threenewpadlocks
Brownlow Medallist
I don't see how those figures can be interpreted in any way other than exceptionally poor.
I'm also not entirely sure the relevancy of comparing to other standard Fox Sports 1 US NRL games (per the article). in a context where the matches start far later into the night.
We're talking about a 3 1/2 hour later start once you add in the two hours of daylight savings turnaround. There'll be few tens of thousands of people watching every prime time channel almost by default.
As the Guardian article points out a women's college basketball game between UNLV and Nevada (while a local derby, UNLV is barely top 25 ranked while Nevada is not ranked at all, women's college basketball is already small enough even among top 10 ranked teams) in the same timeslot got 68,000 the previous week. That suggests that fewer people watched NRL than whatever default cheapest American sport that they could put on at the time - filler women's college basketball. So it's costing FS1 viewers to broadcast it, and whatever people might tune in in America for the novelty is now seemingly outweighed by the people going "WTF is this" and switching channels.
I honestly don't see this venture lasting too many more years, if it's costing the NRL millions to stage every year. Which makes the sycophantic and one-sided Australian media coverage of it being a success and people quoting uncritical analysis of the NRL leadership discussing it as being worth millions as ridiculous. There's no guarantee that Fox Sports 1 in the US will even want to show it on their main channel next year, let alone the discussions of media and gambling rights deals being worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.
If there's a way to cut costs, or to continue to have similar sponsorship deals, cheaper stadium rents, rebates, and similar numbers of travelling fans etc., it doesn't necessarily have to cost millions or be a failure. It just was ridiculous to anyone with half a braincell or without carrying NRL pom-poms that it was going to somehow break through to the US sports market.
I'm also not entirely sure the relevancy of comparing to other standard Fox Sports 1 US NRL games (per the article). in a context where the matches start far later into the night.
“The audience of the first game was three times higher than the most watched NRL games on Fox Sports in the past three seasons and over 280 per cent higher than the most recent Saturday games on Fox Sports 1."
We're talking about a 3 1/2 hour later start once you add in the two hours of daylight savings turnaround. There'll be few tens of thousands of people watching every prime time channel almost by default.
As the Guardian article points out a women's college basketball game between UNLV and Nevada (while a local derby, UNLV is barely top 25 ranked while Nevada is not ranked at all, women's college basketball is already small enough even among top 10 ranked teams) in the same timeslot got 68,000 the previous week. That suggests that fewer people watched NRL than whatever default cheapest American sport that they could put on at the time - filler women's college basketball. So it's costing FS1 viewers to broadcast it, and whatever people might tune in in America for the novelty is now seemingly outweighed by the people going "WTF is this" and switching channels.
I honestly don't see this venture lasting too many more years, if it's costing the NRL millions to stage every year. Which makes the sycophantic and one-sided Australian media coverage of it being a success and people quoting uncritical analysis of the NRL leadership discussing it as being worth millions as ridiculous. There's no guarantee that Fox Sports 1 in the US will even want to show it on their main channel next year, let alone the discussions of media and gambling rights deals being worth tens or hundreds of millions of dollars.
If there's a way to cut costs, or to continue to have similar sponsorship deals, cheaper stadium rents, rebates, and similar numbers of travelling fans etc., it doesn't necessarily have to cost millions or be a failure. It just was ridiculous to anyone with half a braincell or without carrying NRL pom-poms that it was going to somehow break through to the US sports market.