Trades 2024 Round 2 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Billing was sub round zero ..
What's BE could be almost a side ways for Laz ...unsure on the numbers ..
Might need some biscuits to make it happen.
Billings' BE is 5 and his price starts moving up a week ahead of Lazzaro's, so a sideways can't happen unless I have the $60k to do it now unfortunately.

So need to find the biscuits and I think Zilliams is the only reasonable option.
 
Alright boys and girls, help a brother out? Early days, but 4 trade options below. As much as I would like to see Martin for another week, he's the obvious one in my team to trade to make money for Heeney (yes jumping on that wagon). Also throwing that Fish back in the ocean - he was a hard watch on the weekend!

The trades involving Martin also leave me with enough cash to go to Massimo next week if he plays well which is why I am leaning that way. Berry did nothing wrong, so seems a bit of a waste to trade him, but need that $$$.

What are your thoughts?

View attachment 1931621
View attachment 1931622
View attachment 1931624
View attachment 1931625
Not sure I like any of those trades but if you have to offload one of Martin or Berry, I'd get rid of Berry. You can still trade Martin the following week if need be.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Billings' BE is 5 and his price starts moving up a week ahead of Lazzaro's, so a sideways can't happen unless I have the $60k to do it now unfortunately.

So need to find the biscuits and I think Zilliams is the only reasonable option.

I was unsure on the numbers because he was the sub Rd zero.

I'll look to move Loz on when Mannugha on the bubble and not sub .
 
I think < Martin a hold this week .
AVG 88 last year with some lockouts and better DE ...should start fishing out 95s ..

I wish I went with Holmes watching his game from behide the ball was top notch .
I thought he was better than his SC score ..

But the players, spuds we picked are locked in till we trade their sorry arse's..
Let the door hit you on the way out ...and don't come back.
 
Not sure I like any of those trades but if you have to offload one of Martin or Berry, I'd get rid of Berry. You can still trade Martin the following week if need be.

I don't love any of them either, but the things you do to trade in a guy who is likely to burn me in the next few weeks!

The rest of my team is ok, scored 2,192 on the weekend.

Wines the only other to consider trading, but I like his role at Port.
 
Alright boys and girls, help a brother out? Early days, but 4 trade options below. As much as I would like to see Martin for another week, he's the obvious one in my team to trade to make money for Heeney (yes jumping on that wagon). Also throwing that Fish back in the ocean - he was a hard watch on the weekend!

The trades involving Martin also leave me with enough cash to go to Massimo next week if he plays well which is why I am leaning that way. Berry did nothing wrong, so seems a bit of a waste to trade him, but need that $$$.

What are your thoughts?

View attachment 1931621
View attachment 1931622
View attachment 1931624
View attachment 1931625
Sharp isn't on the bubble this week so can wait. No point getting him now, what if he gets injured before any price rises.

And you can't trade into Fyfe. He's one game closer to injury.
 
The trades involving Martin also leave me with enough cash to go to Massimo next week if he plays well which is why I am leaning that way. Berry did nothing wrong, so seems a bit of a waste to trade him, but need that $$$.
I just don't think its worth trading out Martin until we get another squiz.

Even elite players have the occasional down game for SC.

Heeney has looked amazing but he's also spent years being a total burn-man.

It would be the least surprising thing in the world if his scoring drops off again, particularly after Adams and Parker come back in a few weeks.

For me the real trade question is Rowell. But I can't pull the trigger on Martin without the evidence of another game.

Besides, Martin is a quality player. That's part of why we all picked him. Its just a question of DE and role.
 
Besides, Martin is a quality player. That's part of why we all picked him. Its just a question of DE and role.

Fisher on the other hand ...........
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Realistically, is there the possibility that Archie Perkins averages 95+ this year?

Seems to be the pick of the new brigade for on-ball, and had more CBAs than even Merrett.

Parish back hurts him, but no reason he can't be third in line there.
 
Realistically, is there the possibility that Archie Perkins averages 95+ this year?

Seems to be the pick of the new brigade for on-ball, and had more CBAs than even Merrett.

Parish back hurts him, but no reason he can't be third in line there.

I assume his role might be affected once Parish is back?
 
Realistically, is there the possibility that Archie Perkins averages 95+ this year?

Seems to be the pick of the new brigade for on-ball, and had more CBAs than even Merrett.

Parish back hurts him, but no reason he can't be third in line there.
will lose a lot of CBA when parish gets back. think they go with merrett fisher setterfield most of the time
 
Can somebody please explain why Jesse Hogan is not being talked about here

Heeney $483,000 averaging 140 break even -12
Billings $244,000 averaging 65 break even 5
Hogan $419,000 averaging 139 break even -46
Cadman $126,300 averaging 64 break even -56

Both the GWS boys have great JS and play Eagles in round 2
 
Can somebody please explain why Jesse Hogan is not being talked about here

Heeney $483,000 averaging 140 break even -12
Billings $244,000 averaging 65 break even 5
Hogan $419,000 averaging 139 break even -46
Cadman $126,300 averaging 64 break even -56

Both the GWS boys have great JS and play Eagles in round 2
thinking of trading clark fisher and gibcus for hogan cadman and dean

just unsure if bringing hogan in for 1 round and then flipping him after his price spike is worth it. not sure he continues to score well against decent teams

current team:

1710736481516.png
 
Gibcus > cheap rookie, no idea who yet.

Allowing Martin > Rowell before he is price goes bang.

A bit sideways with Martin being hooked but sometimes just have to pull the trigger. Looking at their BEs as well.

Thoughts?
 
thinking of trading clark fisher and gibcus for hogan cadman and dean

just unsure if bringing hogan in for 1 round and then flipping him after his price spike is worth it. not sure he continues to score well against decent teams

current team:

View attachment 1931721
GWS have a great team and are well coached with a good game plan now
Himmelberg is a backman and Riccardi gets used up the ground leaving Cadman & Hogan foward

Hogans price should go up for the next 3-4 weeks specially with playing the eagles next week and could get to $600k+ whilst scoring well.

For me is between Hogan / Cadman on which player i decide
Hogan costs more but can score big whilst making $$$
Cadman is cheaper and will make $200k and both have good JS with no challengers for their positions
 
just on billings, and nothing against him he is a good footballer

he's more of a downhill skier , and he aint getting 20 odd uncontested marks each week either which severely bumped his score up

he's a 60-70 ave imo
Played the Dogs who are a pretty good team. Should be good for 80+ based on previous scoring history.
 
Can somebody please explain why Jesse Hogan is not being talked about here

Heeney $483,000 averaging 140 break even -12
Billings $244,000 averaging 65 break even 5
Hogan $419,000 averaging 139 break even -46
Cadman $126,300 averaging 64 break even -56

Both the GWS boys have great JS and play Eagles in round 2
The bye structure having Flanders Green and Sexton hurts him you really can’t have 4 players out in one bye round
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top