In Blair I fully trustIt’s likely top 5 and definitely top 10. Gives us plenty of flexibility if a certain eagle bails a year early to play with his vic country mates
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
In Blair I fully trustIt’s likely top 5 and definitely top 10. Gives us plenty of flexibility if a certain eagle bails a year early to play with his vic country mates
#6 & #24 is way unders for #2Nah, 6 & 24 should be the deal for 2, means we're giving 11 for F1, not worth it
Feel like Saints would take TauruI am starting to think this way also.
Nth desperate for another first round pick.
Richmond are not desperate for pick 2.
Tauru should be there at pick 10.
So Richmond should have a take it or leave approach and offer 10 & 18 for pick 2.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
1 Lalor
7 Jagga
12 Travaglia
14 Armstrong
22 Trainor
24 Dodson
28 Dattoli
Would settle for that
Saints will be dreaming of Smillie & Armstrong double ( 7 & 8 )Reckon it'll be a fair bit different to that, I really don't like Travaglia, Armstrong, Trainor and Dodson at those picks, there'll be a better mix come draft night. Saints could take Travaglia & Armstrong, leaving Lindsay, Allan, Hotton, Berry for us.
True and i agreeIf I'm going to plant my flag to any phantom draft/form guide it's always going to be Cal Twomey's.
It's been a rare occasion where he misses a top 10 selection.
#itsFOSoclock
IMO we hold the whip hand here, 6 & 23 should be our one and only offer.#6 & #24 is way unders for #2
I see Norths F1 as a pick between #5-#7 next year
1 Lalor
7 Jagga
12 Travaglia
14 Armstrong
22 Trainor
24 Dodson
28 Dattoli
Would settle for that
They’re gunna get em back when they’re in their window!Why would they trade all their members? The club would fold
We're trading Norf's F1 for Cadman.Yep, didn’t think of it that way but even now, 18 for their F1 in a weaker draft. Would need to really think about it as we could still get a very very good player at 18
So you'd knock back pick 2 this year and a top 4 pick next year. Even if North win 6 or 7 games it leaves them in bottom 4 territory.Its such a risky play.
I wouldnt offer any more than 6,18,24, even then, I dont like it for us
I'd do that deal every day of the week. 6 and 18 for 2 is fine. 24 for an all but guaranteed top 6 pick? no dramas.Its such a risky play.
I wouldnt offer any more than 6,18,24, even then, I dont like it for us
I think it was F1 for #13 plus they wanted a late pick as well but GC were not interested in thatIMO we hold the whip hand here, 6 & 23 should be our one and only offer.
I certainly wouldn't give up 11 this year, North shopped F1 & F2 for 13.
10 & 11 back to back are too valuable to us, especially being at the back end of the second tier of players in this draft.So you'd knock back pick 2 this year and a top 4 pick next year. Even if North win 6 or 7 games it leaves them in bottom 4 territory.
I'd say the deal for those picks would be for nothing less than 6,11 18/23.
North's future first is more valuable than any other teams other than maybe west coast but they will be using there 1st for Warner.
The other bottom teams from this year have the potential to make the 8.
Sent from my SM-A156E using Tapatalk
6 , 11 , 23 would be the max i would paySo you'd knock back pick 2 this year and a top 4 pick next year. Even if North win 6 or 7 games it leaves them in bottom 4 territory.
I'd say the deal for those picks would be for nothing less than 6,11 18/23.
North's future first is more valuable than any other teams other than maybe west coast but they will be using there 1st for Warner.
The other bottom teams from this year have the potential to make the 8.
Sent from my SM-A156E using Tapatalk
No he didn't. He said that's the most he would give, and that there's no need for us to give more.Cal said he would not trade 6 and 18 for 2
Bring cash. No IOUs.6 , 11 , 23 would be the max i would pay
have to look at it this way , There are no teams that have the picks that want to trade out of this years draft into next year and certainly no team that has a pick before GWS picks 15,16,21 and they want to trade up into this draft not trade out into this year so the there are not many takers.
If Richmond give up #11 for your F1 then they will pay less for your #2 this year so #6 , #11 , #23 would be best from Richmond imo.
Nah i'll transfer into accountBring cash
Lots of requests recently for more vision of Sam Lalor. Given his injury restricted 2024 season we have to go back to 2023 when he was a bottom ager. Here we see him putting in a remarkably powerful game as an inside midfielder given he's a year younger than most of his opponents, bulldozing through stoppage or crunching in with tackling pressure. He found plenty of the footy, but was uncharacteristically a bit variable with his disposal.
That's a bald face lie as I just watched Gettable and he said he wouldn't do any more than 6 and 18 for 2. Which means he would do 6 and 18 for 2.Cal said he would not trade 6 and 18 for 2
And really thats exactly what the value isThat's a bald face lie as I just watched Gettable and he said he wouldn't do any more than 6 and 18 for 2. Which means he would do 6 and 18 for 2.
This was what was being offered for 13....I think it was F1 for #13 plus they wanted a late pick as well but GC were not interested in that
#6 + #18 is fair value for pick #2 imo but hey if its 6 +23 im not complaining but doubt that happens if we are serious about getting #2