rfctigerarmy
🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆
I'm looking forward to hearing peoples opinionsnot all heroes wear capes!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm looking forward to hearing peoples opinionsnot all heroes wear capes!!!
Unbelievable the oppos.where is the "draft winners and loosers " mb thread
oh thats right Richmond won the draft so nobody made one
"opinions" key word LOLI'm looking forward to hearing peoples opinions
You'd imagine North will naturally improve with more games for their young kids but realistically when you look at what they bought in to their club versus others around the mark I don't see how they're going to rise much higher than 15-16th.
Norf- FOS, Whitlock (unlikely to play), Darling, Parker, Konstanty & Daniel
Melb- get Petracca and Oliver back more full time, Langford, Lindsay
Adel- cumming, Neal bullen, peatling, Draper, welsh
West coast- graham, baker, owies, allen, Shanahan, gross
Best case for them is finishing about 10th - that's going from 2 wins to 10 wins and a massive step forward.
Pick 9 for 27 and a future 2nd that once academies/FA are done, will be about 30 next year. Nobody is giving up a top 10 pick for 2 picks after 25 so we can't lose this trade.
Realistically I think it'll look like pick 5 for 27&30 with only Essendon, West Coast, Saints and us likely to be on par or below them.
tom elliot saying laura kane told all 18 clubs that they have to have at least 1 woman in the draft rooms and we just wheeled out ellie mckenzie and another club just brought in one of their female membership workers
fmd this wanka laura kane needs to go
Why is no one responding"opinions" key word LOL
Why is no one responding
Foxtel have picked up a beauty here.I'm sick of fooking shifter
The system is workingFoxtel have picked up a beauty here.
This draft you couldn't lose unless your norf or ess.Like West Coast and Port’s drafting with the picks they had
Think we've come too the conclusion Sampson if he comes on it'll be as a Ruckman.Absolutely don’t want to post negatively at the moment, we’ve had a beyond terrific draft, but funnily enough we have way too many key forwards on the list now. Who would have ever thought we’d ever be in this position after so many years of crying out for 1 key forward. Does Sims project closer to a ruck that can go forward than a forward that can chop out in the ruck? Happy to be educated on this, I don’t know Sims well enough. Easy to say he can replace Samson, but he’s under contract for another 3 years. At the moment he’s our back up ruck for the foreseeable future.
Fawcett kind of has to be delisted next year. He's a low pick and we’ve just drafted 3 from important draft positions. Seems very harsh.
I never envisaged us going so tall. However I think our talls bring different skill sets, so overall we’ve ticked a lot of boxes. Trainor for example, could be a very good running option of hbI guess I see this as a high risk high reward draft result.
Lalor = floor very good, ceiling ELITE
Smillie = floor good, ceiling ELITE
Hotton = floor no future, ceiling ELITE
Faull = Floor Solid, Ceiling very good
Trainor = Floor Concussed, Ceiling ELITE
Armstrong = Floor Solid, Ceiling ELITE
Sims = Floor ?, Ceiling Good to very good ruck forward
Alger = Floor solid, ceiling very good
Balance (including duplicates where they play 2 positions)
3 mids
3 tall forwards
1 tall back
1 ruck
2 small forwards
So a lot of talent, the spine looks good to elite. Great midfield core. So much élite level talent. Lots of risks in some players
Very much as Blair said this is about picking a premiership team. So he's gone for high ceiling first and then manageable risks.
It can go very wrong this draft - with multiple players just being wasted.
But the level of talent is amazing 4 * top 5 level talents, 1 more top 10, then the rest first round quality. Just WOW!
You know all clubs had to have a female in the room100% she is a woke appointment.
I dont think we would have if the draft wasnt so Tall heavy after the top 10.I never envisaged us going so tall. However I think our talls bring different skill sets, so overall we’ve ticked a lot of boxes. Trainor for example, could be a very good running option of hb
1 big hard at it kpf the other more a 3rd tall lead up type.
And then the perfect 2nd ruck/kpf.
Also realistically we have 3 drafts to fulfill all our list néeds, I am warming to Blairs strategy of getting the book ends in place, because talls always take longer.
An absolute disgrace. Clubs are only allowed 10 in the ‘war room’. This means most clubs had to leave out of the room a young recruiting team member who’d spent the year watching U18 and school games all over the country …. and they finally get to their big day to celebrate their hard work… and have to sit outside the room while a token female sits in the corner like a naughty toddler.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
I was scoffing at all the mock drafts that linked us with so many talls, 2 tops I thought. How wrong I was!!!I dont think we would have if the draft wasnt so Tall heavy after the top 10.
I dont think we would have if the draft wasnt so Tall heavy after the top 10.
Same, but makes sense, build the spine first.I was scoffing at all the mock drafts that linked us with so many talls, 2 tops I thought. How wrong I was!!!
But as I said, I’m warming to it, because I know we’ll have multiple drafts to fix other list needs.
It’s a good point you make, after the top 10 there was just so many good talls.
its a shame none of our draftees will play for 3-4 years