Having the bont on fire didn’t help. All other reasons considered, Swap him in our team ( for anyone of our mids) and I bet the scores would’ve been a lot closer.As I said I've been critical of Noah for that lack of defensive accountability and concentration, but suggesting that his deficiencies in these areas is the reason the oppositions whole back line have a lot of score involvements is wrong. As mentioned we're ranked 2nd for turnovers conceded, so it's more likely that when we do turnover the ball heading into our F50 that we get exposed on the counter.
Add to this that score involvements occur when a player is involved in a chain of play that results in a score. So if you've got a team that uses a lot of short possession chip and mark, like the Dogs do, players can rack up a large number of score involvements. The Dogs had 31 scores last night, but a whopping 132 score involvements, which suggests that a lot of chip and mark build up play saw a number of players getting involved and getting credited with a score involvement.