What time is the hearing? Watched 360 last night for the first time in a while and cannot believe the trial by media on Lynch. They never said a word when Dangerflog walked for KOing Vlas or when GAJ was doing his Macho Man Randy Savage impersonation every week, but the minute Lynch gets a bloke high he should be rubbed out. Just about had a gut full
Player Watch #50 Marlion Pickett Retirement
- Thread starter Marcel Proust
- Start date
- Tagged users None
The biggest AFL Club in the Land gets the biggest attention however undeserved! (makes the minnows feel competitive!)
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
what time does the hearing start ? want to see marlion in a suit
Only way he gets off is if the charge is down graded to low impact and for all honesty i dont see why it shouldnt with the dawks player continue to play and no concussion.
I cant remember has Marlion been suspended many times ?
Surely a $2000 fine will be enough
I cant remember has Marlion been suspended many times ?
Surely a $2000 fine will be enough
LIVE NOW TRIBUNAL PICKETT - SCROLL DOWN
www.foxsports.com.au
Tiger’s ban stands after ‘3 out of 10’ claim; Swan falls short despite bump debate
Tiger’s ban stands after ‘3 out of 10’ claim; Swan falls short despite bump debate
www.foxsports.com.au
3/10 - ohhhh Marlion thats beautiful ...LIVE NOW TRIBUNAL PICKETT - SCROLL DOWN
Tiger’s ban stands after ‘3 out of 10’ claim; Swan falls short despite bump debate
Tiger’s ban stands after ‘3 out of 10’ claim; Swan falls short despite bump debate
- Sep 11, 2018
- 42,477
- 43,008
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Storm|V/OzCricket|NBA-P|NHL-P|V8|F1
Pickett: I tucked my arm in to make the shepherd as safe as possible.
Asked to grade how much effort he put into the contact on a scale of 1-10, Pickett says three.
Asked to grade his speed on a scale of 1-10, Pickett says three.
Richmond is trying to argue impact was 'low' rather than 'medium'.
Richmond citing an incident between Levi Casboult and Alex Pearce in 2021, which was judged as 'low' impact, saying the potential to cause injury in that incident was greater than Pickett's.
AFL citing Tribunal guidelines: Any high bump that constitutes rough conduct that has the potential to cause injury will usually be graded as 'medium' impact. Saying the matter is "crystal clear".
AFL: It was more good luck than good technique that Moore was not injured.
The momentum in the Casboult case was "significantly less" than Pickett's, which was a "decision to bump".
Richmond: We say this is a case of good management and bad luck that high contact occurred at all.
Richmond: There was no appreciable risk here of anything more than what happened eventuating ... he's not travelling at excessive speed, did not apply excessive force, went low and tucked in, stayed low to the ground.
Richmond: He took reasonable steps to execute a perfect bump and, aside from some secondary contact and glancing high contact, that's exactly what he did.
Richmond: Moore reacts to the contact in exactly the way you'd expect from someone who's received force to their body and chest and shoulder as opposed to the head.
Richmond pointing to the fact no one attempted to remonstrate with Pickett and suggests there is "good reason for it".
Richmond: In terms of the potential risk to cause injury, that risk didn't exist that what would occur was anything more than what happened, which was no injury at all.
5min ago... The jury is now deliberating.
Asked to grade how much effort he put into the contact on a scale of 1-10, Pickett says three.
Asked to grade his speed on a scale of 1-10, Pickett says three.
Richmond is trying to argue impact was 'low' rather than 'medium'.
Richmond citing an incident between Levi Casboult and Alex Pearce in 2021, which was judged as 'low' impact, saying the potential to cause injury in that incident was greater than Pickett's.
AFL citing Tribunal guidelines: Any high bump that constitutes rough conduct that has the potential to cause injury will usually be graded as 'medium' impact. Saying the matter is "crystal clear".
AFL: It was more good luck than good technique that Moore was not injured.
The momentum in the Casboult case was "significantly less" than Pickett's, which was a "decision to bump".
Richmond: We say this is a case of good management and bad luck that high contact occurred at all.
Richmond: There was no appreciable risk here of anything more than what happened eventuating ... he's not travelling at excessive speed, did not apply excessive force, went low and tucked in, stayed low to the ground.
Richmond: He took reasonable steps to execute a perfect bump and, aside from some secondary contact and glancing high contact, that's exactly what he did.
Richmond: Moore reacts to the contact in exactly the way you'd expect from someone who's received force to their body and chest and shoulder as opposed to the head.
Richmond pointing to the fact no one attempted to remonstrate with Pickett and suggests there is "good reason for it".
Richmond: In terms of the potential risk to cause injury, that risk didn't exist that what would occur was anything more than what happened, which was no injury at all.
5min ago... The jury is now deliberating.
Why nothing on AFL app?
Are they going to let him off for sentimentality and try and sweep under the rug?
Are they going to let him off for sentimentality and try and sweep under the rug?
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
they are going to let him off
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
welcome to the thread bro
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #3,590
Bastards
tigersab
TIGERLAND
- Mar 16, 2020
- 1,533
- 3,794
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Richmond's appeal has failed.
Marlion Pickett's one-match ban stands.
In the words of Jim Richards… Packoarseholes!
What absolute bullshit. Was a legit bump.
Marlion Pickett's one-match ban stands.
In the words of Jim Richards… Packoarseholes!
What absolute bullshit. Was a legit bump.
Why do we always try to fight the wrong grading
Should've gone the not high argument
Should've gone the not high argument
1 week stands
Pickett taking it to the supreme court
Pickett taking it to the supreme court
Barnzy
Premium Platinum
What a joke.
I honestly find it hard to watch the game these days. Perfect bumps are suspensions
Umps paying frees and 50's every 5 seconds. Game going down the toilet
I honestly find it hard to watch the game these days. Perfect bumps are suspensions
Umps paying frees and 50's every 5 seconds. Game going down the toilet
ok tigers please insist he run out and lead the team thru the banner with his footy gear on
Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
thats some racist shit
Barnzy
Premium Platinum
Literally the perfect bump. Tell me where the head high contact is?
_RT_
Community Leader
- Sep 17, 2006
- 47,526
- 93,160
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Furies Premiers 2010
- Moderator
- #3,600
Reason for Pickett decision via Tribunal chairman:
Pickett approached and executed the bump with momentum, and Moore himself was moving with momentum. There was a realistic potential of head, facial or concussive injury.
The jury did not consider that the Casboult example was sufficiently comparable as the circumstances and momentum of the players were different to that here.
Pickett approached and executed the bump with momentum, and Moore himself was moving with momentum. There was a realistic potential of head, facial or concussive injury.
The jury did not consider that the Casboult example was sufficiently comparable as the circumstances and momentum of the players were different to that here.
Similar threads
