Technically that's right. More accurately it gets us one of FOS and Lalor, and one of the other four.1 and 6 is a bloody good hand. Gets us two of FOS, Lalor, Smith, Smillie, Draper, Langford.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Technically that's right. More accurately it gets us one of FOS and Lalor, and one of the other four.1 and 6 is a bloody good hand. Gets us two of FOS, Lalor, Smith, Smillie, Draper, Langford.
Maybe copy paste so we can see what it sayshttps://www.heraldsun.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=HSWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-draft-2024-levi-ashcroft-on-motivation-big-moments-and-the-prospect-of-being-a-no-1-pick/news-story/a26080add1f088fa5bfa255bd9ff6b74&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-1-NOSCORE
Why would we entertain this unless there was a chance of him coming to us?
Could it be manager Shenanggans trying to strong-arm Richmond in delivering their client a number 1 pick. This mean deals and great PR for both Levi and the lions.
I would be dumb founded we bid on him at 1 given it says to Lalor or FOS we dont rate you as highly as Levi....
i just read the title and some some one mentioned it in the tiger cast comments.Maybe copy paste so we can see what it says
It's not worth reading. Essentially a puff piece on Levi Ashcroft.Maybe copy paste so we can see what it says
Just bid on him for being s d ~ckIt's not worth reading. Essentially a puff piece on Levi Ashcroft.
We were going to speak to him at the draft combine apparently but he missed it due to shoulder issues.
They claim we want to talk to him in the event that we want to bid on him.
Nothing else interesting.
No chance we bid on Levi with pick 1. Pick 2 (if we have it) possibly, but still unlikely IMO.https://www.heraldsun.com.au/subscribe/news/1/?sourceCode=HSWEB_WRE170_a_GGL&dest=https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-draft-2024-levi-ashcroft-on-motivation-big-moments-and-the-prospect-of-being-a-no-1-pick/news-story/a26080add1f088fa5bfa255bd9ff6b74&memtype=anonymous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-1-NOSCORE
Why would we entertain this unless there was a chance of him coming to us?
Could it be manager Shenanggans trying to strong-arm Richmond in delivering their client a number 1 pick. This mean deals and great PR for both Levi and the lions.
I would be dumb founded we bid on him at 1 given it says to Lalor or FOS we dont rate you as highly as Levi....
Sounds like an intelligent thing to do ???Blocking and reporting every post that has us taking either Whitlock brother, you’ve been warned.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Out of Interest How does NorF end up with #2 , #15 , #16 ?
There is no way on earth that GWS trade out #15 + #16 for NorF's F1
2 reasons and 1st is GWS actually are trying to move up the pick's they have into a top 10 pick
2nd Even if they do the F1 is only worth 1 of the 2 picks
* I would actually see what we could do with GWS as a trade for #10 for #15 + #16
Why panicked ?Hello old friend
Just checking in to make sure you are ok.
The post above seems panicked.
It’s almost over
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/subscr...ous&mode=premium&v21=GROUPA-Segment-1-NOSCORE
Why would we entertain this unless there was a chance of him coming to us?
Could it be manager Shenanggans trying to strong-arm Richmond in delivering their client a number 1 pick. This mean deals and great PR for both Levi and the lions.
I would be dumb founded we bid on him at 1 given it says to Lalor or FOS we dont rate you as highly as Levi....
Still find it odd North would be so transparent that everyone supposedly knows they must have Tauru. A few months ago it was Trainor, and those concussion issues didn’t appear overnight
Maybe we’re all guessing.
I just don't see club handing over the value you're expecting for our late R1 picks, which isn't a bad thing as well get quality players in that range. Where we can cash in is the picks in the 6-11 range, but it seems people are too scared to pull the trigger on doing that.There seems to be a lot of very good players available at all of our picks in the 2024 draft. Damn.
So our default position should always be we take the picks this year. Having that default position makes us the house. If someone wants any of those picks, they need to be giving us clear reasons to pass up our favoured player and instead sell them the pick.
