fr tho when was the last time a big name player has gone to a proper crap side?No A-grader wants to spend their entire career in the bottom 4 just for a slightly fatter wallet.
WC officially out of the running confirmed
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fr tho when was the last time a big name player has gone to a proper crap side?No A-grader wants to spend their entire career in the bottom 4 just for a slightly fatter wallet.
WC officially out of the running confirmed
JammoMonty to confirm the "big name" credentials of that.Logue says hello.
The Saints did get a washed up Dan Hannebery and FIGJAM Liam Henry onto their list.JammoMonty to confirm the "big name" credentials of that.
So between them, North and Saints have:
Logue
B.Crouch
Polec
The big Vic clubs have:
All the good players
This is the way. When the cap squeeze comes, we need to get in the ear of our fringe player managers to target opportunity at the minows to shake loose some decent Capital. We can then trade it for cap space.The Saints did get a washed up Dan Hannebery and FIGJAM Liam Henry onto their list.
Tbf though those two probably just show they were desperate.
Brad Hill not so much but the money (by reports) and trade price (Serong lol) was a bit much.
The Saints did get a washed up Dan Hannebery and FIGJAM Liam Henry onto their list.
Tbf though those two probably just show they were desperate.
Brad Hill not so much but the money (by reports) and trade price (Serong lol) was a bit much.
Has a player ever said they left for cash? Scully?
and if my grandmother had wheels she would have been a bicycleThis. Noddy is our Chad.
Dudley can play will be interesting to see how he goes at afl training levelAdelaide didn't take him through their academy ?
20 goals in 21 games.
Should have winder training with us.
Has a player ever said they left for cash? Scully?
With there being 4 big clubs plus Geelong for the surfers and Hawthorn with 20% of the last 50 AFL Premierships there is bound to be one of them offering close enough to the money offered by the Dogs/Saints/North/Melb to justify taking a bit less for a greater chance of success / post career opportunity for each individual player (depending on their respective needs at the time).JammoMonty to confirm the "big name" credentials of that.
So between them, North and Saints have:
Logue
B.Crouch
Polec
The big Vic clubs have:
All the good players
I'd rather he wins a gold medal in the 100m & 200m at the Olympics for Australia.Any chance of getting Gout Gout onto the list as an Academy pick.. would go pretty well on the wing
Who are the big 4 these days:With there being 4 big clubs plus Geelong for the surfers and Hawthorn with 20% of the last 50 AFL Premierships there is bound to be one of them offering close enough to the money offered by the Dogs/Saints/North/Melb to justify taking a bit less for a greater chance of success / post career opportunity for each individual player (depending on their respective needs at the time).
With us and the SA clubs it's a bit different obviously.
No doubt. I think a bit less is fine.With there being 4 big clubs plus Geelong for the surfers and Hawthorn with 20% of the last 50 AFL Premierships there is bound to be one of them offering close enough to the money offered by the Dogs/Saints/North/Melb to justify taking a bit less for a greater chance of success / post career opportunity for each individual player (depending on their respective needs at the time).
With us and the SA clubs it's a bit different obviously.
Hawthorn and Geelong have more members than Essendon. The bombers are definitely not big in the sense Collingwood are big
I think they all fudge, north are the worst, anyone that believes that rabble has 50k is deludedAren’t the Hawks famous for counting pet memberships? Or am I confusing them for another club?
What I always find pathetic is those clubs only ever get above 25,000 in the ground against Victorian sides.I think they all fudge, north are the worst, anyone that believes that rabble has 50k is deluded
I think they all fudge, north are the worst, anyone that believes that rabble has 50k is deluded
i give kudos to the bombers fans though, theyre a lot more loyal than some of the other vic clubs, especially the hawkHawthorn and Geelong have more members than Essendon. The bombers are definitely not big in the sense Collingwood are big
thought that included the Tassie folk who went to watch their odd games down there.I think they all fudge, north are the worst, anyone that believes that rabble has 50k is deluded
Been that 4 for a long time. Dons have been poor for so long now that the damage will be permanent if the don't get back in GF contention this cycle. There are now people who were born since they have won a final who have children themselves. If they're still not winning when the next generation hit the period when allegiances start to solidify (say 6/7/8 years old), they'll never get them back.Who are the big 4 these days:
Essendon, Carlton, Collingwood, Richmond?
I reckon players are going to give up on Essendon soon.....if they haven't already. For some reason the Bulldogs always manage to get good players in the door.
Is it a headcount?thought that included the Tassie folk who went to watch their odd games down there.