You back on the drink again ...........................Hold my ...
Not gonna end well
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
You back on the drink again ...........................Hold my ...
Dusty , Cripps & Bont all in the same teama midfield of lalor, smillie & allan would be hilarious if, in the unlikely event, all 3 were to become stars. 3 beasts. i say unlikely not because i think they're worse than other prospects, historically it's just more likely only 1 or 2 of them would become stars, ****in better not be 0
Never does...guilty as charged!You back on the drink again ...........................
Not gonna end well
Dusty , Cripps & Bont all in the same team
Why must you ruin everything !!!Think it’s more Petracca, Tom Green and Yeo.
Bumped.
Is the difference between smillie and FOS that big?
I agreeIt was a problem they thought they could fix with Corey Ellis and RCD. They were wrong. For a midfielder I can’t think of a greater concern. More often than not it’s just not fixable.
For what, 13 and 29? I'm pretty sure GCS have their future firstIn talks with Port at the moment re: Pick 10
I’m not entirely sure yet. Will keep you posted.For what, 13 and 29? I'm pretty sure GCS have their future first
At this rate, by the time the draft comes around Jagga will slide to a SPP train on.Hear me out. There's a world in which we trade 10 and 18 for pick 2 and Norf still get Tauru and Armstrong. This is where the evenness of this draft works for both of us.
1. Lalor (RI)
2. Ashcroft (BR)
3. FOS (RI)
4. Draper (CA)
5. Langford (AD)
6. Lombard (GC)
7. Reid (ME)
8. Smillie (RI)
9. Lindsay (St K)
10. Travaglia (St K)
11. Allan (ME)
12. Tauru (NM)
13. Hotton (RI)
14. Smith (WC)
15. Kako (ES)
16. Berry (PA)
17. Hannaford (FR)
18. Shanahan (GWS)
19. Hynes (GWS)
20. Trainor (WB)
21. Armstrong (NM)
22. Dattoli (SY)
23. J. Whitlock (RI)
24. Marshall (BR)
25. Gross (GWS)
26. Davis (SY)
27. M. Whitlock (RI)
28. Faull (ES) (trade an F1 and pick 40ish to us for this)
29. Oliver (WB)
30-39. A.Bunchaduds (Loser Clubs)
40. A.Champion (RI)
Send in the ticket, Sonny.
Yes and at the end of the day Brisbane get Ashcroft for pick 20,so no matter where he gets bid on, they originally used a pick 20 to get a top 3 pick.Umm that’s the point. Bidding players go lower than expected.
It's a strange one. We don't have any more list spots to take more than 8 picks. Would have to be part of something else.For what, 13 and 29? I'm pretty sure GCS have their future first
It'll be a very short chat.lolFor what, 13 and 29? I'm pretty sure GCS have their future first
St Kilda has told clubs it is open to splitting one of its top-10 selections in this year’s draft as part of a strategy to capitalise on the depth in this year’s talent pool.
The Saints have picks seven and eight in this year’s draft and have indicated they could be interested in trading one of them for two picks later in the first round.
The two clubs best-placed to do a deal with the Saints are Richmond (which has 18, 20 and 23) and GWS Giants (15, 16 and 21).
This article contains features which are only available in the web versionTake me there
It means the Saints could take a top-line midfielder at pick seven and then snare two players in the back-end of the first-round with its Josh Battle compensation selection.
It would be a bold call from the Saints but recruiters are excited about the level of talent on offer through the back end of the first-round.
The move would effectively see the Saints take three players potentially inside the top-20 of a draft scouts are calling the strongest in several years.
St Kilda may also pull the trigger on draft night, depending on what players are available at pick seven and eight and what deals the Giants and Tigers are prepared to complete.
However, the article never mentions the saints are looking to move up to pick 2, only that they want more picks in the 1st round. No doubt posters will put 2 and 2 together and get 5. LOL
If it's 10 for 13 and 29 it may make sense if we think the guy we want will still be there at 13.It'll be a very short chat.lol
Trade back 3 spots for rubbish 29If it's 10 for 13 and 29 it may make sense if we think the guy we want will still be there at 13.
It would only really be WC we'd have to worry about.
I'm trying to process how this makes sense for us? It can only mean a shuffle back?In talks with Port at the moment re: Pick 10
Don't think they have an F1 do they? Don't GC have it?I'm trying to process how this makes sense for us? It can only mean a shuffle back?
Maybe Ports first and future first? We don't actually need more picks in this draft.
I don't understand why we'd be prepared to shuffle back.
I already feel the headache coming on.
Correct- traded it for LukoDon't think they have an F1 do they? Don't GC have it?
Shit you're right. Yeah I'm stumped.Don't think they have an F1 do they? Don't GC have it?
Don't see what Port has to offer that we'd want. They don’t have a F1, we don't need 29 and the only way we'd entertain swapping 10 for 13 (plus something) would be if they want to pick up a slider live on draft night.