Would like to remind everyone who is currently having a cry about no 1st round draft pick this year.
Samson Ryan:
Samson Ryan:
Draft | No. 40, 2020 AFL draft |
---|
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Draft | No. 40, 2020 AFL draft |
---|
Would like to remind everyone who is currently having a cry about no 1st round draft pick this year.
Samson Ryan:
Draft No. 40, 2020 AFL draft
Not sure about that Ed. Not yet anyway.Spot on …. it’s why all this ‘panic’ about the Hopper F1 pick and TT trade is just stupid.
Having a look at the 2020 draft, in a re-done draft Samson Ryan definitely goes top-10. In a re-do of the 2019 draft Cumberland goes top-20. As we know, Bolton goes top-3. Balta goes top-10. Baker top-10. Of course the odds of getting a ‘better’ player increase higher up the draft order, but there’s very little chance of getting anyone better than TT at 12 or 19 (he was pick #2 for a reason).
And for whatever weird reason we seem to do better with picks 25+ anyway.
Samson Ryan looks like being an absolute beauty, and exactly what we need for the future. He showed more in a shocking game against GC in his 7th game than CCJ has shown his entire career thus far. He’s got ‘Joe the goose’ Chol well covered too!
Thank heavens we didn’t give up $1m per season for 4-years to keep CJ and Chol on the list….oh my ! The melting in BF was hard when we lost both those guys, but once again, the club knew better than BF experts.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Very happy with Sampson. 2 more years of physical development and he will be able to compete with the monsters. Looks like a future KPF and ruck. We need a mobile KPF to work with him. But nice way to fill a hole in our list.
Very happy with Sampson. 2 more years of physical development and he will be able to compete with the monsters. Looks like a future KPF and ruck. We need a mobile KPF to work with him. But nice way to fill a hole in our list.
He needs more strength but also a bigger tank to run better. As you say, 2 more pre-seasons, very interesting to see how he looks physically and craft wise as a 24yo. His skill and intent look first rate.
Him and Lynch or another lynch type down the track would work fine together.
As long as the “third tall” isn’t slow.
Bit harsh, 50/50 maybe. At least he had a crack at it.Think it was 20% skill 80% tin assness but how good was that roving goal out of the ruck
I think he'll end up a ruckman after Nank retires. He's 2nd in the league of all ruckman for hitout to advantage % and 15th for hitout win %. Pretty impressive for a bloke that's played 6 games. Fortunately, he looks like a legit forward option too.Going to ask an odd question - should we bother developing him as a ruckman at all? He’s a more than competent key forward with a great kick, decent leading and key forwards are worth their weight in gold. He seems (currently) too light for rucking - easily pushed off the ball by Witts on the weekend - and just doesn’t seem overly skilled at it. It seems every ruckman at some point does a PCL in the ruck and quite a few end up with syndesmosis injuries in the last few years.
Is he too valuable at this stage to play in the ruck and should we even bother moving forward?
Going to ask an odd question - should we bother developing him as a ruckman at all? He’s a more than competent key forward with a great kick, decent leading and key forwards are worth their weight in gold. He seems (currently) too light for rucking - easily pushed off the ball by Witts on the weekend - and just doesn’t seem overly skilled at it. It seems every ruckman at some point does a PCL in the ruck and quite a few end up with syndesmosis injuries in the last few years.
Is he too valuable at this stage to play in the ruck and should we even bother moving forward?
I wouldn't call him a great kick, I'd say decent enough for his height.Going to ask an odd question - should we bother developing him as a ruckman at all? He’s a more than competent key forward with a great kick, decent leading and key forwards are worth their weight in gold. He seems (currently) too light for rucking - easily pushed off the ball by Witts on the weekend - and just doesn’t seem overly skilled at it. It seems every ruckman at some point does a PCL in the ruck and quite a few end up with syndesmosis injuries in the last few years.
Is he too valuable at this stage to play in the ruck and should we even bother moving forward?
Good question...at this early stage I just see him being managed forward then ruck relief...Going to ask an odd question - should we bother developing him as a ruckman at all? He’s a more than competent key forward with a great kick, decent leading and key forwards are worth their weight in gold. He seems (currently) too light for rucking - easily pushed off the ball by Witts on the weekend - and just doesn’t seem overly skilled at it. It seems every ruckman at some point does a PCL in the ruck and quite a few end up with syndesmosis injuries in the last few years.
Is he too valuable at this stage to play in the ruck and should we even bother moving forward?
I used to love that feeling