List Mgmt. 2024 Draft - Post Trade Period Edition

[TigerRoar2012]

I'm still steadfast in my belief that we will trade for pick 2.
Cal may have the bat phone to the AFL and the clubs but I'd prefer to approach it from a common sense standpoint.

North need to fill I believe 3 or 4 list spots.
They also delisted Pink only to promise to re-rookie him to open up one of those list spots.
There's also ZERO chance they are filling those list spots via the rookie draft.

Yes, sure, there's every chance another club could facilitate a trade for their F1, but if that was the case, why haven't they as yet?

I'm willing to say that we'll end up with pick 2 and North's F1.

I donno mate, Cal is the best in the business with this stuff. If he says it’s not on, then it’s likely not on.

 

[sregit]

Will never happen for the following reasons;
1.we have 8 list spots to fill
2. FOS is not worth losing 6,10 &11 in the scenario above
3. Blair says we will use our picks, we swap only 23 into next year
4. Nest year is a much weaker draft after pick 10

I agree FOS is not worth trading to pick 2. We’d still have 6 picks inside the top 24, 1st pick in the Rookie draft and train on/PSD. That fills 8 spots. Next year I would bet Ric, Nth , ESS and possibly Mel F1 picks are in the top 10.

 

[sregit]

Maybe, but doesn’t leave time draft night to explore others.
Sure we consolidate now if we are sure.

Not true. Pick trades can be lodged before Richmond goes on the clock for pick 1.

 

[THE THIN MAN]

You know what, I'll take 2nd place.

 

[sregit]

Port Adelaide zeroing in on either Shanahan or J Whitlock with their first pick.

If we want Shanahan, we will need to use 10 or 11.

Pass.

 

[Coach_Required]

Fixed

FOS is gonna be a dud. Feel it in my bones.

 

[of unsound mind]

This obsession with talls to be taken with our later picks is bemusing.
I feel like I'm missing something.

Talls are a crapshoot.
Rare to confidently predict a gun while they are still growing into their size. Armstrong looks the best, but still not sure he would make a #1 forward. There are promising talls throughout this draft though. We will get a couple at the right picks.

 

[of unsound mind]

FOS is gonna be a dud. Feel it in my bones.

If you say it enough times do you think it will come true?

 

[Noidnadroj]

I’m asking for those with more knowledge than me in this space…. I’ve read a few ‘pre-draft’ reviews of Jhye Clark and it sounds very similar to Jagga … contested ball winner, classy, leadership, highly consistent, certain 250-game player etc…

Now I know it’s early days for Clark, but he’s 2 x seasons in and I think there’d be a few mild concerns with his development given he was such a high pick.

Is Jagga streets ahead of Clark at the same stage all things considered, and if so what attributes does Jagga have that Clark didn’t show in his U18 seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Mr Magic]

I’m asking for those with more knowledge than me in this space…. I’ve read a few ‘pre-draft’ reviews of Jhye Clark and it sounds very similar to Jagga … contested ball winner, classy, leadership, highly consistent, certain 250-game player etc…

Now I know it’s early days for Clark, but he’s 2 x seasons in and I think there’d be a few mild concerns with his development given he was such a high pick.

Is Jagga streets ahead of Clark at the same stage all things considered, and if so what attributes does Jagga have that Clark didn’t show in his U18 seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Speaking of Clarke, do no mind the look and story of Angus Clarke. As Lids said, one of his boys, like the way he goes about it. Would not be a bad thing if we brought in a couple of SA boys like Clarke and Dobson late.

I like the look of Thomas Simms to, could be a good value fit for RFC

 

[wegetpumped]

I dunno, worst case we end up with Lalor and Smile, right? That's got to be absolute worst case.

Unexpected picks by North or Melbourne make it more likely it's Lalor and Langford or even Lalor and Jagga.

Or we trade to North and get Lalor and FOS and lose pick 11.

Can't be too unhappy with those options.

I agree but hindsight is another beast and what we end up with could be totally different to what we want. Like you said circumstances will dictate the draft.

 

[wegetpumped]

I’m asking for those with more knowledge than me in this space…. I’ve read a few ‘pre-draft’ reviews of Jhye Clark and it sounds very similar to Jagga … contested ball winner, classy, leadership, highly consistent, certain 250-game player etc…

Now I know it’s early days for Clark, but he’s 2 x seasons in and I think there’d be a few mild concerns with his development given he was such a high pick.

Is Jagga streets ahead of Clark at the same stage all things considered, and if so what attributes does Jagga have that Clark didn’t show in his U18 seasons?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

Don't know what to think as pros and most here have gone from Jagger to fos to draper to Lalor for number one and wonder who the next one is next of the block. I feel no one in or not in the know has any idea what is going to happen. The sooner the better as it's starting to do my head in lol.

 

[NZ_Tiger]

For mine lalor no1 absolutely, interesting the thought of smith sliding to 6 he may well do and offers genuine contrast to what we got and also how lalor plays . If not I reckon Langford is our man , offers versatility that smilie doesn’t have , langers could make it as a HF in mould of caddy with his elite marking and kicking

Langford>smillie. I think he has more tools to make it at afl level. There’s a lot of risk with smilie and I could see him dropping out of the top 10.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Coach_Required]

If you say it enough times do you think it will come true?

No different to everyone else here flogging themselves off over these players. History says most of our picks will be duds.

 

[Mr Magic]

Langford>smillie. I think he has more tools to make it at afl level. There’s a lot of risk with smilie and I could see him dropping out of the top 10.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

i agree, Smillie could get to pick 13 even possibly before someone takes a punt, or maybe slightly further

It is just my perspective but Smillies combination might work with youngsters growing but with fully grown males I am not 100 percent of his role and is he too much of a in-betweener??

One could move into different roles but are his traits good enough for those roles competitively to make a difference.

To me he does some things good for a 195cm player but he will be competing against different types with size and in other roles is he good enough? His strengths are almost the opposite of your typical player at that height which is intriguing but is it effective at the highest level?