Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you think they are all funded by Isis or the Kremlin? It's unbelievable the USA should lock them up in gitmolol. dick gage and his band of merry men. 9 years of failure
Do you think they are all funded by Isis or the Kremlin? It's unbelievable the USA should lock them up in gitmo
Ooh that is little bit personalnope. dick is funded by idiots like you. even though he's achieved exactly nothing in almost a decade, morons keep donating to him.
Don't be questioning the official 911 narrative over here man, u gonna get your ass whooped. When is the long live idiot gonna pull out the Ol' conspiracy theorist comeback line. You know when he can't find nothing useful to say, he gonna use that one against you on another thread now.Ooh that is little bit personal
But I have noticed sometimes my credit card doesn't balance.
I do believe dick is genuine in his beliefs
And I suspect there may be a very special hell reserved for those who are consciously disingenuous. Just seems a fair thing - don't you think.
It was removed, much of it sold as scrap. I don't think I've seen anyone argue that it "disintegrated" into nothingness
On my tv there were all these towers and then some bloke saidIt was removed, much of it sold as scrap. I don't think I've seen anyone argue that it "disintegrated" into nothingness
LASER BEAMS AND ALIEN LIFE FORMS!!you'll sometimes hear these or similar assertions from the dyed-in-the-wool nuts. also the "dustification" (not joking) of the concrete due to (again, not joking) directed energy weapons. gravity + giant hollow tube just isn't sexy enough i'm afraid.
It was removed, much of it sold as scrap. I don't think I've seen anyone argue that it "disintegrated" into nothingness
I'm not sure what that video is meant to prove or what your argument is - are you saying buildings that had been there since 1973 were actually fake and that justifies all and every conspiracy theory?Doesn't it?
And those who doubt the official story are called nutters. Wow?I'm not sure what that video is meant to prove or what your argument is - are you saying buildings that had been there since 1973 were actually fake and that justifies all and every conspiracy theory?
Or that all of the debris was actually a cleverly designed plot to hide the fact that buildings that had been there since 1973 were actually made of dust and the US government covered this fact up so they could eventually kill a bunch of their own civilians to justify going to war with Iraq?
I didn't see a "steel spire disintegrate" - it looks like part of a concrete side beam crumbling, as concrete is strong under longitudinal force but weak under lateral force. It's on the side of the building, not the top spire.And those who doubt the official story are called nutters. Wow?
What the video shows is the steel spire disintegrates. As to what that means?
I don't know maybe Martians did it
Ae9/11 architects and engineers suspect it was nano thermite - but hey let's go with tesla s death ray
The most logical explanation is that a tactical nuke was used on WTC1 & 2. The conspiracy theorist would say that Stars Wars was used to cause disintegration!I didn't see a "steel spire disintegrate" - it looks like part of a concrete side beam crumbling, as concrete is strong under longitudinal force but weak under lateral force. It's on the side of the building, not the top spire.
It seems like conspiracy theorists are clutching at straws to try and justify secret cabals of boogiemen, rather than the most obvious answers (i.e. a plane was flown into a building). Occam's Razor etc etc
So the towers had vertical concrete beams?I didn't see a "steel spire disintegrate" - it looks like part of a concrete side beam crumbling, as concrete is strong under longitudinal force but weak under lateral force. It's on the side of the building, not the top spire.
It seems like conspiracy theorists are clutching at straws to try and justify secret cabals of boogiemen, rather than the most obvious answers (i.e. a plane was flown into a building). Occam's Razor etc etc
You can try and patronize me all you like, but if you don't even realize that concrete is used in the construction of modern skyscrapers this (admittedly tenuous) discussion is miles away from any sense. A simple look at the towers will show you that the outside of the buildings utilized concrete extensively.So the towers had vertical concrete beams?
You are a funny man
even if it were a concrete beam why would it turn to dust when there is no longer any force applied to it
It had to be subject to enormous heat
Sadly there is a cluster **** of vertical and horizontal steel
I will now count to 3 and you will then awake from your hypnotic state and feel no cognitive dissonance - indeed you will feel emboldened and inspired to deprogram mankind
1 banana 2 banana 3!
Hi there!
Ummm what is reinforced concrete?You can try and patronize me all you like, but if you don't even realize that concrete is used in the construction of modern skyscrapers this (admittedly tenuous) discussion is miles away from any sense. A simple look at the towers will show you that the outside of the buildings utilized concrete extensively.
View attachment 202964
The outside of the towers were concrete with some reinforced concrete, not steel as you claim.
Now, look here:
View attachment 202965
Why is there debris?
You've claimed it turned to dust.
Rebar mostly.Ummm what is reinforced concrete?
You think it's reinforced with what?
Umm reinforced with steelRebar mostly.
Again, what is your point?
Do you think the buildings were fake or real?
Helluva job by the US government to have people regularly utilize two towers between 73 & 01 if they were fake!