20th AFL Team

Which location will be the home of the 20th AFL team?


  • Total voters
    431

Remove this Banner Ad

Population growth is overrated. For example, most of Melbourne’s growth is from Asia. There are half a million people of Chinese background in Melbourne. And nearly as many Indians, Does this really help the viability of AFL clubs?
Good point. Unless they start getting into footy, it won’t help grow the game.
 
It wouldn’t make sense to have three teams on SEQ and only two in Perth.

If they want more games in the new stadium from 2033, the logical step is for the Suns to play two games there, rather than in Darwin.

If it's for Team 20, WA3 does make more sense than SEQ3. But if WA3 misses out, SEQ3 might edge ahead if there's ever another expansion round.

Both SEQ and Perth have similar population growth, so that's not a factor.

But currently, SEQ has about 1.5m more people than Perth. SEQ has the population of Perth and Adelaide combined.

SEQ also has more defined regions than Perth.

At this stage the assumption for WA3 is another team Perth team, likely based in Joondalup. Joondalup is only 25km from Optus, it doesn't offer much other than "another team".

Whereas Brisbane only has the one team. It has room for a Brisbane derby. Or the Sunshine Coast will be big enough for a team in a few decades.

So I don't think SEQ3 makes more sense than WA3 now, but that won't always be the case. Especially if footy continues to make gains in SEQ.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

If it's for Team 20, WA3 does make more sense than SEQ3. But if WA3 misses out, SEQ3 might edge ahead if there's ever another expansion round.

Both SEQ and Perth have similar population growth, so that's not a factor.

But currently, SEQ has about 1.5m more people than Perth. SEQ has the population of Perth and Adelaide combined.

SEQ also has more defined regions than Perth.

At this stage the assumption for WA3 is another team Perth team, likely based in Joondalup. Joondalup is only 25km from Optus, it doesn't offer much other than "another team".

Whereas Brisbane only has the one team. It has room for a Brisbane derby. Or the Sunshine Coast will be big enough for a team in a few decades.

So I don't think SEQ3 makes more sense than WA3 now, but that won't always be the case. Especially if footy continues to make gains in SEQ.
There will always be more footy fans in Perth than SEQ, where the vast majority of people prefer NRL. And the Sunshine Coast is a bunch of towns and villages. If they can’t sustain an NRL team (there is no talk of that), there is no chance of an AFL team.
 
Population growth is overrated. For example, most of Melbourne’s growth is from Asia. There are half a million people of Chinese background in Melbourne. And nearly as many Indians, Does this really help the viability of AFL clubs?
Yes, but its longer term. Its the 2nd and 3rd generations the AFL targets.
 
There will always be more footy fans in Perth than SEQ, where the vast majority of people prefer NRL. And the Sunshine Coast is a bunch of towns and villages. If they can’t sustain an NRL team (there is no talk of that), there is no chance of an AFL team.
There actually has been talk of an NRL team on the Sunshine Coast, it's just way down the list.

You could put an NRL team on the Sunshine Coast, but why would you when you could put one in Ipswich or south of the river in Brisbane, not to mention Perth, NZ, Adelaide, etc.
 
There will always be more footy fans in Perth than SEQ,

That might be considered less incentive to put in a team.

where the vast majority of people prefer NRL. And the Sunshine Coast is a bunch of towns and villages.

Reiterating that I'm talking well down the track. If Team 20 comes in after 2030, there's a good chance that the 21/22 expansion wouldn't happen for another 25-30 years.

By which point the Sunshine Coast (plus Noosa) will have nearly 700k people. Those towns and villages will have infilled and become suburbs.

And the northern suburbs of Brisbane will be encroaching and could be included in the catchment (the Moreton Bay region will be pushing 1m).

If they can’t sustain an NRL team (there is no talk of that), there is no chance of an AFL team.

As Badger said, the NRL have bigger fish to fry.

Given the southern influx expected to fuel the growth, the Sunshine Coast could be quite AFL-friendly.

