
Oscarman
Norm Smith Medallist








Insufficient intent
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 23
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The biggest problem with the rules is that we have so much grey area that foolish people talk about 'feel for the game' and 'common sense'. That's what opens up the game to inconsistency and even greater frustrationThe Ump has no feel for the game. Colossally dumb free. It wasn't like a deliberate ploy to delay the game (which should be penalised).
You could see the players frustration at the next bounce. Winds up the players and makes it a much harder game to officiate.
2 things
1) It's not about any other issue than the fact there is a rule in place. The rule was broken. End of. You can say you don't like the rule and that is fine but you can't just pretend it doesn't exist particularly after the publicity it got a month ago.
2) not that it matters but yes I played until I was thirty. But playing or not doesn't mean certain people can't have an opinion. I don't love the rule but it also doesnt ruin footy. Just hand it back to the umpire.
We know that when there is a free, if we dont give it back to tje other player its 50, how is this much different?
But again, it isn't about whether it's a good rule or not, it's about players being flat out dumb.
Imagine thinking people with a disability, or women who didn't have a competition to go on with don't get to have an opinion becayse 'they haven't played'.
You are embarrassing yourself on so many levels.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Officiating in this game has become a joke. Poor umpiring is now the standard.
Okay so you played, you should have some compassion for the players who now have 100 extra rules they need to follow compared to 10-15 years ago
We agree on most thingsWell we agree on something.
Don't think I've seen a worse quarter of officiating all year
Sorry the only foolish one here is the ump (and you since you took a shot at me).The biggest problem with the rules is that we have so much grey area that foolish people talk about 'feel for the game' and 'common sense'. That's what opens up the game to inconsistency and even greater frustration
Sorry the only foolish one here is the ump (and you since you took a shot at me).
What rule did he break? I'm sure there isn't a rule that says you have to give the ball straight back to the ump after a stoppage. It's not time wasting. The nearest I can see in the rules is "Failing to follow the instructions of an Umpire"
Sorry I'm not familiar with the Collingwood case you refer to. All I saw was a dumb decision in this game.This was all covered incredibly publically 4 or 6 weeks ago from the Collingwood game. Perhaps even the most basic of Googling will give you the answers you seek.
And you have the audacity to call anyone foolish. Please.
One of the great survivorsSeriously pointless unit Tom Campbell.
If anyone could explain it to me I'd be much obliged
Sorry the only foolish one here is the ump (and you since you took a shot at me).
What rule did he break? I'm sure there isn't a rule that says you have to give the ball straight back to the ump after a stoppage. It's not time wasting. The nearest I can see in the rules is "Failing to follow the instructions of an Umpire"
Ok so you came in totally ignorant and made grandiose statements without knowing what you were talking about. Embarrassing.Sorry I'm not familiar with the Collingwood case you refer to. All I saw was a dumb decision in this game.
Glad you aren't an umpire. There would be 300 free kicks a game.
My humble apologies for not knowing such details. I'm in awe of your knowledge and pedantry.Ok so you came in totally ignorant and made grandiose statements without knowing what you were talking about. Embarrassing.
My humble apologies for not knowing such details. I'm in awe of your knowledge and pedantry.