losing ldu effectively resets their rebuild timer back to square one. seen this one before a few times, its practically in syndication.
shrewd, very shrewd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
U23s
December 1st 2025
Ages in brackets
Sharp & Rodriguez in 2025 draft
B: Smith (21) Blight (23) Trainor (19)
HB: Rodriguez (18) Gibcus (22) Brown (22)
C: Campbell (20) Sharp (18) Banks (22)
HF: Hotton (19) Faull (19) Clarke (22)
F: Lalor (19) Armstrong (19) Alger (18)
Foll: Sims (19) Smillie (19) McAuliffe (20)
Int: (from) Green (21) Sonsie (22) MRJ (23) Tresize (23) Gray (22) Fawcett (20) Bauer (23)
Obviously some won’t make it and this team will have some experience scattered through it. But the foundations are there. Just need to get a ruck via FA
20s gonna be more like a 30 nothing pick after all the bids, talent will be picked clean.It’s not Matt Whitlock, Pick 3 and 20 something for pick 2 though, it’s for pick 2 and LDU.
20s gonna be more like a 30 nothing pick after all the bids, talent will be picked clean.
Picture of when FOS wanted to play footy with all his mates and they were choosing teams:
View attachment 2176064
This gag doesn’t work
You don’t pick the teams you want to play for
Secondly he’s better than pfieffer on a like for like
Thirdly you’d take FOS even when norf have to trade him to us
Pretty disappointing effort if im honest with you
You post like I care what you think.
Well you replied so you clearly do
TBH I get confused with you and milk boi. Apparently he has a sense of humour
Probably not ideal if a KPF becomes pick 1. I'd be shocked if we took a ruck but 12 months ago I'd have been shocked if we traded all our best players out at once.There could be some absolute unicorns in the next draft even though it's compromised. Sharp might even go outside top 3 at this point.
CDT, Ludowkye, Emmett and Rodriguez all pushing for pick 1.
Good thing we have 2 chances at pick 1 with North's future first.
3 list changes. Can be promoted rookie but we also have a F/S. Once he gets to pick 37 it's just match with our next pick (I.e. 5th rounder)Question
Does the AFL still have that rule where all clubs need to draft 3 kids a season?
How many picks do we have? I'm sure we traded out our 2nd, 3rd & 4th rounders already? Blair's interview yesterday he mentioned the compromised draft so didnt seem keen on making any late picks hence why we were happy to trade Alger in.
I think you have to make 3 list changes but you can get by with only drafting 2 in the national draft then promoting a rookie/s. We might have a father son we can draft or add to the list late in Kellaway to get to 3 if we have to anywayQuestion
Does the AFL still have that rule where all clubs need to draft 3 kids a season?
How many picks do we have? I'm sure we traded out our 2nd, 3rd & 4th rounders already? Blair's interview yesterday he mentioned the compromised draft so didnt seem keen on making any late picks hence why we were happy to trade Alger in.
Problem is for Pies they won't have any currency outside Softcos and his brother. De Goey and Moore will be 29.I reckon our strategy this year is going to attempt to be replicated by other teams in the coming years. The one year rebuild where you trade out a bunch, invest heavily in the draft then let your natural shitness for the next couple of years get you the remaining picks you need to complete the list build.
It's actually pretty genius (if it works) because it sets expectations at zero for a couple of years and it hurts other teams like this year where we have taken the bulk of the talls so others have to get the scraps. Pies will be next to do it for sure, the cliff is right there and I reckon Fly ****s off if they are bottom 4. He's won a flag, he might as well ride that achievement and take the next job available rather than stay for the rebuild.
Problem is for Pies they won't have any currency outside Softcos and his brother. De Goey and Moore will be 29.
They can't trade spuds like Schulz because they can't trade with themselves.
Also, we lucked out big time with the strength of this draft.
If we finish last, I actually think that is the best-case scenario if there's a standout tall at Pick 1.Probably not ideal if a KPF becomes pick 1. I'd be shocked if we took a ruck but 12 months ago I'd have been shocked if we traded all our best players out at once.
What won't shock me is Rodriguez passing Sharp.
Despite drafting a range of tall's we didn’t recruit a pure ruckman and will still need a genuine Nankervis replacement. If Emmett or CDT prove to be out and out ruckmen rather than forwards they could fill a genuine need.Probably not ideal if a KPF becomes pick 1. I'd be shocked if we took a ruck but 12 months ago I'd have been shocked if we traded all our best players out at once.
What won't shock me is Rodriguez passing Sharp.
If we finish last, I actually think that is the best-case scenario if there's a standout tall at Pick 1.
By then we'll have a good read on the talls we've taken already and if we don't think there's a couple of 200 game players there then we take the tall at Pick 1. If we're already confident with the ones we have on our list, then we'll have clubs falling over themselves to trade up to get him and could end up with a bunch of picks for us to take a number of mids.