RCD with finding the ball tooI heard he is very slow
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
RCD with finding the ball tooI heard he is very slow
He can. He's played under 10 games. No point elevating Seth until we need to.Can Bauer be rookie again? Reckon Campbell has well and truly earned a promotion. He's a long term piece imo.
Fair, would be interesting to know what changed and why though?I dont think that is a big of an issue as many of you made it out to be.
this caper is extremely high octane this time of year and things change very quickly.
he isn't the only person talking about drafts that has had changed views over the last 3 weeks.
AFL draft central have chopped and changed, Twomey has chopped and changed, Knightmare has chopped and changed, but for some reason everyone has been fixated on attacking Cam for literally being no different to everyone else.
Clubs wants and needs change based on who is trading up pick spots.
e.g our player at 1 was probably different before carlton jumped up into pick 3. so that changed in a matter of hours.
combine results and interviews also play a part.
I truly never understood why people tried shooting him down for this when it is pretty much industry standard as the information is so dynamic.
Especially in a year with such an even draft. It's not like we have a Harley Reid type at 1 that everyone will predict correctly.
We have to elevate 1 or 2. Anyone we are forced to?He can. He's played under 10 games. No point elevating Seth until we need to.
Anything new in these articles or just rehashed stuff?
100%Fair, would be interesting to know what changed and shy though?
None forced. Bauer or Seth are most likely. Bauer because he'll play more than 2 games this year (taking him over 10, which requires an upgrade from 4th year onwards), you'd think. Seth because of performance + needing to be elevated at the end of next year anyway.We have to elevate 1 or 2. Anyone we are forced to?
Can you ask him to settle the FOS vs Jagga debate once and for all?like I put in the pod thread, I'll give fair warning here too.
Anyone trolling in the live chat will just be banned on the spot.
Like I have always said, don't have to agree with views or opinions but you do need to be respectful, especially whenever we have guests on from any walk of life.
There isnt anyone that jumps out which is a shameIf we sign a single DFA who isn’t an insurance ruck, as a rookie, I’ll spit.
We have 7 multiple premiership players left, 8 if Kamdyn stays, Taranto & Hopper. We don’t need dead space babysitters taking up precious list spots
I dont think that is a big of an issue as many of you made it out to be.
this caper is extremely high octane this time of year and things change very quickly.
he isn't the only person talking about drafts that has had changed views over the last 3 weeks.
AFL draft central have chopped and changed, Twomey has chopped and changed, Knightmare has chopped and changed, but for some reason everyone has been fixated on attacking Cam for literally being no different to everyone else.
Clubs wants and needs change based on who is trading up pick spots.
e.g our player at 1 was probably different before carlton jumped up into pick 3. so that changed in a matter of hours.
combine results and interviews also play a part.
I truly never understood why people tried shooting him down for this when it is pretty much industry standard as the information is so dynamic.
Especially in a year with such an even draft. It's not like we have a Harley Reid type at 1 that everyone will predict correctly.
If we sign a single DFA who isn’t an insurance ruck, as a rookie, I’ll spit.
We have 7 multiple premiership players left, 8 if Kamdyn stays, Taranto & Hopper. We don’t need dead space babysitters taking up precious list spots
The only one who can settle it is Blair.Can you ask him to settle the FOS vs Jagga debate once and for all?
WHY !!!!!no way I am sacrificing 6 for futures.
they want six for a reason, the players available are better than normal
WHY !!!!!
Why Not ?
If the players we rate at #6 are off the board and we are not in love with a particular player that we rate 7 or better
with picks #10 & #11 still available for the players we rate why should we just take a player we dont rate when we have options to move back to a range where we get value or above value for pick #6 and just take our #10 & #11 for the players we want.
e.g Trade pick #6 for Gws #15 , #16 , #21
Then we can either take 15 & 16 along with 10 & 11 and trade out 18 , 20 , 23 , 24 into F1's in 2025 giving Richmond 5 1st rounders under 20 and our 2nd rounder so 6 picks under 25 AGAIN !!!
whilst taking #1 , #10 , #11 , #15 , #16 this year
We cannot have tunnel vision and just think about this years draft this rebuild is going to take 3-4 years and we need 20 to draft kids coming into this club in the next 4 years to have the depth for sustained success
Pick #6 is not the holy grail
If the deal for #2 for #6 + #18 happens great if its for #6 + #20 even better but if we dont rate Smille / Langford at #6I'm of the opinion that we keep 6 & 18 for the exact reasons that North want them. Yes, they've drafted a truckload of mids over the last 5 years and have left themselves light on for quality KPP's.
We haven't had any real access to 1st round picks and need to draft in talent all over the ground, to me that means getting in bulk talent and this is the draft to do it.
Take the players at 6 & 18 that North are eyeing off.
Only club I'd trade 6 for their F1 is us.Trading out pick 6 for any F1 is just pure nonsense. We could get another 2 x F1's by using 23 & 24.
Please dont think l'm trying to shut your thinking down, l'll listen to anything (bar Mr Magic).If the deal for #2 for #6 + #18 happens great if its for #6 + #20 even better but if we dont rate Smille / Langford at #6
i rather trade it out to GWS and i wouldnt be too upset with the following haul
#1 - Lalor
#10 - Allan
#11 - Travaglia
#15 - Berry
#16 - Hotton
#18 - Hannaford
#20 - Shannahan / Faull / Gerreyn / or another player we rate
Still allows for 3 picks #21 , #23 , #24 to be traded into 2025
Only club I'd trade 6 for their F1 is us.
Happy to see your list with the picks we currently holdPlease dont think l'm trying to shut your thinking down, l'll listen to anything (bar Mr Magic).
However, if - from the draft position we currently have - we walked away with that haul, l'd probably throw up. 2 x top 6 selections and our first two are Lalor and Allen... that would just about be me done.