I just see no definitive evidence from the whole thread. I see generalisations but no first hand evidence. When pressed for some, or indeed, some for the future, it's met with deaf ears. You are all using circular logic and inventive and personal attacks as your defence not looking at the issue at hand.
The reason I have on occassion written a few extra titbits that would incite Crows fans is to see whether they wanted to direct their attentions and supposed rebuttals to a few harsh words that mean nothing or actually engage with the underlying argument I have come up with.
[please note, this is the best way to see if someone truly wants to engage with argument and rhetoric on these sites. write some paragraphs addressing the argument and one or two bits to incite and if the rebuttals centre purely on the one or two bits of incite, then you know they are not interested in finding the truth of the argument]
Sadly, it is the former. There has been no rational discussion in the last few pages.
I point to asking, sincererly I might add, if we could start a thread just to Rucci's articles and both sides, Crows and Power dissect them to see if they are actually bias.
I was met with the moderator of this board, NN, to be called a schoolyard dare. This is the type of mentality you guys have. I ask for a resolution to the problem [one that actually might see me as wrong] and it is immediately dismissed guised as a personal attack.
If we look at this, this is the small minded mentality, tinged with paranoia and insecurity, something that Adelaide not just as a football club but as a city is rightly or wrongly well known for. I'm just glad the Power supporters aren't as fickle.
I come from a majority of Port Adelaide fans who saw the retirement fund scheme from last year or whenever as very soft. Now, it has escalated to this point where freedom of press could be comprised because Crows fans don't have it their way.
I say it again. Soft.
I also personally feel that if Rucci died tomorrow that you'd just find someone else to heap your displeasure upon.
The reason I have on occassion written a few extra titbits that would incite Crows fans is to see whether they wanted to direct their attentions and supposed rebuttals to a few harsh words that mean nothing or actually engage with the underlying argument I have come up with.
[please note, this is the best way to see if someone truly wants to engage with argument and rhetoric on these sites. write some paragraphs addressing the argument and one or two bits to incite and if the rebuttals centre purely on the one or two bits of incite, then you know they are not interested in finding the truth of the argument]
Sadly, it is the former. There has been no rational discussion in the last few pages.
I point to asking, sincererly I might add, if we could start a thread just to Rucci's articles and both sides, Crows and Power dissect them to see if they are actually bias.
I was met with the moderator of this board, NN, to be called a schoolyard dare. This is the type of mentality you guys have. I ask for a resolution to the problem [one that actually might see me as wrong] and it is immediately dismissed guised as a personal attack.
If we look at this, this is the small minded mentality, tinged with paranoia and insecurity, something that Adelaide not just as a football club but as a city is rightly or wrongly well known for. I'm just glad the Power supporters aren't as fickle.
I come from a majority of Port Adelaide fans who saw the retirement fund scheme from last year or whenever as very soft. Now, it has escalated to this point where freedom of press could be comprised because Crows fans don't have it their way.
I say it again. Soft.
I also personally feel that if Rucci died tomorrow that you'd just find someone else to heap your displeasure upon.