Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
I love this. Hopefully he is an up front bloke when he has to confront the Boys Club of the AFL. Give more than he takes.
No, I was wondering about this myself. Sick, holidays ?Does anyone know why Duffield wasn't on SEN this morning? Seems to have disappeared off the broadcast schedule as well.
Good old Sutho proving funnelling enough corp sponsorship to your favourite sporting club is a great way to get a cushy job. Though I will say he's pretty good at building a business via mergers.
It’s a pity Gossage wouldn’t disappear from SEN instead of DuffDoes anyone know why Duffield wasn't on SEN this morning? Seems to have disappeared off the broadcast schedule as well.
Does anyone know why Duffield wasn't on SEN this morning? Seems to have disappeared off the broadcast schedule as well.
Him being waterboarded live?Duff has had some family illness recently, it’s why he disappeared last year. I hope it’s not that again and just a cold or flu.
I wouldn’t listen to Gossage under any circumstances
Good on JL for this.
I don't have any hard evidence, but my gut tells me there's a good chance both Darcy and Dogga kick more goals when the other is playing.Luke Hodge’s discussion of Darcy V Jackson on SEN is a tale of two halves. He shows the possessions when Jackson plays with Darcy vs the games without and shows the drop off when Darcy is in the team. This is a valid argument only slightly damaged by the sample size of both playing this season being so low.
However the analysis completely falls apart when he talks about scoreboard impact. He mentions score involvements stay the same which is true (5 with, 6 without).
However he says 4 goals for Jackson with Darcy and 4 for Jackson without Darcy. He completely forgets about averages for this part as he’s basically just shown that Jackson averages 1.3 goals a game with Darcy and 0.6 without Darcy. This is a big difference of 16 goals a year. I think it’s an honest mistake but it torpedoes his argument (that Jackson impacts the scoreboard the same with or without Darcy but plays much better as an individual without Darcy).
The actual analysis’s suggests Jackson can have more touches playing solo ruck but kicks more goals with Darcy in the team. At that point it’s a completely different argument to what Hodge is saying. Basically it’s now an argument of whether the Dockers are getting enough bang for buck when playing both as opposed to just keeping one or the other.
The thing that Hodge and Cornes don't mention is young ruckmen break down all the time. Jackson is only 22yrs old so is about 3yrs away from being able to hold down the solo ruck spot for an extended period.Luke Hodge’s discussion of Darcy V Jackson on SEN is a tale of two halves. He shows the possessions when Jackson plays with Darcy vs the games without and shows the drop off when Darcy is in the team. This is a valid argument only slightly damaged by the sample size of both playing this season being so low.
However the analysis completely falls apart when he talks about scoreboard impact. He mentions score involvements stay the same which is true (5 with, 6 without).
However he says 4 goals for Jackson with Darcy and 4 for Jackson without Darcy. He completely forgets about averages for this part as he’s basically just shown that Jackson averages 1.3 goals a game with Darcy and 0.6 without Darcy. This is a big difference of 16 goals a year. I think it’s an honest mistake but it torpedoes his argument (that Jackson impacts the scoreboard the same with or without Darcy but plays much better as an individual without Darcy).
The actual analysis’s suggests Jackson can have more touches playing solo ruck but kicks more goals with Darcy in the team. At that point it’s a completely different argument to what Hodge is saying. Basically it’s now an argument of whether the Dockers are getting enough bang for buck when playing both as opposed to just keeping one or the other.
Mine reckons Treacy kicks more goals when D&D are playing - and boy do we need them.I don't have any hard evidence, but my gut tells me there's a good chance both Darcy and Dogga kick more goals when the other is playing.
For the most part I agree, but when he says things like no night away games it means that we'll stop getting night home games here for the same reason.
I mean, the Grand Final is an afternoon game sooo...For the most part I agree, but when he says things like no night away games it means that we'll stop getting night home games here for the same reason.
Sat night is obviously the best timeslot at Optus so would be stupid to lose that
Youd be right re Treacy :Mine reckons Treacy kicks more goals when D&D are playing - and boy do we need them.
'bout time.Like how our club is getting a little noisy.
Peel works, travel is out of control.
Basics like not having a 6 day break is non negotiable.
Give us N extra home game AFL campaigners.