Mega Thread 2024 Media & Miscellaneous Thread

[FreoGirl]

they have already sold out of some sizes!

 

[Raz]

where is evidence of contact to his head?

someone saw it . He got reported

 

[nurries]

The old outcomes based suspension have gone down the shitter havent they?

Culley moved his arm first, Fyfe defended it.

 

[FreoGirl]

someone saw it . He got reported

shouldn't be enough when there's no video evidence

 

[Raz]

shouldn't be enough when there's no video evidence

That is for lawyers to argue

If there was no evidence he would have won appeal. .

 

[Raz]

shouldn't be enough when there's no video evidence

AFL Tribunal: Fyfe, Dockers lose despite ‘perfectly legitimate’ act; Rising Star fancy wins appeal

AFL Tribunal: Fyfe, Dockers lose despite ‘perfectly legitimate’ act; Rising Star fancy wins appeal

www.foxsports.com.au

 

[nurries]

AFL Tribunal: Fyfe, Dockers lose despite ‘perfectly legitimate’ act; Rising Star fancy wins appeal

AFL Tribunal: Fyfe, Dockers lose despite ‘perfectly legitimate’ act; Rising Star fancy wins appeal

www.foxsports.com.au

As i said, Culley acts first and is the agressor. Fyfe defended and got him high

If that was Cripps, he would be playing this week

 

[Raz]

As i said, Culley acts first and is the agressor. Fyfe defended and got him high

If that was Cripps, he would be playing this week

Freo lawyer sucks you think


And as all coaches teach their teams . It is the responder who normally gets charged

Fyfe hit him in head . Most likely accidental . The other guy just raised arm no hit

 

[FreoGirl]

Cripps takes a guy out for 3 weeks - play on

 

[Raz]

Cripps takes a guy out for 3 weeks - play on

Lawyers ! Can’t live without them

 

[FreoGirl]

Lawyers ! Can’t live without them

I wonder how serious our appeal was when Fyfe didn't even defend himself

 

[Raz]

I wonder how serious our appeal was when Fyfe didn't even defend himself

Umm cause he knew he was guilty

 

[FreoGirl]

Umm cause he knew he was guilty

or he thought it would be an easy and obvious case

 

[Raz]

or he thought it would be an easy and obvious case

Nope . He knows what he did .

He does it often during his career

 

[Nodgey]

The argument should be that the contact was insufficient force to warrant a report. Free kick, play on.

 

[Big Animal]

Umm cause he knew he was guilty

yeah, I wouldn't claim to know what another person is thinking.

 

[Raz]

The argument should be that the contact was insufficient force to warrant a report. Free kick, play on.

That again is upto lawyers .

Seems Freo got second rate lawyers perhaps

 

[Raz]

yeah, I wouldn't claim to know what another person is thinking.

Women know what mrn are thinking . Just ask wives lol

 

[Purpleheart_56]

That again is upto lawyers .

Seems Freo got second rate lawyers perhaps

I reckon U are right on that one...I don't recall they ever won any appeals for us...

 

[anchor man]

A wonderful response to the RAGS childish response to the Dockers banner.

 

[anchor man]

I reckon U are right on that one...I don't recall they ever won any appeals for us...

Wrong colours and wrong city.Have to be a Navy Blue and a have a silk that is a prominent one around town in Melbourne.

 

[Fred Ziffel]

Nope . He knows what he did .

He does it often during his career

It looked fairly innocuous. Seeing Nat has had surgery on both shoulders he seemed to be just fending off what appeared to be a deliberate bump at speed to his shoulder.
The reaction of the eagle player was also exaggerated.

 

[Raz]

It looked fairly innocuous. Seeing Nat has had surgery on both shoulders he seemed to be just fending off what appeared to be a deliberate bump at speed to his shoulder.
The reaction of the eagle player was also exaggerated.

Did you look at the video I linked to

There was no bump attempt . Fyfe is backing towards goals . The eagle player approaches and puts his arms up to presumably push Fyfe . Fyfe puts arms up and his tight hand hits the eagle in side off head

So no not protecting shoulders

 

[TimN2]

I wonder how serious our appeal was when Fyfe didn't even defend himself

I thought the Tribunal had moved to a model where they don't take any evidence from the players, on account of the players tending to give evidence that was not factual. Ranging from "No, your honour, he certainly didn't hit me. This? Oh, my jaw is just wired because ... I needed help managing my diet." to "He absolutely pinched me 400 times."

And the AFL is even more fixated that appeals only work out on legal technicalities, not anything a player might say about what they did or why, so any sign of Fyfe showing up probably would have counted against him.

 

[Raz]

I thought the Tribunal had moved to a model where they don't take any evidence from the players, on account of the players tending to give evidence that was not factual. Ranging from "No, your honour, he certainly didn't hit me. This? Oh, my jaw is just wired because ... I needed help managing my diet." to "He absolutely pinched me 400 times."

And the AFL is even more fixated that appeals only work out on legal technicalities, not anything a player might say about what they did or why, so any sign of Fyfe showing up probably would have counted against him.

Hire better lawyers Freo ! We a wealthy club !