
- Poor forward craft (dumb leading patterns, smalls not at the fall of the ball)
- Inability to tackle and trap the ball in the forward 50 (made even more staggering that we can't lock it in when we long bomb to contests)
- No short hit-up passes into the forward 50
- Stupid snaps from long distance instead of a standard set shot, missing from the goal square.
Tap on the shoulder, see ya' again when fixed, me thinks.I felt that miss was a huge turning point. Dismal execution.
Boyd may be back this week (in the seniors).At the moment we have Williams, Gov, Philp, Marchy, Cuningham, Boyd and Martin who have spent more time injured than playing while at the club. At the end of this season, I think at least 3 of the above will be gone.
If Martin is still signed until 2024 might be almost worth paying him out or just hope he retires or we can settle somehow.
What's the point when it's just going to be bombed to an opposition player?Maybe getting players to present up at the ball carrier might be a good place to start.
We only ever switched it once per forward thrust. Could have switched it back a fourth serveral times until someone was free inside 50. But after one switch it was bomb it long.It was certainly frustrating yesterday but I knew it would be a dour affair. We handled it well enough in the first half and deserved a better lead at half time. Alas soft goals going the other way made it closer.
St Kilda’s best quarter was disappointing because we wasted good scoring opportunities which was a common theme during the game. The Saints were looking for that sort of lead because their confidence in the match plan is sky high. Unless you try something different they just shift the zone so you can’t move the ball with speed and in a direct line towards goal.
Which brings me to the last quarter. I would rather have lost the game by 10 goals as long as we tried to win the game. To persist with the game plan made no sense. I wanted run. I wanted risk taking. We kicked it sideways. We seemed to pack our 18 in one half of the ground. And when we won the ball there was no one in the forward fifty except for bloody St Kilda defenders.
I leave it up the experts at the club to figure something out. The players need to lift. There was plenty of effort but too much of it was wasted through lost opportunities and silly decisions when we controlled the ball. We’re definitely behind the eight ball at the moment and the players need to respond.
It was certainly frustrating yesterday but I knew it would be a dour affair. We handled it well enough in the first half and deserved a better lead at half time. Alas soft goals going the other way made it closer.
St Kilda’s best quarter was disappointing because we wasted good scoring opportunities which was a common theme during the game. The Saints were looking for that sort of lead because their confidence in the match plan is sky high. Unless you try something different they just shift the zone so you can’t move the ball with speed and in a direct line towards goal.
Which brings me to the last quarter. I would rather have lost the game by 10 goals as long as we tried to win the game. To persist with the game plan made no sense. I wanted run. I wanted risk taking. We kicked it sideways. We seemed to pack our 18 in one half of the ground. And when we won the ball there was no one in the forward fifty except for bloody St Kilda defenders.
I leave it up the experts at the club to figure something out. The players need to lift. There was plenty of effort but too much of it was wasted through lost opportunities and silly decisions when we controlled the ball. We’re definitely behind the eight ball at the moment and the players need to respond.
We're going to "contemplate" reviewing Harry's kicking!
He is probably an over thinker so what should be instinctive — he complicates. Too much second guessing.It's funny that Harry is actually supposedly super intelligent (off the field). Reminds me a bit of Will Minson who was mensa-esque just pulled out many a brain fart on the field, like our Harry.
Im a huge SOS fan but that miss in the third was simply not good enough. In a very even contest that made a huge difference. Has to be better than that.
Jeez Harry really tried so hard all afternoon and took some great contested marks but but I left the game wondering if he's just plain stupid.
Charlie Curnow held every time the ball was kicked to him, every time!
The SOS miss is inexcusable. It’s the sort of rubbish that demoralises a team. I want him dropped. A ten year old could have kicked that goal.
You need to be 100 out of 100 on those shots.
Be ruthless. Drop him.
TDK was the first card to fall - Jack and Fisher arent any more deserving of a game. I'd be filthy with his misses as a forward if I was a team mate.
career goal average is pretty low at ~0.7.SOS tries super hard and I love that. The sample size is high on his goal kicking and it’s unacceptably low. Sustainably unacceptably low. For years he’s been 50 percent or less. It’s just not good enough. We have to find guys who can kick accurately. Guys like Jack Gunston.
People need to be able to cope with pressure and feedback. Yep. You miss from dead in front you’ll be dropped. So what? Get some steel. How can you cope with the pressure of taking that shot in a final if you can take the pressure of needing to nail it to keep your spot. These guys need GRIT.All the folks banging on about dropping someone for missing a set shot clearly have no idea what actually helps someone get better. Go back and watch some of the interviews Harry did last year when he was seeing some better results. He talks about working with the club psychologist on the idea that it's OK to miss some, which relieves mental pressure, relaxes the body, and gives you a better chance of actually kicking it the way you want to.
Clearly Harry, and JSOS, and Cripps, could all do with a refresher on that right now, but let's be clear. Dropping someone for a missed shot would have the exact opposite effect to what you want. Suddenly everyone knows that a bad miss could see them dropped, the pressure goes way up, and the chance of success goes down. It's a knee-jerk expression of frustration, not a solution.
If he gets dropped, his toxic old man will get in his ear and make him think that the club has it in for their entire family. Air of entitlement in that entire familyThe SOS miss is inexcusable. It’s the sort of rubbish that demoralises a team. I want him dropped. A ten year old could have kicked that goal.
You need to be 100 out of 100 on those shots.
Be ruthless. Drop him.
Kemp and Dow both say hello JabbaHard to win a game when a seven-year "senior" player misses a set shot from 20 meters out dead in front. Even harder to win a game when you are effectively playing two forwards - same issue all year. How much of that is Vossy's fault and how much of that is just lack of developed forward talent?
On Voss- good on him for playing Cowan, Hollands, and Cncotta- all new recruits - and good on him for giving Honey and LoB a run to show what they've got or haven't. All this talk of Voss favouring players- when the facts say that he is actually developing youth as much as possible - including dropping TDK.
I think Docherty and Saad in would have helped keep scoring less- but no coach can make up for Jack Silvagni unable to kick a goal - he and Fisher are dead weight losses.
It would be wonderful if it were that simple, wouldn't it? But as the saying goes, for every problem there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.People need to be able to cope with pressure and feedback. Yep. You miss from dead in front you’ll be dropped. So what? Get some steel. How can you cope with the pressure of taking that shot in a final if you can take the pressure of needing to nail it to keep your spot. These guys need GRIT.