And imagine the scenes when the AFL is the first to plant the flag in Queensland's third largest city. Could give them a massive headstart.
 
That might be considered less incentive to put in a team.



Reiterating that I'm talking well down the track. If Team 20 comes in after 2030, there's a good chance that the 21/22 expansion wouldn't happen for another 25-30 years.

By which point the Sunshine Coast (plus Noosa) will have nearly 700k people. Those towns and villages will have infilled and become suburbs.

And the northern suburbs of Brisbane will be encroaching and could be included in the catchment (the Moreton Bay region will be pushing 1m).



As Badger said, the NRL have bigger fish to fry.

Given the southern influx expected to fuel the growth, the Sunshine Coast could be quite AFL-friendly.

And imagine the scenes when the AFL is the first to plant the flag in Queensland's third largest city. Could give them a massive headstart.
But like you said, Brisbane is a one team city with room for another in the future.

A 2nd Brisbane side could always play a home game on the Sunny Coast to incorporate them.

I still think Auckland and Newcastle would have more to offer if they ever expand to 22 teams as they’re new markets but if the AFL were cautious about the risk then Brisbane 2 and Perth 3 would make more sense.
 
But like you said, Brisbane is a one team city with room for another in the future.

A 2nd Brisbane side could always play a home game on the Sunny Coast to incorporate them.

I still think Auckland and Newcastle would have more to offer if they ever expand to 22 teams as they’re new markets but if the AFL were cautious about the risk then Brisbane 2 and Perth 3 would make more sense.

I think for the afl, once they have good and solid representation in nsw and qld and are closer to matching the nrl there (let's say 75 percent the size), only then would they look overseas to a place like Auckland.

Currently nsw and qld make up 25 percent of participants in Australia, which is better than I thought, so they are half way to matching their population, of around 50 percent of Australia.
 
I think for the afl, once they have good and solid representation in nsw and qld and are closer to matching the nrl there (let's say 75 percent the size), only then would they look overseas to a place like Auckland.

Currently nsw and qld make up 25 percent of participants in Australia, which is better than I thought, so they are half way to matching their population, of around 50 percent of Australia.
Yeah, I think you’re right.

I would be looking to Brisbane 2 and Perth 3 after Canberra. I really don’t think these two expansion options would fail. Perth already underrepresented and Brisbane eventually will be, so it makes sense.

Auckland and Newcastle maybe after that, and then Darwin and Cairns but not in our lifetimes and possibly never because of the climate and small population growth.
 
That might be considered less incentive to put in a team.



Reiterating that I'm talking well down the track. If Team 20 comes in after 2030, there's a good chance that the 21/22 expansion wouldn't happen for another 25-30 years.

By which point the Sunshine Coast (plus Noosa) will have nearly 700k people. Those towns and villages will have infilled and become suburbs.

And the northern suburbs of Brisbane will be encroaching and could be included in the catchment (the Moreton Bay region will be pushing 1m).



As Badger said, the NRL have bigger fish to fry.

Given the southern influx expected to fuel the growth, the Sunshine Coast could be quite AFL-friendly.

And imagine the scenes when the AFL is the first to plant the flag in Queensland's third largest city. Could give them a massive headstart.
Hopefully I don't come off too pedantic, but the Sunshine Coast is a region, not a city, and I'm not sure exactly how Queensland defines it's cities, but I highly doubt that the towns on the Sunshine Coast like Noosa, Caloundra, Maroochydore, etc, will ever grow bigger than some of the cities that boarder Brisbane like Ipswich, Logan, or on the Gold Coast.

The AFL won't beat the NRL to the Sunshine Coast either, at least not unless they pull the tigger way too early. There's been a Qld Cup (2nd tier state league) team on the Sunshine Coast on and off since the mid 90s and continuously since 09 (IIRC), and NRL matches and events have been played there semi-regularly for the better part of a decade now. The Dolphins are meant to play at least 1 or 2 games there a season from now on as well, but we'll see if that lasts.

