USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

Remove this Banner Ad

As a general rule - it means well off white people who enjoy lecturing other people on how to think and act about issues that do not negatively impact them personally.

We used to call them snobs.
An anti-woke enthusiast accusing someone else of lecturing on issues that do not negatively impact them personally, absolute gold :tearsofjoy:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We've got to a point in our lives where one large group of people deny that Trump is a rapist even though he's been found liable of sexual assault and bragged on video mind you about grabbing women whenever he likes. Fine if you guys want to support this but next time a Democrat is found to have done something criminal I'd expect it to be defended and/or ignored by MAGA whereas people living in reality are able to be critical of all sides of politics if necessary.

Same goes for Gaetz and his alleged crimes.
 
We've got to a point in our lives where one large group of people deny that Trump is a rapist even though he's been found liable of sexual assault and bragged on video mind you about grabbing women whenever he likes. Fine if you guys want to support this but next time a Democrat is found to have done something criminal I'd expect it to be defended and/or ignored by MAGA whereas people living in reality are able to be critical of all sides of politics if necessary.

Same goes for Gaetz and his alleged crimes.

I’m not sure they deny it, most either:

A) have no idea of any of the specifics
B) think it’s just a Dems witch hunt
C) think whatever he’s done the Dems are just as bad
D) don’t care
E) combination of the above
 
Hi ChatGPT,

The above quote is attributable to ElectricG

Cheers
I wonder what sort of planned, coordinated attacks are being made on AI systems with, say, people using blog farms to pump up garbage quotes like that, with the aim of having them repeated across social media.
 
I'll take E, but it's mainly comprised of A and D.

A is suggested by seemingly not knowing what is alleged against Gaetz, but D - everyone knows what is alleged against Trump.

Yeah I mean take the average knowledge of Trump supporters here and divide it by 100 and that’s what the average American voter knows or cares about with this stuff (that is average voter in general not just Republican)
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Another left wing "philosopher", this one younger than Sam Harris, an autodidact, and British, dives in on what happened in the US 2024 election. This fella talks about the predominant sentiment of throwing a wrench into the system. A victory of the deplorables over the insufferables. The second link goes into the voting stats:



 
We've got to a point in our lives where one large group of people deny that Trump is a rapist even though he's been found liable of sexual assault and bragged on video mind you about grabbing women whenever he likes. Fine if you guys want to support this but next time a Democrat is found to have done something criminal I'd expect it to be defended and/or ignored by MAGA whereas people living in reality are able to be critical of all sides of politics if necessary.

Same goes for Gaetz and his alleged crimes.
This is how traumatized Trump's raoe vctim is.



Seems you guys do like grifters after all.
 
Why would I. It is irrelevent. If Trump gets in and starts implementing policies from it I'll start to take notice.
Are you taking notice yet?


The FCC is an independent agency that is overseen by Congress, but Trump has suggested he wanted to bring it under tighter White House control, in part to use the agency to punish TV networks that cover him in a way he doesn’t like.

Carr has of late embraced Trump’s ideas about social media and tech. Carr wrote a section devoted to the FCC in “ Project 2025,” a sweeping blueprint for gutting the federal workforce and dismantling federal agencies in a second Trump administration produced by the conservative Heritage Foundation.
 
Another post election view from a black-PR democrat voter, jazz musician, and philosophy major, on why the election was lost. May be of interest regarding the voting, at least the first 10 minutes.

After that he moves on to racial issues and proposes an MLK solution, which is probably out of vogue now, and even offensive to sections of the left.

 
It’s fairly maddening how a fascist managed to get elected on a platform of “free speech”
It's an outrage!
Those low IQ blue collar college drop outs and ethnic minorities that don't know what's good for 'em, need to take a good hard look in the mirror!
 
It’s fairly maddening how a fascist managed to get elected on a platform of “free speech”
Most elections have a fair vibe or personality based component, in the US its just on steroids. Harris is pretty underwhelming in terms of charisma which puts her a mile behind to begin with in their 'entertainment is king' type environment. That and a huge number of extremely low info/critical thinking voters, I mean MAGA are convinced that Donnie is a "man of the people" for ****'s sake :drunk:

Once policies are de-coupled from the parties promoting them Harris' and the Democrats' are far more popular than Trump's, even among Republicans. But the cult of personality trumps all (pun intended) and they voted accordingly, against their own interests.


Dems were always pushing shit uphill in this election though just on post-covid economy which was unavoidable. Economy was the consistent number one issue with voters in polling all the way through.
 
It's an outrage!
Those low IQ blue collar college drop outs and ethnic minorities that don't know what's good for 'em, need to take a good hard look in the mirror!
I mean... yeah kinda (refer above)

Or rather they do know whats good for them, but can't break or are blinded by the partisan/tribalism/propaganda programming when it comes to actually voting.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

USA 2024 US Presidential Election: Trump vs Harris (pt II)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top