Adam Cooney or Brock McLean

Remove this Banner Ad

He has performed in finals. Alot of your players fell over when they finally got there this year.

While Cooney and McLean are both midfielders they play rather different roles and they both do them well. I'll of course stick with McLean. I don't know why supporters come in here with the Adcock crap when he has no part in this thread.
Well he mentioned best player from the 2003 draft.

I just joined the dots. :confused:
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What has Cooney done other than be picked number 1 in the national draft that has him so far ahead of Maclean.

He is clearly behind not only Maclean but Adcock also.

That is not the question you should ask! If you rate McLean so much higher than Coons then what has McLean done to be so far ahead of Cooney?

But in respect to your question
Mclean has played a couple of decent games nothing more, hes also injury prone.

While Cooney without a pre-season still manages to have a patch of 5 games during the middle of the season where he dominates. Give the KID a full pre-season and then judge him
 
While Cooney without a pre-season still manages to have a patch of 5 games during the middle of the season where he dominates. Give the KID a full pre-season and then judge him
So pretty much you want everyone to agree with you, but if they don't you remind them of this fact?

And you're the one that is asking the players to be judged. :confused:

I can tell you are going to last a long time around here.
 
That is not the question you should ask! If you rate McLean so much higher than Coons then what has McLean done to be so far ahead of Cooney?

But in respect to your question
Mclean has played a couple of decent games nothing more, hes also injury prone.
While Cooney without a pre-season still manages to have a patch of 5 games during the middle of the season where he dominates. Give the KID a full pre-season and then judge him

This just doesnt make sense.
 
Well he mentioned best player from the 2003 draft.

I just joined the dots. :confused:

Title of the thread:

"Adam Cooney or Brock McLean". No Adcock. McLean is better... but we won't be comparing them in this thread. :thumbsu:
 
Adcock is the best from that draft.

It's hard to choose between Cooney and Mclean. Inconsistent comes to mind for both players. Having said that, I'd take Mclean, just.
 
McLean is so so so overated its not funny. Cooney every day of the week and probably 3 times on sunday

So is your ability to spell. Your knowledge on football is rubbish at best.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Geez hate to not be perfect or have an opinion round here

It's tough isn't it? Don't worry, that feeling will pass. Keep talking up Cooney and then telling us all how he hasn't been able to do a pre-season when people don't agree with you.

You are doing fine. :thumbsu:
 
McLean is a much better midfielder than Adcock and I'd take that over Adcock's versitility.

He had an average year due to injuries. Watch McLean rip it up next year.
 
Theres been a hell of a lot of crap written here bout Cooney. Im supposed to believe Cooney isn't half the player of Adcock depsite Adcock having his best season in 07 and still getting less of the ball and far less goals. Sure stats ain't everything and there different players but why does Cooney get rated so harshly???? McLean struggled this year and the only newsworthy thing he did of note was get in trouble overseas

Cooney gets over 20 touches a game, runs with the ball, takes players on and over the last 2 years hes kicked more goals than any other midfielder. He kicked 28 this year, kicked 30 last year. How is that bad????

If Cooney was picked number 21 instead of one people would rave on about him. His output over his career has been the best from his draft
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Adam Cooney or Brock McLean

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top