Both the NRL and AFL are quickly reaching the point where demand for licenses outstrips supply. Once that happens both will be forced to restructure their competitions to allow for further growth (conferences, pyramid, etc), and once they do expansion will happen in larger blocks for broadcasting, draw, and equalisation reasons. Just like if/when the NFL expands it'll have to jump from 32 teams to 40 in quick succession if it's to maintain even conferences and a fair draw and travel schedule.

Once that happens the Sunshine Coast will be one of the first cabs off the ranks in the NRL, and, for multiple reasons, that development is likely to happen in the NRL quicker than the AFL, though it's still a fair way away in either case.
 
Hopefully I don't come off too pedantic, but the Sunshine Coast is a region, not a city, and I'm not sure exactly how Queensland defines it's cities, but I highly doubt that the towns on the Sunshine Coast like Noosa, Caloundra, Maroochydore, etc, will ever grow bigger than some of the cities that boarder Brisbane like Ipswich, Logan, or on the Gold Coast.

Isn't that just what the Gold Coast was? They only decided to make Southport the CBD a decade ago.

Maroochydore and Caloundra are both already a part of one contiguous stretch of suburbia. And at the southern end of that they're building a 50k-person development.

Still won't rival Brisbane or Gold Coast for population, but will have enough people to sustain a team.

The AFL won't beat the NRL to the Sunshine Coast either, at least not unless they pull the tigger way too early. There's been a Qld Cup (2nd tier state league) team on the Sunshine Coast on and off since the mid 90s and continuously since 09 (IIRC), and NRL matches and events have been played there semi-regularly for the better part of a decade now. The Dolphins are meant to play at least 1 or 2 games there a season from now on as well, but we'll see if that lasts.

But what number would the Sunshine Coast be for the NRL? I assume at least Perth, NZ2, PNG, Bris3, Adelaide, and maybe Melb2 would come first.

I really can't tell with the NRL because they seem to expand so sporadically, but I would assume the AFL expands to 22 teams before the NRL expands to 24.

I think the NFL is a different comparison when owners are throwing billions to get in. I still think expansion in Australian leagues will have to be more measured, especially after the current more lucrative options for the NRL have been tapped.
 
Isn't that just what the Gold Coast was? They only decided to make Southport the CBD a decade ago.

Maroochydore and Caloundra are both already a part of one contiguous stretch of suburbia. And at the southern end of that they're building a 50k-person development.

Still won't rival Brisbane or Gold Coast for population, but will have enough people to sustain a team.



But what number would the Sunshine Coast be for the NRL? I assume at least Perth, NZ2, PNG, Bris3, Adelaide, and maybe Melb2 would come first.

I really can't tell with the NRL because they seem to expand so sporadically, but I would assume the AFL expands to 22 teams before the NRL expands to 24.

I think the NFL is a different comparison when owners are throwing billions to get in. I still think expansion in Australian leagues will have to be more measured, especially after the current more lucrative options for the NRL have been tapped.
But it won’t have enough people to sustain an AFL team. The vast majority of residents prefer NRL. Even with 500k residents in 2040/50 it will still be a much smaller AFL market than Hobart.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Isn't that just what the Gold Coast was? They only decided to make Southport the CBD a decade ago.

Maroochydore and Caloundra are both already a part of one contiguous stretch of suburbia. And at the southern end of that they're building a 50k-person development.

Still won't rival Brisbane or Gold Coast for population, but will have enough people to sustain a team.
Sure, they could turn the Sunshine Coast into a metropolitan area like the Gold Coast, but it'd still be smaller than Ipswich/Western Brisbane, Logan/Southern Brisbane, Moreton Bay/Northern Brisbane, etc, in real terms.
But what number would the Sunshine Coast be for the NRL? I assume at least Perth, NZ2, PNG, Bris3, Adelaide, and maybe Melb2 would come first.

I really can't tell with the NRL because they seem to expand so sporadically, but I would assume the AFL expands to 22 teams before the NRL expands to 24.

