Game Day 2024 Round 22 Swans v. Collingwood 9th August 7:40 PM @ SCG

[Bloods86]

Campbell must have put in one hell of a training session to have both redeemed himself for being dropped AND overtaken two players who actually earned recalls via games.

Who earned recalls via games last week?

 

[Bloods86]

Cleary the sub.

God that is shit house.

Yeah, so not even 4 real changes.

 

[The King!]

Had nothing to lose throwing Cleary in to start and then worse case make the change to Campbell

 

[caesar88]

Who earned recalls via games last week?

Not last week, but Cleary and Warner Jr. earned senior promotions with their form in the VFL games.

Campbell's last game earned him a dropping.

 

[grimlock]

Weather update?

The worst of it looks to be passing to the north of the SCG. I think it will hit before the game starts but should pass by the end of the first.

#notaweatherman

 

[Jeffers]

Reckon the downpour will happen just before or on the bounce but won’t be long.

 

[RUNVS]

Had nothing to lose throwing Cleary in to start and then worse case make the change to Campbell

Longmire is massively risk adverse, always has been.

 

[Bloods86]

Not last week, but Cleary and Warner Jr. earned senior promotions with their form in the VFL games.

Campbell's last game earned him a dropping.

I don't think he should have been dropped in the first place. The issue I see is Corey out and Cleary only as sub, instead of some of the guys responsible for last week.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Cleary the sub.

God that is shit house.

Was him or Campbell like it matters

 

[grimlock]

I reckon Mills plays back tonight and Parker predominantly in the middle with either Chad or Heeney spending more time forward.

 

[SSwans2011]

Yeah bit miffed Campbell gets a full game while Cleary is sub.

He's had plenty of chances this year and had bugger all impact. Not even sure why he's back at all, much like Wicks a few weeks ago, we dropped them for a reason, just to bring them back without them doing anything to necessitate that.

And in the case of Wicks, he was at least important to our success earlier in the season. I wouldn't personally say the same about Campbell.

i really hope he proves me wrong and hopefully at least they give him a role where he's able to be more noticeable out there than he usually is.

 

[The King!]

Sydney lose by 112 and into the 22

In Rampe Amartey back from injury , Campbell (from no chance to prove himself since dropped) Parker (last weeks sub)

Out Francis Ladhams (fill ins for injured players) Wicks , Warner (subbed out last week)

So from the full game we realised Wicks needed to be Campbell and Parker should start

Not saying right or wrong just interesting

 

[grimlock]

Longmire is massively risk adverse, always has been.

Reid in 22GF and Mills in 16GF says otherwise

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Had nothing to lose throwing Cleary in to start and then worse case make the change to Campbell

Except the game right. We have picked the best side to win the game right now and boy I am hardly a Campbell fan too much

 

[The King!]

Longmire is massively risk adverse, always has been.

The whole side was last week

 

[Day_night_honourer]

Cleary the sub.

God that is shit house.

Thank F it's not Parker though!

 

[caesar88]

I don't think he should have been dropped in the first place. The issue I see is Corey out and Cleary only as sub, instead of some of the guys responsible for last week.

Whether he should've been or not, he was dropped and hasn't played a game since yet somehow finds his way back into the starting 22. That's a joke.

You also have to feel sorry for Cleary, who, if we avoid injuries tonight, will have to wait until his fourth AFL game just to play his fourth quarter of footy. Absolute joke.

 

[TheGoatBaron]

Thank god the K-League is on tonight if things go pear shaped quickly

 

[The King!]

Except the game right. We have picked the best side to win the game right now and boy I am hardly a Campbell fan too much

Have we ? maybe , I know what Campbell will do tonight

12 -15 touches and maybe 3 marks because he won't play in the middle anyway.

Then we will forget he is there until he turns it over, a lot of that is on the coaches .

If Campbell gets 20 possies tonight I won't post here for a fortnight

 

[Mister B]

That was the only positive with knowing the result so early last Saturday. You could relax and just watch for good passages of play, players doing the right thing, instead of stressing.

At least in theory you could look for that stuff.

Save the blood pressure, destroy the kidneys.

 

[LukeParkerno1]

Have we ? maybe , I know what Campbell will do tonight

12 -15 touches and maybe 3 marks because he won't play in the middle anyway.

Then we will forget he is there until he turns it over, a lot of that is on the coaches .

If Campbell gets 20 possies tonight I won't post here for a fortnight

Would have played Sheldrick over both personally

 

[Bloods86]

Whether he should've been or not, he was dropped and hasn't played a game since yet somehow finds his way back into the starting 22. That's a joke.

You also have to feel sorry for Cleary, who, if we avoid injuries tonight, will have to wait until his fourth AFL game just to play his fourth quarter of footy. Absolute joke.

Oh I wanted Cleary in for a full game.

Out of the 23 we named I'd have gone Parker or Florent as sub.

 

[Kbroome]

Campbell to have 15 touches 3 marks 3 tackles and a shot on goal and thats about all is my prediction. Won't be a game breaker if we win or loose

 

[The King!]

Would have played Sheldrick over both personally

Tonight is about Heeney Warner Gulden Grundy Parker etc etc anyway , so this part is almost irrelevant.


Let's see what happens , but Campbell - damn at least play him in the middle then

 

[Jeffers]

Let’s hope the boys have appropriate footwear tonight when it gets dewy. I’ll lose my shit if we keep slipping over