- Aug 18, 2018
- 32,252
- 54,932
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Going off the value in trade of future firsts it sounds diabolicalHow crap is next years??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Going off the value in trade of future firsts it sounds diabolicalHow crap is next years??
There's schools of thought that next year's top end exceeds this years, but the problem is many of those top end players are already tied to clubs.How crap is next years??
Going off the value in trade of future firsts it sounds diabolical
What did he text?righto
Which one of you is Lewy from Jan Juc who just text into SEN
Mateship... a great trait to have.Anyone else notice Mitch Edwards on the Bo Allan table at the draft last night?
what ws said??righto
Which one of you is Lewy from Jan Juc who just text into SEN
He said something stupid like Wells will now pick a Brownlow medallist, 2 all Australians. Take it to the bankwhat ws said??
I agree. If the club did go down the path of trading our FF I’d trust the decision but the fact Shanahan has fallen this far suggests there are concerns that we are unaware of. Interesting to see where he ends up.
The others, Clarke, Gerreyn now look like F2 trades if we really want them. I’ve been advocating or at least accepting if we were to trade our FF. But not for these two.
He said something stupid like Wells will now pick a Brownlow medallist, 2 all Australians. Take it to the bank
I've been thinking about the irrational and over played emotion regarding the North trade here.
If North had have traded their future 1st for pick 18 would you be happier?
And let's say they still took Whitlock? What's the diff between 18 and 27 if they were focussed on the player? Answer, zero.
But lets break it down.
It's not unreasonable to suggest North finish 12th in 2025.
So, this is how it looks.
Lose - 2025 pick 6
Gain - Whitlock, 2025 pick 19.
Of course there's some risk with every draft choice.
But the trade was not stupid.
I haven’t looked much at Gerreyn… only highlights here and there.So interesting that our board seem so united on Gerreyn as a target.
Hasn't been linked to us and has largely been ignored by Cal Towmey.
Interesting to see where he lands. I like others, thought his highlights suited our needs.
I feel like all the smoke around Dodson makes it more likely that he's the first name we call out, if we do indeed trade up.
For those wondering
We think we know Wells. But he keeps pulling strings we never expect.If North spring up the ladder and there’s some early academy players or father sons their F1 could be 10+
Also could still suck as a team and it be pick 3.
In the end it all comes down to the players you select being good players.
We traded an F1 for Holmes a few years ago.
If Holmes was a dud it would lock upon as a bad trade… but he is a gun and it looks like an inspired call.
All depends on selecting the right players.
In saying that… if they have a shocker of a year, Whitlock would wanna make it.
I haven’t looked much at Gerreyn… only highlights here and there.
He has a bit of Rohan Marshall about him.
Don’t love the look of Dodson.
Ahhh in Wells we trust.
If North spring up the ladder and there’s some early academy players or father sons their F1 could be 10+
Also could still suck as a team and it be pick 3.
In the end it all comes down to the players you select being good players.
We traded an F1 for Holmes a few years ago.
If Holmes was a dud it would lock upon as a bad trade… but he is a gun and it looks like an inspired call.
All depends on selecting the right players.
In saying that… if they have a shocker of a year, Whitlock would wanna make it.
He certainly wanna be better than his non drafted brother Jack or it’ll be lol Norf.
As stupid as it looks, I imagine they're looking at it like this:If North spring up the ladder and there’s some early academy players or father sons their F1 could be 10+
Also could still suck as a team and it be pick 3.
In the end it all comes down to the players you select being good players.
We traded an F1 for Holmes a few years ago.
If Holmes was a dud it would lock upon as a bad trade… but he is a gun and it looks like an inspired call.
All depends on selecting the right players.
In saying that… if they have a shocker of a year, Whitlock would wanna make it.
He certainly wanna be better than his non drafted brother Jack or it’ll be lol Norf.
I sort of like them going hard but I still feel like they could have traded pick 3 last year for a couple of later R1 picks and perhaps had Curtin and OSullivan ..and have talls a lot more covered..
As you say …forgetting the number ..it will end up being a Whitlock V player X judgement on if they made the right call..
What did he text?
what ws said??
He said something stupid like Wells will now pick a Brownlow medallist, 2 all Australians. Take it to the bank
Yeah that looked a putrid trade by Norf.You could make the case that it will end up being Daniel or player X that determines its success.
Don't trade daniel, they have the pick to get whitlock and retain F1.
Interesting...Mateship... a great trait to have.
You pay a premium being a non competitive boutique club . I doubt Clarkson cares about picks. He wants pnp typesYou could make the case that it will end up being Daniel or player X that determines its success.
Don't trade daniel, they have the pick to get whitlock and retain F1.
No doubt.You pay a premium being a non competitive boutique club . I doubt Clarkson cares about picks. He wants pnp types