I think the NFL is a different comparison when owners are throwing billions to get in. I still think expansion in Australian leagues will have to be more measured, especially after the current more lucrative options for the NRL have been tapped.
The NRL is already in a similar place to the NFL, where for the last 15-20 years there's been roughly half a dozen viable bids trying to force their way into the league at any one time. They've also openly discussed moving to a system of two conferences of 10 once they hit 20 teams (Sydney + Newcastle and everybody else), which almost certainly won't happen for internal political and competition balancing reasons, but 4 conferences of 5 is a realistic shout.

They're also actively in the process of trying to squeeze Perth, two NZ bids, another Brisbane team (likely Ipswich), and the Bears into two licenses, and that's before we talk about other ideas and former bids that would/could be viable like Adelaide, the Central Coast, and many others including the Sunshine Coast.

It's also much cheaper and less risky to start up and maintain an NRL club than an AFL club. It wouldn't be ideal by any means, but at this point an NRL side can basically survive off the yearly grant if it's forced to. They also have a larger and more diverse global talent pool to draw from than the AFL, especially if we acknowledge poaching from RU.
All of which means they have the ability to expand much more quickly, to markets with a much smaller base, and they don't have to worry about diluting the quality of the product on the pitch as much as the AFL.

Which brings us to what number the Sunshine Coast would be, well it depends. Partly on the NRL's totally unpredictable whims, and, by extension, how quickly they pull the trigger on a conference system.

Setting aside the NRL's unpredictability, if they do end up committing to a 4 conference system after team 20 (i.e. by the end of the decade), the next time they expand after that they'll need to expand by 4, and the time after that it'd likely be a quick jump by 8 to 32.

That could all happen by sometime about 2050 if the NRL really wanted it to (FTR, I'm not necessarily saying it should), and the Sunshine Coast would very much be in those discussions. Alternatively, they could not go to conferences and expand more slowly, or, being the NRL, they could decide to flaff about for another couple decades, or have another self-inflicted cataclysmic internal conflict that sets them back decades. There's really no way to tell with RL. It's just in it's nature.
 
Last edited:
Sure, they could turn the Sunshine Coast into a metropolitan area like the Gold Coast, but it'd still be smaller than Ipswich/Western Brisbane, Logan/Southern Brisbane, Moreton Bay/Northern Brisbane, etc, in real terms.

My main point was that SEQ3 could become a more attractive option that WA3 in coming decades.

With Gold Coast in the south, a northern team made more sense to me, but that could just as easily be a Moreton Bay-based team. Sunshine Coast just seemed more obvious to me without any real competition (no offence meant to the netball).


But it won’t have enough people to sustain an AFL team. The vast majority of residents prefer NRL. Even with 500k residents in 2040/50 it will still be a much smaller AFL market than Hobart.

Sunshine Coast plus Noosa will have ~600k by 2050, compared to ~290k in Hobart. Much of Sunshine Coast's population growth is fuelled by southern states.

I think to say it will be a much smaller AFL market than Hobart is a bold claim. They'd be different per capita, but probably not that different over all.
 
My main point was that SEQ3 could become a more attractive option that WA3 in coming decades.

With Gold Coast in the south, a northern team made more sense to me, but that could just as easily be a Moreton Bay-based team. Sunshine Coast just seemed more obvious to me without any real competition (no offence meant to the netball).




Sunshine Coast plus Noosa will have ~600k by 2050, compared to ~290k in Hobart. Much of Sunshine Coast's population growth is fuelled by southern states.

I think to say it will be a much smaller AFL market than Hobart is a bold claim. They'd be different per capita, but probably not that different over all.
Not true.

From https://www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au/experience-sunshine-coast/statistics-and-maps/population-growth
  • the number of people moving to the area continues to increase, with over half of new arrivals coming from other parts of Qld, one in three from other States, and one in five from oversea
Most of the 30% coming from other states would be from NSW, so you might at best have 15% from ‘AFL states’. The vast majority of SC residents will prefer RL or AFL.

