Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm in a very similar scenario with slightly less budget.So it's Thursday and I still have Lachie Neale as one of my trade ins this week, despite the fact he's a very good chance to be Windhagered.
Is this still the best option to bring in for D.Wilson and Oliver
$1.77mil for 2 players
(17 available next week prior to trades, so don't think I can trade in any R15 premiums, so only looking at R12 and R13).
Rozee and Zorko
LDU/Houston and Butters
Neale and J.Clark
View attachment 2018462
Freijah UTL
No thoughts about him at all before his 132Wow, the seduction of Simpkin's 132 is amazing - so many trading him in - wonder what their thoughts were before he scored the 132?
He's gotta do it more than once a season ....another look on Simpkin, his price won't blow outWow, the seduction of Simpkin's 132 is amazing - so many trading him in - wonder what their thoughts were before he scored the 132?
It's pretty irrelevant really. A break even of 33, at a time where downgrade options are few and far between and we're saving cash for Uber premiums like Gulden and Zorko, he's a handy bye player to cover a red dot like a Garcia that is languishing on the bench, too low a price to be a notable upgrade. Can cover red dots over the next two week and makes close to 70k if he averages 85 across the next two, trade after the byes are over priced at 650k+Wow, the seduction of Simpkin's 132 is amazing - so many trading him in - wonder what their thoughts were before he scored the 132?
Extra Trade on the bye round means you can cash Powell (equally iffy player) for himWow, the seduction of Simpkin's 132 is amazing - so many trading him in - wonder what their thoughts were before he scored the 132?
It's pretty irrelevant really. A break even of 33, at a time where downgrade options are few and far between and we're saving cash for Uber premiums like Gulden and Zorko, he's a handy bye player to cover a red dot like a Garcia that is languishing on the bench, too low a price to be a notable upgrade. Can cover red dots over the next two week and makes close to 70k if he averages 85 across the next two, trade after the byes are over priced at 650k+
Had him as a possible at the start of the year, so I do hold some bias toward him, positive bias. I'm really pleased for him, he's their Captain and they just played an undermanned West Coast. He's had 8 games though for 3 of them in the 40's, 1 in the 50's, 2 in the 60's. 1 in the 80's and that hail Mary of a 132. Hope he tons up again - against an undermanned Collingwood no less. Then Melbourne. Love a good low BE as much as the next coach, but it still seems like a seduction to me (of the AFL Fantasy variety ).It's pretty irrelevant really. A break even of 33, at a time where downgrade options are few and far between and we're saving cash for Uber premiums like Gulden and Zorko, he's a handy bye player to cover a red dot like a Garcia that is languishing on the bench, too low a price to be a notable upgrade. Can cover red dots over the next two week and makes close to 70k if he averages 85 across the next two, trade after the byes are over priced at 650k+
Problem is, Peatling was out of the side a week or two ago when Kelly and Cogs were both out. Job security still seems very shaky there.Completely agree with all comments and upside is he retains his midfield role and can stay at D6 given there's not many other options putting their hand up.
I have the same views about Peatling. Could average 80-90 whilst Coniglio is out. Could keep is midfield rotations if he plays well.
Currently Clohesy > Simpkin
Oliver > Peatling
Soligo > Serong
Have Touk Miller however think more important Soligo goes first, especially with a few players on the bye next week.
Also considering T Green and Rozee however Peatling/Simpkin provide great cover, cash generation an ability to be D5/D6 for a few weeks.
All i need is a couple of weeks of him with his confidence up and about and fit and healthy. Fingers crossed.Had him as a possible at the start of the year, so I do hold some bias toward him, positive bias. I'm really pleased for him, he's their Captain and they just played an undermanned West Coast. He's had 8 games though for 3 of them in the 40's, 1 in the 50's, 2 in the 60's. 1 in the 80's and that hail Mary of a 132. Hope he tons up again - against an undermanned Collingwood no less. Then Melbourne. Love a good low BE as much as the next coach, but it still seems like a seduction to me.
View attachment 2018600
Waiting a week puts a 6 in front of his price tag and it becomes much harder to digest.He's gotta do it more than once a season ....another look on Simpkin, his price won't blow out
Hope you get it - everyone hopes they get it!All i need is a couple of weeks of him with his confidence up and about and fit and healthy. Fingers crossed.
Too risky in that caseWaiting a week puts a 6 in front of his price tag and it becomes much harder to digest.
It's now or never I reckon.
Byes insulate the risk.Too risky in that case
Something about LDU just scares me off.There was a lot of LDU chat last week, and I think there's a decent argument to potentially pick him again this week. His next month is very favorable for North mids.
This week: undermanned Pies potentally without Naicos if he's rested
Next week: undermanned Dees midfield minus Trac, consisting of an unfit Clarry and an invisible and regressing Viney and rotating third mid (Sparrow, Rivers, Kozzy)
R16: The Dogs you never know what you might get
R17: Suns at Marvel, they forget how to play well when not at the GC.
Wow, the seduction of Simpkin's 132 is amazing - so many trading him in - wonder what their thoughts were before he scored the 132?
Yeah that’s always been my thing but I’m short on options around that 850 mark as most have byes next week or on byes.Something about LDU just scares me off.
I'm not sure how comfortable I'd feel paying $800k+ for a North player.
Unless the player is Sheazel of course.
Some days they'll get thumped and needing 95+ from a North player for it to be a pass mark is a steep ask. He'll need some big ceiling scores to smooth out the odd 70-80 in a belting.
Gotta remember he’s had his third concussion in less than a year and had that thumb injuryHad him as a possible at the start of the year, so I do hold some bias toward him, positive bias. I'm really pleased for him, he's their Captain and they just played an undermanned West Coast. He's had 8 games though for 3 of them in the 40's, 1 in the 50's, 2 in the 60's. 1 in the 80's and that hail Mary of a 132. Hope he tons up again - against an undermanned Collingwood no less. Then Melbourne. Love a good low BE as much as the next coach, but it still seems like a seduction to me (of the AFL Fantasy variety ).
View attachment 2018600
Has to for me unfortunately.Bonners going to survive in my team again isn't he?