Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
1) the more important question is what can create enough heat to make aluminium burn?mate, I don't know the details but
1) what temperature does aluminium burn at?
2) what did they do with the passengers including the australian and chinese national
3) how did they convince an airline that a plane that supposedly crashed but didn't disappear
4) how does a conspiracy like that, involving so many people remain unresolved other than on youtube?
I read the document in its entirety some 10 years ago when I first became enraged and convinced that the whole thing was just planned. So I can't recall the exact pagesthanks for the link
I will read tonight. Is there a section I should pay special attention towards?
My troll - why bother if you have no interest - we have debated this and every time you runaway to mummy. Don't you remember before you decided any discourse with me would be exclusively ad hominems? You narrated your truther past and how you found yourself in the gutter of life, homeless, pissed on and many other degradations. And then your Damascus moment where you realised fox and cnn would embrace you and now you are born again - free of doubt. And none shall doubt.* you're. and lol yeah, im "desperate" to point out you never read the document you're claiming as a source
1) the more important question is what can create enough heat to make aluminium burn?
2) how the hell should I know
3) ditto
4) ditto - well hundreds of thousands were involved in building the atom bomb in secret - it's sad but you can't get the mainstream media to even speculate - the holocaust was kept secret - JFK assassination - Stalin's purges - Reichstag fire - see when it's them and not us it becomes folk lore with little but an accusation - stolen generation - Catholic priests sodomizing boys - domestic violence - Sadams WMDs - Abu graib - gizmo -
There are secrets everywhere. The problem here is the sheer bloody minded evil of it. How could the number required keep so cravenly silent. But if you care to actually look - there are confessions and testimonies available (some nutty but most cast serious doubt on the official story)
The sad thing is that Australia is one of the most gullible populace in the world. In most places around Europe and even America a greater portion of the public suspect foul play then we do. We are dumb - just turn on your free to air tv for a few minutes.
My troll - why bother if you have no interest - we have debated this and every time you runaway to mummy.
Don't you remember before you decided any discourse with me would be exclusively ad hominems?
You narrated your truther past and how you found yourself in the gutter of life, homeless, pissed on and many other degradations. And then your Damascus moment where you realised fox and cnn would embrace you and now you are born again - free of doubt. And none shall doubt.
I read the document in its entirety some 10 years ago
I was watching tv series of Lock stock and 2 smoking barrels on ABC, I thought that was a mind blowing plot twist for the first minute or so. Had no idea the buildings would actually disintegrate as they did so went to bed after number 2 hit. I still find it unlikely that they would fall at freefall speed after being hit by an aeroplane, which is really made very flimsily. Its like an aluminium can breaking a concrete pillar.Young me was traumatized that Cheez TV wasn't on, then mum came in and told me... scary shit.
I still find it unlikely that they would fall at freefall speed
Its like an aluminium can breaking a concrete pillar.
The Pentagon hit was odd, and the official story that barely trained terrorist hit the buildings so precisely is odd too.
While I did qualify that statement in the edit, 2 things- 1 it still fell really fast. 2 those pieces could have been impacted from above, giving them additional acceleration. The construction must have been pretty shitty, if the fire was the cause of the fall, and even worse if the aluminiun can plane was.it's more than 14 years since it happened, why on earth are you still repeating this stuff?
grabbed the first relevant google image search i could find. there are plenty more for you to find on your own if you want.
i can't be bothered drawing on the image and re-uploading it, so words will have to do.
can you see the debris? see how it is out-pacing the upper structure that's driving the building's collapse? that is what is falling at free fall speed. quite obviously the upper part is not.
14 years ffs.
While I did qualify that statement in the edit, 2 things- 1 it still fell really fast. 2 those pieces could have been impacted from above, giving them additional acceleration. The construction must have been pretty shitty, if the fire was the cause of the fall, and even worse if the aluminiun can plane was.
Also with the progress in drone tech could it have been possible the planes were controlled remotely?
Even if it was exactly as official, the response of attacking Saddam and not even sanctioning the Saudi's is bat shit crazy too.
1 it still fell really fast.
those pieces could have been impacted from above, giving them additional acceleration.
The construction must have been pretty shitty, if the fire was the cause of the fall, and even worse if the aluminiun can plane was.
Also with the progress in drone tech could it have been possible the planes were controlled remotely?
You can't see anything wrong with that picture?it's more than 14 years since it happened, why on earth are you still repeating this stuff?
grabbed the first relevant google image search i could find. there are plenty more for you to find on your own if you want.
i can't be bothered drawing on the image and re-uploading it, so words will have to do.
can you see the debris? see how it is out-pacing the upper structure that's driving the building's collapse? that is what is falling at free fall speed. quite obviously the upper part is not.
14 years ffs.
No truther past? Did you post this?there is no "debate". you're a nutter, and from time to time i bother to laugh at you.
lol, i have no truther past. but hey, points for using your own bullshit this time rather than just copying somebody else's
lol. either you're a ******* liar or you simply didn't understand the document. either option is possible, but the former is far more likely.
I provided you the link because you asked why would the USA do it?just read it
nothing in it
The aluminium would need to be very small in powder form - aluminium in larger pieces merely conducts heatI remember from fire fighting training in the military that alumium was set on fire in a gas flame and then we had to run in with water to put it out. When done the fire becomes even more immense.
So not sure what temperature exactly but from memory the danger temperature is only 600 degrees.
I would suggest flame from avaition fuel would exceed 1,000 degrees and any water sprinkler system would be an added disaster.
I provided you the link because you asked why would the USA do it?
This document is written by high ranking staff in the military and the bush administration
It provides you motive and the requirement - in their own words - for a cataclysmic event like Pearl Harbour
It doesn't necessarily prove anything but it answers your question.
The aluminium would need to be very small in powder form - aluminium in larger pieces merely conducts heat
I am no expert but black smoke says to me the fire was not so intense
Survivors managed to pass by the floors in question
Firefighters reported the fires could be put out
This really is all beyond a joke that such serious questions are of no interest
The commission report authors were pissed with the report and resources available to them.
No truther past? Did you post this?
"first, let's make one thing clear. conspiracy theories are my thing. i don't take my cues from "the MSM", and have spent an embarrassing, shameful amount of time learning all about the ones popularised since the advent of the 56k modem. ..."
No calling people liar, nutter is your thing
But then you leave evidence to the contrary
You look say any nonsense that comes to mind it seems
I suspect all this conspiracy chasing has made you confused
What is it you said you didn't say grasshopper?
I suggest you need to go back and delete your own posts
your comments and claimed facts go against the reports which claim the heat was intense, material was dripping from the above and the fact fire fighters couldn't put out the blaze (rather they used fire breaks).
Which begs the questionhahahaha!
none of that has anything to do with being a truther you imbecile. conspiracy theories are my thing- i know a whole lot more about the popular ones than your average guy. i didn't learn about them from "the MSM", and the amount i know about them and/or the time i've spent on idiots like you is embarrassing and shameful because you guys are ******* morons.
your inability to understand what you've quoted here is just a tiny example of your capacity for making accurate/reasonable inferences when parsing information.
as above. LOL
Tic for tacno way man! people were jumping from the towers because these were the cold kind of fires