Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
throw in the camel you tightarsesince norf are desparate to trade back for tauru i wouldn't offer up anything more than pick 6
He's a dentistThey couldn't put Hicksy face on the camera like he's a undercover narcotics agent
Will someone do the list plsHe's a dentist
It's also got Mate Colina's one appearance at Punt Rd.Norf lurkers, this plus pick 6 could be yours for the low price of pick 2.
View attachment 2149117
The jpeg is also part of the deal and features Kane McAullifes stunning rig, sure to be a collectors item.
His back crapped out immediately after under the force of the camera shutter closing.It's also got Mate Colina's one appearance at Punt Rd.
Graham had a sub 3 sec 20m. His big issue was always the first 5m. Too slow to reactIn what world is he Jack Graham? In a 20m sprint he'd put 18.6m on Graham.
How old is Blair’s son?he sounds about 16 lol this is the guy with all the inside news fmd
Dumb ****sI think you will get a few D/F to help the kids aswell
it is not pick 6, it is access to the players at pick 6.WHY !!!!!
Why Not ?
If the players we rate at #6 are off the board and we are not in love with a particular player that we rate 7 or better
with picks #10 & #11 still available for the players we rate why should we just take a player we dont rate when we have options to move back to a range where we get value or above value for pick #6 and just take our #10 & #11 for the players we want.
e.g Trade pick #6 for Gws #15 , #16 , #21
Then we can either take 15 & 16 along with 10 & 11 and trade out 18 , 20 , 23 , 24 into F1's in 2025 giving Richmond 5 1st rounders under 20 and our 2nd rounder so 6 picks under 25 AGAIN !!!
whilst taking #1 , #10 , #11 , #15 , #16 this year
We cannot have tunnel vision and just think about this years draft this rebuild is going to take 3-4 years and we need 20 to draft kids coming into this club in the next 4 years to have the depth for sustained success
Pick #6 is not the holy grail
it is only natural GWS want pick 6 for 15 and 16, pick 6 is a far better pick, they do not accept mediocrity.If the deal for #2 for #6 + #18 happens great if its for #6 + #20 even better but if we dont rate Smille / Langford at #6
i rather trade it out to GWS and i wouldnt be too upset with the following haul
#1 - Lalor
#10 - Allan
#11 - Travaglia
#15 - Berry
#16 - Hotton
#18 - Hannaford
#20 - Shannahan / Faull / Gerreyn / or another player we rate
Still allows for 3 picks #21 , #23 , #24 to be traded into 2025
And who do you suggest we get at pick #6 i would love to know who you think is the standout at that pickit is only natural GWS want pick 6 for 15 and 16, pick 6 is a far better pick, they do not accept mediocrity.
you can get guys like Berry and Hotton in any draft over the years so why draft them at all, when you can always draft similar types later?
so it is about 6 and not 2 then?Then you not getting 2
Graham had a sub 3 sec 20m. His big issue was always the first 5m. Too slow to react
FOS has obvious quality but I think he equates to a HFF part time mid. He’s possession rate is not great but he is good with ball in hand and in the air. I just think he’s about pick 6 not 1,2. I do think Jagga is just purely a mid but thats because he works tirelessly in the middle and those types need to be rested on the bench not sent forward.He has all the qualities that make a afl star lol literally the scouting reports have him down as no weaknesses but you think a back flanker at best? Com on mate
I was under the assumption you were assuming he’s shit, my bad but nah I just don’t agree with the flanker comments you can jog back now
I used to be anti Langford due to speed but I watch him and I see qualities Now I like him.
Jagga is the only one of the seven who is completely restricted to midfield he can’t go elsewhere but I do like the kid hence why I’m all in on pick 2 to grab one of Lalor, Smith, Finn
Saints to get pick 2, thank god.
SOS to piss blues off would be worth it alone.
SOS as crazy as he is, would never swap 7,8 for 2, that's just bat shit crazy.......even if North give a future back6 days ago he said we’d be live trading for pick 2! Hicksy smoking to much of the pipe the little campaigner
Im a NO to trading #10 + #11SOS as crazy as he is, would never swap 7,8 for 2, that's just bat shit crazy.......even if North give a future back
and Demons aren't swapping 5,9 for 2......... why would they? have already given up their F1
Rawlings said BEFORE they traded 25 & 44 that they'll swap 2 for a small slide back
now that they've only got 2, 62 that changes things a lot
swapping 6 + ? for 2, would be insane, we have all the cards.........why fold?
as good as having 1 and 2 is, we hold the best hand in the game (1, 6, 10, 11, 18, 20, 23 all 1st Rd's)
no one else has the chips that we have for dealing pick 2..........not even GWS 15, 16, 21 would be tempting for 2
10 & 11 is plenty for 2 (better than 12, 14 for 3)..........keep 1, 6, 18, 20, 23 and 24
means we go to the draft with 1, 2, 6, 18, 20, 23 and 24
1, 2, 6............we get 3 of Lalor, FOS, Draper, Langford, Smillie and Smith (the so called top 6)
18, 20, 23.......... we draft KP's or runners?
trade 24 to the highest bidder
draft 5 or at most 6 depending on who is left and whether we really rate them
i KNOW people will say Norf won't go for it, but what happens if they have no choice (like WC)
the worst that can happen is we make them use 2 and miss out on the flying Viking, or they take him that high
who cares........i don't
View attachment 2149237
what Blues traded for pick 3
View attachment 2149260
SOS as crazy as he is, would never swap 7,8 for 2, that's just bat shit crazy.......even if North give a future back
and Demons aren't swapping 5,9 for 2......... why would they? have already given up their F1
Rawlings said BEFORE they traded 25 & 44 that they'll swap 2 for a small slide back
now that they've only got 2, 62 that changes things a lot
swapping 6 + ? for 2, would be insane, we have all the cards.........why fold?
as good as having 1 and 2 is, we hold the best hand in the game (1, 6, 10, 11, 18, 20, 23 all 1st Rd's)
no one else has the chips that we have for dealing pick 2..........not even GWS 15, 16, 21 would be tempting for 2
10 & 11 is plenty for 2 (better than 12, 14 for 3)..........keep 1, 6, 18, 20, 23 and 24
means we go to the draft with 1, 2, 6, 18, 20, 23 and 24
1, 2, 6............we get 3 of Lalor, FOS, Draper, Langford, Smillie and Smith (the so called top 6)
18, 20, 23.......... we draft KP's or runners?
trade 24 to the highest bidder
draft 5 or at most 6 depending on who is left and whether we really rate them
i KNOW people will say Norf won't go for it, but what happens if they have no choice (like WC)
the worst that can happen is we make them use 2 and miss out on the flying Viking, or they take him that high
who cares........i don't
View attachment 2149237
what Blues traded for pick 3
View attachment 2149260
yeah, i get what you're saying but Lalor and FOS aren't slouches when it comes to speed and agilityIm a NO to trading #10 + #11
If we have #1 + #2 we have already taken the cream of the top end crop Lalot & FOS hopefully
why have another mid in that range when we can take 2 players like Hotton & Berry that offer speed agility in both Mid/FWD either of these kids actually have the talent to become best out of this draft
I would much rather have the
FOS - Lalor - Hotton - Berry combination with our 4 picks 1,2,10,11