The prelim
Yep, played a good game. Would need to watch it again but from memory played the intercept role more than the traditional CHB game? 7 of his 8 marks were uncontested
May be wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The prelim
Based on a conversation with a former player. That ok for you?
Whenever Jamie Elliot was guarded by Marchbank the general plan was for the other forwards to play high.
Now, I'm not stating whether it worked or it didn't - you sound like you have time to peruse every contest - I was, if you read my post, stating that was, from what i have been reliably told, the directive from the Collingwood's coaches at the time and it clearly says something about Marchy's vulnerability in a 1-on-1 scenario. Nothing I have seen from him in that situation refutes that - my opinion.
He gets a lot of goals kicked on him when required to defend and is unreliable playing the lockdown role - I think he gave away more free kicks against North than he had kicks? No doubt you will fact check me on that - so to the post that suggested when he's fit he's our 'best CHB' ...Yes, is a little bewildering.
He's a very good reader of the football and and a more than capable intercept defender. When he is fit, which is rarely, he does add to our overall defence.
So Marchbank is no good because Collingwood planned to kick a bunch of goals on him, even if they didn't and he racked up intercepts?
No need to fact check any more. He conceded some frees in his first game back. Doesn't mean he's no good, just that he needs to readjust to the level.
Agreed.Marchbank is a very good 3rd tall, but struggles with medium or tall forwards, which limits him and the side
I still believe he is better defensively than Kemp (at the moment) and Gov, but doesn't offer much more beyond certain matchups
Agreed.
I feel Marchbank can be a bit of a ball-stopper when we try to counterattack but he's ahead of Kemp when asked to play taller.
I still feel we'd ideally have a second genuine KPD in the lineup which frees up Kemp & Weiters (CHB) to play a more assertive role.
Have you seen another of someone or like someone enough you think who would fit the mould?
I find the MSD strange, there doesnt seem to be many success stories since its inception, but there has been heaps of players picked up in the ND or rookie drafts from the lower leagues, who have kicked on.
Didn’t Mannagh go second round to the Cats? Every club passed on him in the MSD.
There’s been a few key backs come from the State leagues so id be happy to grab one, or a Bailey Fritsch
No doubt but it's an area that I feel we've neglected to a degree, ideally, we'd bring in a ready-to-go option and have a draftee developing in the 2s to future-proof our D50.Easier said than done, but clearing the list of Young, Durdin and Marchbank to acquire a Sam Collins type would be better for our list and gameday structure
Then, 3rd tall defenders are more easily obtainable, one that is earmarked for Gov given his age
At his best, do you see a spot for Marchbank BB?
Personally, this week would have been a good game for him to be fit to play, on someone like Burgess
The Zurhaar matchup didn't suit him at all
I actually think we are short a midfielder because of the half forward injury issues /form and that's why our midfield is lacking this year.iF the midfield is dominating - the team can cope with a suspect defender. Carlton's midfield hasn't been anywhere near dominating - Olliw Hollands has been going in to ground ball contest instead of Docherty - massive change, at the same time Carroll is getting game time and he is learning on the job - an inside bull he isnt right now like O Holands gets shoved out of teh way and fumbles because of it.
Everything is linked to everything else. SOJH and Doch are huge outs, unfortunately.
YepI actually think we are short a midfielder because of the half forward injury issues /form and that's why our midfield is lacking this year.
I'd rather we move Kennedy back into the midfield and put Carroll at Half Forward (looks more dangerous there than the midfield). Walsh should provide some coverage on the opposition spread if they get the clearance
Outside of his first game this season, I have yet to see anything that's makes me think Carroll has the future to be in the midfield full time. I am seeing the same issues he had in VFL, it is just highlighted to larger extent in the AFL. He's a huge question mark for me
The counterpoint is that the club has forked out a significant amount of money over 7 years to play as an undersized KPD that it rarely available.Regardless of what I think about him it’s pretty clear how highly Marchbank is rated internally so much so that whenever he’s available he’s straight in, something that’s supported by the players in the way they talk about him.
Obviously his durability is a massive issue however I get the feeling whenever he’s cleared as fit to play he will be picked, and I’m totally fine with that. If anything we should consider his injury prone nature as a bonus in that we get his elite talent at a significant discount.
That description also fits Kemp tbf. He's weak 1 on 1 from what I've seen but can be a decent intercept. Ball in hand he worries me in the same way that Liam Jones did.Marchbank is an interceptor only....horrid one on one and an average baloony kick.. I'd stick with kemp
So Marchbank is no good because Collingwood planned to kick a bunch of goals on him, even if they didn't and he racked up intercepts?
No need to fact check any more. He conceded some frees in his first game back. Doesn't mean he's no good, just that he needs to readjust to the level.
gbatman are you Marchbank? or related to him? Such a mancrush.Marchbank to CHB, he's the best CHB on our list when fit. Wont take too long to get him match fit, 2-3 games. Kemp to a wing to play that 7th defender role that Acres often plays. Acres in a more forward running wing role. Kemp to rest in the forward line straight swap with Cottrell. Kemp goes forward When McKay goes into the ruck and Acres becomes that 7th defender while this is happening.
Kemp has the perfect profile for a wingman and could have forward qualities as well. He IMO is the perfect player to play that defensive winger/7th defender role. Particularly with his backline experience and experience as an intercepting/rebounding defender. IMO he could not be more perfect for this role. We would be crazy to not start trying him on a wing and sitting him in our D50
End of last season. He's been developed in the third tall role and missed a lot of footy. So only glimpses.Just an opinion but at what point has Marchbank ever looked like an elite CHB?
He can't play one-on-one, he's not agile enough to play slightly smaller - I know for a fact Collingwood, under Buckley, liked to expose him in defence by isolating the forward he was playing on. His career marks, spoils & intercept marks are considered by champion-data as either 'average' or 'below average'. Hardly what you want from your best CHB.
He's nice player, fits well in our system and has shown to be an important interceptor at times however the amount of flowers this guy gets from the fanbase is bewildering.
Weitering plays full backIt's Weitering then daylight, unfortunately, it's the same thing for FB.
Weitering plays Tom Snout.Weitering plays full back
Yep. he was drafted as a CHB & as I said, if played there, he'd be our best there tooWeitering plays full back
No current season stats available