beagle2
Team Captain
anyone have any vague idea of what the footy park land would be worth if it was subdivided for residential purposes?
Must be a huge!
About $200 mil according to a good source in the gov
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
anyone have any vague idea of what the footy park land would be worth if it was subdivided for residential purposes?
Must be a huge!
what would a new stadium cost?About $200 mil according to a good source in the gov
what would a new stadium cost?
cheers for the info$850 plus mil Same source
All stadiums lose money
cheers for the info
Surely building a stadium close to the city would be financially viable. Sure there will be a early hit but with the extra people in the city, staying in the city, spending money in the city it could work.
For mine its a short term loss for long term gain. The best thing about Melbourne during the season is the atmosphere in the city, people going about their business in the morning and then on mass all heading for the G or Dome.
but thats only taking into account the stadium itself.
What about all the extra revenue that will be brought into the city? When stuff like the police and fire games are on they are always carrying on about the cash injected into the city, what changes now?
Personally I would go to alot more games if they were in the city and most times I would make a day/night of it, as I think most people would.
minor detailHow is this going to pay the interest bill?
To give you an indication on how much an event can boost spending in the city...
When the Ashes were on, our familys shop's sales rose by nearly 30%. Thats huge.
ACC & the business council should start pushing for a new stadium, because they will be the ones reaping the rewards.]
BTW with the stadium, the federal government at a guess would contribute about 100 million for a new stadium. They gave 70 million odd to the SCG.
There are a lot of ways to pay for a new stadium - sale of the old one, state and federal contributions, new income streams, etc.
To give you an indication on how much an event can boost spending in the city...
When the Ashes were on, our familys shop's sales rose by nearly 30%. Thats huge.
ACC & the business council should start pushing for a new stadium, because they will be the ones reaping the rewards.]
BTW with the stadium, the federal government at a guess would contribute about 100 million for a new stadium. They gave 70 million odd to the SCG.
and that's the rub.
- sale of the old one requires planning and development approvals.
- state & federal contributions require plenty of political support
- new income streams... well there'd be some, but adelaide is not going to have a heap of super-boxes to pay for it all.
there's a lot of government support needed, and it's hard to see how something so superfluous is going to be a critical public need.
it's just not a real need - it's wanting to keep up with the jones's. the neighbours have something new, and now we need something too
you understand that there is actual tourism associated with an ashes tour - very different to Freo playing Adelaide in round 3. unless the barmy army have it in their calendar already
Adelaide as a city is too conservative for anything like this to ever happen.
I was stunned when I came back after six years to see that the LeCornu's site still didn't have anything on it - people in Adelaide just don't like change. Imagine if someone tried to get something like Federation Square happening in SA!
The main beneficiaries of a new stadium would be supporters and the downtown businesses of Adelaide. At the moment, tens of thousands of people travel to a sporting game, watch it, and leave. Actually putting the stadium somewhere vibrant would mean that people would stick around, and it would help revitalise the city.
There are a lot of ways to pay for a new stadium - sale of the old one, state and federal contributions, new income streams, etc.
Yeah, but what is the tourism? Maybe 500 people? They couldn't have been buying that many Balfours Frog Cakes themselves to make a 30% increase.
Lets get this straight. I realise we won't be getting a stadium for a while (10 plus years). HOWEVER we must start planning for a new stadium. Land, design and where the money is going to come from.
You have to remember SA is the only mainland state to have not hosted the Commonwealth Games....
A new stadium will be the centre peice of the renaissance of SA on the world stage, I personally can't wait.
This seems a pretty naive view of political priorities. You don't just fund critical needs, like hospitals and education, you also fund things that add to the quality of life in a community, such as arts funding and sports funding.
Clearly, moving the Crows to downtown in Adelaide would be of enormous quality of life impact to the tax payers - suddenly it is not just jump in the car, see a game and come home. It puts ten thousand people in the heart of the city for the whole day, where they'll eat, see a game, shop, drink, etc. They stay longer and they spend more. And if you can capture more of that money, you've increased income.
This is especially true in small economies. While stadiums may not have enormous impact in big, diverse cities (as has been seen over and over again) they do contribute enormously in smaller ones, such as the Packers in Green Bay. The impact of the Crows is pretty damn significant, and would benefit downtown Adelaide if the stadium was there.
Of course - it's not going to happen. It is too dramatic a change, and there would be too many blue hairs from Unley calling Leon Byner to complain.
that's fine. if you think the political priorities are as you say, then comeback run as an independent, and enjoy your new career as an MP.
quality of life issues, ignore the funding issues - which is always the downside of your political bent.
lets build a new stadium so people can overspend, overheat the economy, increase inflation, and generally set about inducing an economic recession. the handout economics of the arts are not the same ones that govern the wider community.
except for all the people who don't like footy, the people who would have to pay the taxes, the people who would have to lose out on public services, and the people who realised even the club doesn't support it. aside from all those people, the support would be overwhelming.
Lets get this straight. I realise we won't be getting a stadium for a while (10 plus years). HOWEVER we must start planning for a new stadium. Land, design and where the money is going to come from.
You have to remember SA is the only mainland state to have not hosted the Commonwealth Games....
A new stadium will be the centre peice of the renaissance of SA on the world stage, I personally can't wait.
Clearly, moving the Crows to downtown in Adelaide would be of enormous quality of life impact to the tax payers - suddenly it is not just jump in the car, see a game and come home. It puts ten thousand people in the heart of the city for the whole day, where they'll eat, see a game, shop, drink, etc. They stay longer and they spend more. And if you can capture more of that money, you've increased income.
10 years? The plus would even be a pipe dream.
The SANFL isn't going to spend upto $110 million upgrading Footy Park then only to see it go down the tubes in what is a relatively short time bulldoze it and start afresh. Besides we don't fill it now so building another and expecting to fill it is not reality.
There are much more needed infrastructure to be built than a sports stadium, ie schools, hospitals, light rail, roads, etc.
You'll be waiting for a long time. Richmond will even win a GF before we have a new stadium.