Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I heard the comment the other day that Trump thinks that because he won the election that means he owns America like it was one of his companies, and therefore it is there to be exploited for purely personal interest. I've seen nothing to indicate that this isn't the case.He's mistaken what's in the best interests of Donald Trump for being what's in the best intersts of America.
There are many more reasons to believe that the Senate Committee's report is true than the bullshit that comes out of you two.
Today Russia steps in to Syria to take control of the vacuum Trump is leaving behind: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...-safe-zone-joint-patrols-191022171933484.html
Would this have happened if Clinton was President? Hard to imagine it.
Are you guys sure it was Clinton and not Trump they wanted in the White House?
Maybe Clinton wasn't as bought and sold as you thought? Maybe they had reason to believe that through incompetency or pliability they would get better outcomes from a Trump presidency? Maybe Trump isn't so unpredictable after all?
Because Russian (Or USA) involvements in the middle east have really worked extremely well for them right?
You don’t have to be a competent criminal to engage in criminal activity. Judges have been known to advise a defendant to find another line of business.Because Russian (Or USA) involvements in the middle east have really worked extremely well for them right?
Coz you most likely watch cnn or drunk.I heard the comment the other day that Trump thinks that because he won the election that means he owns America like it was one of his companies, and therefore it is there to be exploited for purely personal interest. I've seen nothing to indicate that this isn't the case.
It was on the Daily Show.Coz you most likely watch cnn or drunk.
It was on the Daily Show.
I think I read it somewhere all the same, but either that's the origin or it's just a blindingly obvious, common take
Whether it is good policy for the US to leave or the Russians to enter is an entirely separate topic of discussion. I'm not a fan of foreign intervention and think that it almost invariably causes more problems than it solves. The middle east is largely the mess it is in now as a result of imperialism.
The point is that it is clear that right now the Russians are getting what they want. All the while the conspiracy theorists are telling us that the Russians didn't really want Trump in the Presidency, they preferred Clinton, who would almost certainly not have been withdrawing US troops and abandoning the Kurds to the Turks and Russians. It is nonsense.
You don’t have to be a competent criminal to engage in criminal activity. Judges have been known to advise a defendant to find another line of business.
Kids literally get held back from 4th grade for better critical reasoning skills than Trump and his supporters display.
Maybe ask the 8 million refugees from Syria about the Obama era. There is some 6 million of them in Turkey - catch a plane have a chat with them about US military assistance.There are many more reasons to believe that the Senate Committee's report is true than the bullshit that comes out of you two.
Today Russia steps in to Syria to take control of the vacuum Trump is leaving behind: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019...-safe-zone-joint-patrols-191022171933484.html
Would this have happened if Clinton was President? Hard to imagine it.
Are you guys sure it was Clinton and not Trump they wanted in the White House?
Maybe Clinton wasn't as bought and sold as you thought? Maybe they had reason to believe that through incompetency or pliability they would get better outcomes from a Trump presidency? Maybe Trump isn't so unpredictable after all?
I disagree, the fact of whether it is good policy is the most relevant point of discussion.
Putin is getting what he wants (control of northern Syria) = Mastermind Russia outsmarting the US.
Trump is getting what he wants (pulling out) = Disaster foreign policy catastrophe.
That's the mentality you are taking, it's fine to disagree with the decision I mostly disagree with it as well but not even trying to understand where it comes from is wrong.
I'm sure the Syrians are pissed off about American involvement in their country and rightly so.Maybe ask the 8 million refugees from Syria about the Obama era. There is some 6 million of them in Turkey - catch a plane have a chat with them about US military assistance.
Maybe stop repeating CNN talking points too
That isn't the mentality I'm taking at all and I see no reason why you would read that in to what I wrote. I'm simply pointing out that right now US policy is giving the Russian's what they want in a way that would not be conceivable had Clinton beaten Trump at a time when some would have you believe that the Russians would rather Clinton as President than Trump.
I wouldn’t be hanging my hat on winning a contest that had a 49.5/50.5 outcome likelihood.I disagree, the fact of whether it is good policy is the most relevant point of discussion.
Putin is getting what he wants (control of northern Syria) = Mastermind Russia outsmarting the US.
Trump is getting what he wants (pulling out) = Disaster foreign policy catastrophe.
That's the mentality you are taking, it's fine to disagree with the decision I mostly disagree with it as well but not even trying to understand where it comes from is wrong.
I think the competency part was proven when he wiped the floor with "The most qualified candidate in history" whose turn it was no less.
You really think Clinton would be pulling the US out of the middle east like Trump is right now? Clinton the warmongerer, that's who we are talking about? The messaging has been loud and clear from Clinton opponents and Trump supporters for some time - Trump was going to get the US out of the wars that Clinton was happy to keep the entangled in indefinitely. And now you are telling me it is conceivable that Clinton would have acted in the same way as Trump just did, creating a vacuum that the Russians were stepping in to fill after just a few days? At least be consistent...Considering Hillary's track record on "Russia reset" and "Uranium one" I think it is very conceivable to see Clinton giving the Russians anything they want.
I don't need to catch a plan to Turkey to speak to them. I know that they are homeless because they are afraid of returning home to Syria while Syria is under the control of President al-Assad. And having Russian troops in Syria doesn't make things better for the refugees, it makes things worse.Maybe ask the 8 million refugees from Syria about the Obama era. There is some 6 million of them in Turkey - catch a plane have a chat with them about US military assistance.
Maybe stop repeating CNN talking points too
It was on the Daily Show.
It's no secret that Russia wanted access to a port in the Mediterranean so that they weren't bottlenecked through the Bospherus Straits and more importantly somewhere where they could replenish their submarine fleet.I disagree, the fact of whether it is good policy is the most relevant point of discussion.
Putin is getting what he wants (control of northern Syria) = Mastermind Russia outsmarting the US.
If he was in this for the money maybe he'd be taking a wage and not letting his business decline. But oh wait.. he isn't.
Russia was invited by Assad to help at the height of the refugee crisis when the Syria was splintering into 6 different territories and ISIS was in full control of large swathes of land and oil.I'm sure the Syrians are pissed off about American involvement in their country and rightly so.
I'm not saying the Americans should be there. I am saying that under Clinton they would still be there and under Trump they are leaving. Which one of those is better for Russia?
It was ignored when I posted a fewdays agoSince Hillary is being discussed on this page, I wonder how the conspiracy theorists are coping given that the investigation into her emails is over and as usual - NOTHING TO SEE. So still a nothing burger. No more 'Lock her up' by the serial 'Liar in Chief' aka #fakepresident.
The embarrassing epilogue to the media’s obsession with Hillary Clinton’s emails
Maybe Clinton’s emails shouldn’t have been covered as if they were the single most important issue facing 2016 voters?www.vox.com
Worthwhile posting the following for certain posters on here.
View attachment 769185