Would this have been some back 6 setup, #7 Newman..
FB: Z.Williams - Weitering - McGovern
HB: Docherty - L.Jones - Saad
FB: Z.Williams - Weitering - McGovern
HB: Docherty - L.Jones - Saad
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Is this a repost from a few years ago?Would this have been some back 6 setup, #7 Newman..
FB: Z.Williams - Weitering - McGovern
HB: Docherty - L.Jones - Saad
I think you are right. Docherty isn't needed in defence but we don't have better options for wing and even in the onball group, if he isn't in that there is probably someone playing in the middle not as good as what he is.Interesting discussion around Docherty
He could easily be our best defender, forward or mid. He is a star. He also smart and a leader
With Saad Williams Boyd Cowan Cincotta Newman all available he isn't needed in defence
With Acres Hollands & Binns he isn't really needed on a wing
I also believe he is our best option as a HF that can play well on ball. He can kick goals and play significant mid minutes. He adds run
I see his role next year as a Mid/HF changing with E.Hollands. He can also have Wing minutes and go back if needed.
Wherever he is we are better off
There won’t be a sub. So Silvagni won’t be it. I can see us playing pitto TDK and Silvagni if there is 5 on the bench. Hollands won’t play round 1-2 so no point picking him yet. Which is where Silvagni will line up. Other than that it’s pretty spot on. You could easily interchange doc on the bench to start on hollands’ wing.Assuming everyone is fit & on form this would be my starting 22
Boyd Weitering McGovern
Williams Kemp Saad
Pitto Cerra Walsh
Acres Cripps O Hollands
E Hollands Curnow Martin
Motlop McKay Fantasia
INT: TDK Newman Cottrell Hewett Doc
EMG: Kennedy Binns Silvagni Cunningham
Doc is probably controversial but hecan play multiple roles so I'd have him on the bench to come on to what ever role is resting at the time. I don't think he will be in the backline as per history this year, although it is my favourite position for him, but I'm also am not huge fan of him at CBA unless its on the wing.
Binns assuming he continues his development the way he has this year, I think has to be an emergency. He is the player who could be something on that wing or he could fall away if he doesn't continue to develop too.
Silvagni would be my SUB because he is also able to play multiple positions. It's harsh he can't get in the team but there isn't enough Bench spots.
If E. Hollands and Fantasia deliver on talent & their bodies hold up then they are starting players.
I actually think if they do deliver there is a chance Cunningham moves on at the end of the year, because I can see him playing over either of them.
I still have concerns about speed in the team so hopefully that is addressed at the draft
I didn't realise the SUB removal was confirmed, thought it was still rumours, thanks for clarifying .There won’t be a sub. So Silvagni won’t be it. I can see us playing pitto TDK and Silvagni if there is 5 on the bench. Hollands won’t play round 1-2 so no point picking him yet. Which is where Silvagni will line up. Other than that it’s pretty spot on. You could easily interchange doc on the bench to start on hollands’ wing.
I didn't realise the SUB removal was confirmed, thought it was still rumours, thanks for clarifying .
If that's the case then I agree I think Silvagni is a great option on the Bench. He can play his preferred third tall position and assist around the ground as required
Agree on Docherty, I would just prefer he stays away from CBA when possible. I think his key assets (disposal & decision making) are reduced largely when in there, and I think we need those things
It's not been confirmed. It's the preference of clubs to go to a 5 man bench. According to the media it may be implemented next season but is down the priority list. Also, worth noting that the 5 man bench was preferred by clubs this year but the afl went the tactical sub so no guarantee they get what they want.
If I had to put money on it though I would bet it happens. Definitely better then the tactical sub. I just hope clubs don't winge the moment they get an injury and are 4 on the bench vs 5. Then start asking for a 6 man bench
Silvagni can even clamp down on an oppo mid like he did with that Freo guy.I didn't realise the SUB removal was confirmed, thought it was still rumours, thanks for clarifying .
If that's the case then I agree I think Silvagni is a great option on the Bench. He can play his preferred third tall position and assist around the ground as required
Agree on Docherty, I would just prefer he stays away from CBA when possible. I think his key assets (disposal & decision making) are reduced largely when in there, and I think we need those things
txet rorrim ni etirw ot si kcirt ehTIm not posting my starting 22 because of two reasons
firstly everyone will copy mine because mine will be the best; and
secondly, I have no clue.
Seing patterns is one of the reasons we recognise shapes of objects/animals etc in clouds.Fun fact(s) - so called 'mirror' writing is seen in young children and is often misdiagnosed as a form of 'dyslexia' - in fact it is the way that Ancient Greeks wrote - from left to write and then right to left and back again...in lay terms 'called the way the Ox flows or ploughs' - did you know that human beings brains are hard-wired to see and recognise faces irrespective of the angle of the face- so for example whether presented with a right side angled view or left side angled view the same person we recognise them as the same person...
interestingly, the part of the brain that does this naturally is also the same part of the brain that recognises 'letters' or 'symbols' so as children's literacy develops and grows the ability to recognise and remember faces diminishes somewhat - what happens according to what modern imaging technology shows is that the brain actual wiring ( physiology) changes to make room for letters and symbols as we learn them literally changing the function of the brain according to need/use...
in my case with the oft quoted typage error particularly obvious in teh word teh - it is just a serious 'glitch' in my typage ability one I can no longer often be bothered to futz with on BF or anywhere else tbh...
How the Brain Learns to Read - Prof. Stanislas Dehaene
No Hewett?Newman Weitering McGovern
Williams Kemp Saad
TDK Cerra Walsh
Acres Cripps Docherty
E Hollands Curnow Martin
Motlop McKay Fantasia
INT: Boyd (HBF) Cottrell (Mr Fixit) Kennedy (Cripps) O Hollands (Wing)
EMG: Pitto Hewett Binns Silvagni Cunningham ***Probably SOS or Cunners as sub
Currently hard to be critical of posters making judgement or favourite calls at the moment. We have at least 26 candidates for our best 22. Arguably quite a few more. Hewett v Kennedy can be a legitimate value judgement. You and a few others have Boyd a lock, where I, and plenty of others do not. (I actually believe that if the club rated Boyd as you do, he, not Cotts would have been the elevated rookie). Surely the development of Cowan will get some priority, and I have Cincotta above Boyd. This doesn’t mean I do not rate or like Boyd, his kicking prowess takes him a long way. I find it hard to believe we are being linked with half backs in this draft with the Campo boys just as likely to play half back as mid after next year.No Hewett?