<transitive> ot <intransitive> ?this is the Luke Beveridge fallacy...
some depth is good.
too much depth will hinder
*how so?
someone else answer... but if players feel uncertain come selection time, those with concerns, and doubts, it will reflect on their season long performance. The counter position, it would actually steel<verb> the 22 with vigour and self-confidence. Plus immaculate discipline off-the-field.
so I may be incorrect. But as I call it, the LukeBeveridge fallacy.
Another Hawthorn fallacy is players need to have the potential to play in multiple positions, "flexibility" is the word du jour, and rolled out in support of Pickett Richmond iteration choppy.
Well, this would not fit with the key to our back 6, them having an acute intimacy and knowing the running patterns of all their 5 back teammates...
again, I could provide you with the positives and counter-factual, but I believe it is a Clarko/Beveridge/Dimma w@nk of self-justification and self-adulation. Just like this stupid post of mine here.