Because we are the house, clubs will be coming to us with clear reasons to hand them a valuable pick so they can get a player they really like into their club in 2024. Their are no fair deals here. That moment has passed. We have a virtual monopoly. We are the house. We take our 8 picks at the draft. Or we end up with a position that is clearly better than that. Those are the only two outcomes that should be possible here. Not maybe better, not a good chance to be better, IS better, end of. Don't bitch, don't grumble, don't negotiate. Pay the price we ask or say hello to the door. We are the house.
You really do have an issue with people having an opinion that is different to yours don't you.
North have had issues with the trade for need part for at least a decade.People are assuming North will take a Tall regardless if the keep pick 2. I say no way they would. Thursfield came from our system. Draft for talent, trade for need. Having said that, I really do believe they will trade pick 2. If they get pick 6 they still get best available talent at 6 which will likely be a Tall which they need, then best talent again with their next pick etc. I have no doubt we will come to an agreement with them at some stage. The deal just needs to be fair for both parties.
I just don't see club handing over the value you're expecting for our late R1 picks, which isn't a bad thing as well get quality players in that range. Where we can cash in is the picks in the 6-11 range, but it seems people are too scared to pull the trigger on doing that.
North have had issues with the trade for need part for at least a decade.
Should be easier once they start to climb the ladder but without KPP it just hasn't looked like happening.
I could imagine both Kingsley and Goodwin would come across pretty full on and serious , not sure that’s my impression of ooze, not sure what conclusion your trying to drawView attachment 2152900
So is Yze not switched on or did he not interview Jagga?
Cheese platters and ‘serious’ coach chats as Dusty question stumps star: Inside AFL draft interviews
Cheese platters and ‘weird’ questions that leave prospects ‘stunned’: Inside AFL draft chatswww.foxsports.com.au
The difference is high quality players will always choose a big Melbourne club over north. This means they can’t have the same strategy as Richmond. They need to draft for certain positions as even free agents go elsewhere for less than what north offer.People are assuming North will take a Tall regardless if the keep pick 2. I say no way they would. Thursfield came from our system. Draft for talent, trade for need. Having said that, I really do believe they will trade pick 2. If they get pick 6 they still get best available talent at 6 which will likely be a Tall which they need, then best talent again with their next pick etc. I have no doubt we will come to an agreement with them at some stage. The deal just needs to be fair for both parties.
I could imagine both Kingsley and Goodwin would come across pretty full on and serious , not sure that’s my impression of ooze, not sure what conclusion your trying to draw
They may entice quality if they were a contender for a flag, but they are a fair way from that.The difference is high quality players will always choose a big Melbourne club over north. This means they can’t have the same strategy as Richmond. They need to draft for certain positions as even free agents go elsewhere for less than what north offer.
Spot on!Not to mention draft for talent and trade for need is a perfect world strategy for list management. Teams are studying the US sports codes for list building and adopting more complex strategies beyond creating logjams of talent.
If the deal is 6&11 for 2&F1 then absolutely we should do that... its a steal!What if the player we have at 2 isn't head and shoulders ahead of the player at 6?
Do you still want to trade out an extra R1 pick to move up to 2?
I agree with all of this but I have already said Im aware of what North NEED , every man & their dog knows what they need and its also no secret who they are after.
The point was purely that they dont rate him enough to be 'best available' which is what clubs tend to do with such high picks.
Right now is the same as when North valued trading pick 1 (Cadman) for 2 early picks (Sheezel,Wardlaw) so they had their chance to sort out getting their tall but chose
IMO the better option.
Why would we give up 2 good picks for 1 & do the complete opposite?
Every option we need will be availble @ every pick we have.
Simply put, the player they want will be there at #2 but they want more so stuff'em.
I'm also against any trade helping North out that involves #6 and if I'm being honest I'm against anything that helps North full stop!