
- Nov 14, 2010
- 47,631
- 55,340
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Top 10 pick plus a young best 22 opposition player otherwise keep
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
I love reading posts like this knowing that at the time it was made, Majak had probably already signed.I think that was mostly public posturing on Talking Footy last night by Brad Scott on Goldstein. Club has something in the works. doesn't take a genius to work out why Majak hasn't signed up. He is waiting to see if the club can facilitate a trade for Goldstein to make sure/ cement his spot in the team week in week out. I am fearful (and very annoyed) that if Todd refuses a trade then we probably will see the back of Majak which would dent our future somewhat
I love reading posts like this knowing that at the time it was made, Majak had probably already signed.
We used to call my mates the 120Y-Bother!Reminds me of the old definition of a 180B. A 120Y with 60 more defects.
Hmmm so does that mean Goldy had accepted a trade? Hmmmm I wonder!!
Nah don't think so! Or do I?
The rumours doing the rounds is he might want a trade to a contender. I doubt anyone actually wants to lose him.The trade Goldstein thing has me fecked.
The bloke is the same age as LT, Selwood, Boak etc. He's hardly a pensioner.
One injury ravaged season has seen him shift from top 3 in AFL player to bait?
While we're at it just noticed the ASX went down a few points time to offload some blue chips. Back in 5.
The rumours doing the rounds is he might want a trade to a contender. I doubt anyone actually wants to lose him.
Trade Goldstein is something spouted on here every year.One injury ravaged season has seen him shift from top 3 in AFL player to bait?
Longer as backup perhaps.Trade Goldstein is something spouted on here every year.
Maybe has more legs this year due to ambiguity of him wanting out and us wanting to reset.
Would have to be overs.
2 top 10 picks.
1 top 10 pick and a starting 18 quick skilful mid.
We'd have to consider it.
However trading him requires us to do a second trade for a quality second string ruckman.
Nothing to do with having an injury ravaged year. All to do with our window closing, a need to significantly rebuild our one paced midfield whilst not having the picks to do so, nor being able to attract quality FA's to add that quality.The trade Goldstein thing has me fecked.
The bloke is the same age as LT, Selwood, Boak etc. He's hardly a pensioner.
One injury ravaged season has seen him shift from top 3 in AFL player to bait?
While we're at it just noticed the ASX went down a few points time to offload some blue chips. Back in 5.
Perfectly saidNothing to do with having an injury ravaged year. All to do with our window closing, a need to significantly rebuild our one paced midfield whilst not having the picks to do so, nor being able to attract quality FA's to add that quality.
Todd is an asset. Assests sometimes need to be moved on when opportunities arise to reinvest in areas requiring significant attention. We would get more from Goldy than anyone else on the list so if a offer came up tht gave us a top ten pick plus something else meaningful we would be mad not to give it serious thought.
Come on KC. You're better than that. What BTron said.The trade Goldstein thing has me fecked.
The bloke is the same age as LT, Selwood, Boak etc. He's hardly a pensioner.
One injury ravaged season has seen him shift from top 3 in AFL player to bait?
While we're at it just noticed the ASX went down a few points time to offload some blue chips. Back in 5.
While we're at it just noticed the ASX went down a few points time to offload some blue chips. Back in 5.
Liked that post for the sneaky 90's referenceI look forward to your return Mack.
The irony is even despite injuries hindering Goldy this year, he still had as good a season as he did in 2013/14 when he was right in the mix for AA selection (actually made the initial squad in 2013)...Fact is he had probably the most complete year ever by a ruckman last year in terms of the ways he was able to impact a game and how frequently he did it which was always going to be hard to top and even match with full health, let alone with obvious constraints...
Would leave a major hole if he were to request a trade this year (though I'm cynical he will)...Not sure Maj has the tank to take up much more slack in the ruck (think he's better suited to playing a predominantly forward role anyway with his explosiveness) and Brown you just want forward given what he was able to do up there this year...Not aware of any ready-made replacements in the feeder teams either, so really hoping this Goldy trade chat dissipates..
North doesn't play guys with injuries.
If Goldy was injured, all he had to do was say was sore and let Maj ruck.
He did not do that once in 2016.
I reckon the last 70% of Goldie's year was just utter sh1te.
No sting or vigour. Does he really want to be at North? I'm not sure.
Richmond game?If Goldy was injured, all he had to do was say was sore and let Maj ruck.
He did not do that once in 2016.
Come on KC. You're better than that. What BTron said.
I do enjoy when posters like Naturally north, ozzyozlo, myself, and more post the trade goldstein stuff and apparently it's the most preposterous thing anyone has even said. Then BTron says it (albeit with better wording but still the same theme) and it's fine and posters start to come around.
3 weeks ago i said a similar thing and 'only forwards' melted his keypad and i was stoned.
I read a similar thing happening once:
-the north posters took up stones again to stone him. Uber answered them, "i showed you may good works from the goldy trade to help with the reset; for which of them are you stoning me?" The north posters answered him, "for a good work we do not stone you, but for blasphemy; and because you, being a man, make yourself out to be a god list manager." (Scott 10:30-33)
2016 years and we still haven't learnt a bloody thing!