Shinboner1
Norm Smith Medallist
- Aug 13, 2020
- 9,452
- 17,815
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
Better than CCJI actually think CCJ would help along with teakle
Teakle and larks the 2 key forwards
CJ the second ruck rotating off the bench w
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Better than CCJI actually think CCJ would help along with teakle
Teakle and larks the 2 key forwards
CJ the second ruck rotating off the bench w
AgreedBetter than CCJ
I've sat pretty much behind the goals on L1 for several matches this season and was able to watch CCJ up close in quite a few forward entry contests.by studding his boots???
accept it CCJs ship has sailed along with biggies, the richmond reject program is officially dead. the dream is over.
The point is teakle has shown he can be very dangerous forward and can play a more KPF role as opposed to second ruck role which CJ could doAt this point Teakle has made CCJ completely redundant. They play the same role and he is playing it better than CCJ ever has.
Obviously a small sample size but when you factor in the achilles, I'd be surprised if CCJ even plays another five games when you factor in Xerri's development as well
The point is teakle has shown he can be very dangerous forward and can play a more KPF role as opposed to second ruck role which CJ could do
You’d trade Coleman-Jones for anything you can get.Hence "when you factor in Xerri's development as well"
The amount of time X spends in the ruck is only going to increase over the next 2-3 seasons. I actually don't think CCJ is the worst ruck going around but there's no place for him if X and Teakle are both in the side
but he cant ruck! and after the achilies will be aven more of a liability, its hard to actually comprehend where you see the 22 better with ccj in? who goes out?? oh thats right, scott and pink...By allowing to teakle to play mainly forward
Cj as the second ruck
you would actually just pay him out while we have room in the cap and take it as penance for such a poor decision. In ccjs defence the club did offer him the contract, he would have been silly not to sign it.You’d trade Coleman-Jones for anything you can get.
One of the worst list management decisions since the dawn of time.
Yeah, it’s not his fault.you would actually just pay him out while we have room in the cap and take it as penance for such a poor decision. In ccjs defence the club did offer him the contract, he would have been silly not to sign it.
well i argue he cant but the bigger issue is where do you hide him for the 80 percent of the game X is rucking?? rotating off the bench is the most stupid suggestion when you could have a quality mid like will there and are stealing rotations which are capped of course.The point is teakle has shown he can be very dangerous forward and can play a more KPF role as opposed to second ruck role which CJ could do
Forward and off the benchwell i argue he cant but the bigger issue is where do you hide him for the 80 percent of the game X is rucking??
even worse, so he is forward getting in teakles and souvas way with the game in the balance, do you even think out these fantasies??Forward and off the bench
No he’s providing another avenue to goal unlike pinkeven worse, so he is forward getting in teakles and souvas way with the game in the balance, do you even think out these fantasies??
His time will come...Teaks was also ignored on the lead a couple of times during the game. Players obviously still looking for Larks, PC and Zurhar. Could have been hit up a couple more times IMO.
His time will come… come?His time will come...
I've got no doubt he knows this is probably he's last chance at afl, he ain't going to leave any stone untuned, will be my one to watch over the preseason. he's a lot more skilled then I thought, gives of a lot of plays on the wing pretty quickly.
Clarko, referenced to the above quoted post, players will kick him the ball more regularly on the lead if he goal kicking keeps up.His time will come… come?
Or like Alistair Clarkson, his time will come?
You're right - he was wide open and ignored regularly. He had to take pack marks for his two goals. If we actually start kicking it to him when he's free, watch out.Teaks was also ignored on the lead a couple of times during the game. Players obviously still looking for Larks, PC and Zurhar. Could have been hit up a couple more times IMO.
Talent alone don't mean shit when you have the IQ of an ant, Sleevo and CCJ are prime example,s and fwiw CCJ don't even have talent, got by with his height and the old big blokes take time slogan. Richmond could clearly see 4 years ago what you still haven't figured out.No he’s providing another avenue to goal unlike pink
But allowing teakle to stay forward whilst he goes and chops out X
It’s pretty simple in terms of talent teakle>CJ>pink
The footy gods are cruel but they also have a damn good sense of humour, this time next year you'll be claiming you are the footy trade whisperer for seeing what no-one else could, AA baby..I still can’t believe that when we drafted this bloke, I made a tongue in cheek comment about him making the All Australia, and now he most likely will. How good.
Yep, Simpkin had an easy 20m kick option to him on a fast break in the 3rd but decided to bomb it long to Zurhaar instead.Teaks was also ignored on the lead a couple of times during the game. Players obviously still looking for Larks, PC and Zurhar. Could have been hit up a couple more times IMO.
Not mobile enough with Larkey, CCJ and Elmo. Pink works because of his mobility.Agreed
But cj better than pink
Cj second ruck
Teakle mainly forward
Much more dangerous with teakle and larkey forward than pink and larkey