For the foreseeable future, there will be more AFL fans in Hobart than the SC.
 
Wouldn’t you have to seriously consider a second team in Brisbane if the Lions ended up like West Coast with sellout crowds and a big waiting list of people who can’t get tickets to games?

Because that’s what could happen 20 years from now, footy looks to be going well in Brisbane, right?
 
Not true.

From https://www.sunshinecoast.qld.gov.au/experience-sunshine-coast/statistics-and-maps/population-growth
  • the number of people moving to the area continues to increase, with over half of new arrivals coming from other parts of Qld, one in three from other States, and one in five from oversea
Most of the 30% coming from other states would be from NSW, so you might at best have 15% from ‘AFL states’. The vast majority of SC residents will prefer RL or AFL.

For the foreseeable future, there will be more AFL fans in Hobart than the SC.

Hunter Fujak's Code Wars has interest in AFL in Brisbane at 24%, and 54% in Tasmania.

Extrapolated to the Sunshine Coast and Hobart = 2050 populations of 600k v 290k = AFL fans of 144k to 156k. Hardly "a much smaller AFL market".

I would think the Sunshine Coast had higher interest than Brisbane, so it'd be even closer, if not flipped, by 2050.
 
Sunshine Coast plus Noosa will have ~600k by 2050, compared to ~290k in Hobart. Much of Sunshine Coast's population growth is fuelled by southern states.

I think to say it will be a much smaller AFL market than Hobart is a bold claim. They'd be different per capita, but probably not that different over all.
There would still be fewer people who are even opened minded to the possibility of supporting a Sunshine Coast AFL team (your people that call it fumbleball or whatever would never support a game) than there is equivalent in Hobart, which remains an AFL city - that's the point.

A second Brisbane team is far more likely than a Sunshine Coast team.
 
There would still be fewer people who are even opened minded to the possibility of supporting a Sunshine Coast AFL team (your people that call it fumbleball or whatever would never support a game) than there is equivalent in Hobart, which remains an AFL city - that's the point.

A second Brisbane team is far more likely than a Sunshine Coast team.

I honestly don't care where they put a SEQ3 team, my main point was that as time goes on, it probably becomes a more attractive offer than WA3.
 
Depends how Auckland is looking by then 😉
Yep, could be Brisbane 2 and Auckland and then the next round SW WA and Newcastle. Though somehow I expect NT/NQ to be part of an expansion cycle if we go to 22-24 teams.

And honestly I don’t see why the AFL can’t have that many teams someday. Yes, even 26 but beyond our lifetimes.

Though another QLD/NSW combo wouldn’t surprise me if we go to 22 teams.

Auckland would be a bigger get than either of those though for sure.
 
Hunter Fujak's Code Wars has interest in AFL in Brisbane at 24%, and 54% in Tasmania.

Extrapolated to the Sunshine Coast and Hobart = 2050 populations of 600k v 290k = AFL fans of 144k to 156k. Hardly "a much smaller AFL market".

I would think the Sunshine Coast had higher interest than Brisbane, so it'd be even closer, if not flipped, by 2050.

That book was written right before covid though, the AFL have seen it's biggest boom in QLD post the 2020 season, also helped by southern migration, so the numbers would be a fair bit different now. I actually know two families from down here myself that have moved to the sunshine coast in the past few years.
 
en any builder will tell you you need a stable base

And accurate information and costings which you seem devoid of.
The NT is simply thus the most obvious choice.

Only in your opinion.
Most people have reasoned arguments against N.T. at this time.

For all the talk of Sydney GWS population base will leak to central Sydney and shrink and it has a lack of interest.

i cannot make any sense out of that statement and I don't really care as Western Sydney has more than 10 times the population of the N.T.
AFL can't afford a sinking ship again

The last "sinking ships" i can think of were those that were moved to Sydney and Brisbane.
It's Northern Australia based in Darwin all the way

Hard to manufacture a ship to sink in the first place.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

20th AFL Team

Back
Top