Preview 2nd Elimination Final, 2023: St.Kilda v GWS - MCG, Saturday 9th September, 3:20PM AEST *WEBSTER 150TH* *BATTLE 100TH*

Who Wins?

  • Saints

    Votes: 85 86.7%
  • Giants

    Votes: 13 13.3%

  • Total voters
    98

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
If it's in the same area as the previous, no doubt, if nowhere near, doubt it as wouldn't want to risk it from cold start. Stocker just squeezed, has kinda Sharmans problem for mine in that he goes missing in games and Webster is just preferred is all. Could probably only carry one sicne you're banking Nas and Sincs with Windy there.

Between him and Byrnes for sub
Byrnes has been named as sub
Don't usually name them this early do they?
Screenshot_20230907-181751_AFL.jpg
 
just thought that Doogs needed to be in the team just incase Cordz was getting worked over for closing speed on a heavy and wide MCG. The midfield looks slow and vulnerable, any how handy would it have been to have Zac in there to add some grunt and speed, obviously not ready. Sebby coming back is a massive positive but hopefully the pegs hold up. And finally I think we will be a man short with a certain player, don't think he's made for finals yet.

But as they say, if there is grass on the pitch...then let's play.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

just thought that Doogs needed to be in the team just incase Cordz was getting worked over for closing speed on a heavy and wide MCG. The midfield looks slow and vulnerable, any how handy would it have been to have Zac in there to add some grunt and speed, obviously not ready. Sebby coming back is a massive positive but hopefully the pegs hold up. And finally I think we will be a man short with a certain player, don't think he's made for finals yet.

But as they say, if there is grass on the pitch...then let's play.
The named team is basically full strength. Don’t know how you can be unhappy with it.
 
It’s confusing.
It means he was the sub last round.
They need to fix that next year.
Sub not named yet.
They do that every week.

Yep this, and it's an indication metric in case the listed sub plays zero minutes in a match to state "was named as an onfield emergency" type for stats things.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The named team is basically full strength. Don’t know how you can be unhappy with it.
He's trolling
Thrives of it

Luckily we all like giving him crap
Kamala Harris Yes GIF by The Democrats
 
The right call was made


Like anything, it probably shouldn't have even been a suspension. That's irrelevant in this case. They have tried to make it more like court where the only way you can take it this far is to show that it was unreasonable or an error of law. They have basically overridden the system and made the system look like a joke court.
 
Bedford - what a crock of sh it. I’m really getting angry angry at the times we have accepted suspensions now without pulling apart semantics. If the afl procedure is going to be so susceptible to legal scrutiny, it’s time it was overhauled.

It was more media scrutiny than legal scrutiny that got it overturned, the AFL heard the uproar about it and decided they better let him off.

To be honest he shouldn't have been suspended in the first place so we can't complain too much but they have ignored the uproar over other stupid suspensions like the Ryder and Long suspensions in previous years or the Sicily one this year.

The whole system is a joke with no consistency or common sense, how Tom McCartin got off after his head high bump just defies belief.
 
Stocker very unlucky imo
But it looks a good side


Stocker is a slower accountable tough one on one defender. I'd say that we are looking to match them in the midfield where they have multiple guns. If it gets into defence too often we are ****ed anyway. Might as well try to hold it up further up the field IMO.
 
He's trolling
Thrives of it

Luckily we all like giving him crap
Kamala Harris Yes GIF by The Democrats


Most trolls thrive on attention so even interacting probably gives him what he wants.
 
Most trolls thrive on attention so even interacting probably gives him what he wants.
Gives me good gif practice
Cloris Leachman Yes GIF by Lez Bomb Movie


Anyhoo

Someone was gonna be stiff to miss with Max and Ross looking likely to come in
Can't say many of us would've picked stocks but oh well there we have it
Team looks good imo all basses covered
Coops the swingman/can do it all legend still in, skunk playing ok (surprised me) and I laughed at cordy coming in at the start.
Windy looking good off HB, pou and Owens ready to tear it up, Max is due.
Nas setting us up from the backline
O9F5SOm.gif


We'll win this

giphy - 2020-12-18T173222.703.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top