Some of us were on the Swans before Franklin was named.
Oh and thanks for your tip, else no one else here would have had the balls to go for Hawthorn last night.
let's be honest, swans were never a chance regardless of buddy's status.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Some of us were on the Swans before Franklin was named.
Oh and thanks for your tip, else no one else here would have had the balls to go for Hawthorn last night.
let's be honest, swans were never a chance regardless of buddy's status.
not sure if serious!Some of us were on the Swans before Franklin was named.
Oh and thanks for your tip, else no one else here would have had the balls to go for Hawthorn last night.
balanced by his 4 goals. Clangers arent so bad when you kick them out on the full deep in your forward 50.not sure if serious!
buddy was a liability and it would have been 50+ without him. check his first half clangers.
I didnt know it was goodes 300th, on monday, when i did my bets and had hawks over 39.5 at good odds and if it wasnt goods 300th they wouldnt of evan came back in the 2nd half! that was the sole reason they fought it out and hawks slacked off a little also, like against carlton perhaps?(not sure)balanced by his 4 goals. Clangers arent so bad when you kick them out on the full deep in your forward 50.
LOL. Are you Ferris?I didnt know it was goodes 300th, on monday, when i did my bets and had hawks over 39.5 at good odds and if it wasnt goods 300th they wouldnt of evan came back in the 2nd half! that was the sole reason they fought it out and hawks slacked off a little also, like against carlton perhaps?(not sure)
but Hale at the end - AT LEAST HAVE A CRACK YOU BIG MORON, WHERE WAS THE RUNNER ALSO ?! comedy of an error
Are you ****ing serious?!IMO it tipped it in the favour of under 39.5 like baywatch posted and i conceded just before the game bstarted, was a decent bet.
you cant tell me they didnt lift for goods in the 2nd half? ? the match was effectively over just like against carlton!!!!!!
swans have a strong culture and his 300th was a massive event for that club, Goodes was preaching to them in the huddle to not let him down
edit replying to question
didnt mean to upset. and its just my opinion. They never had anything to loose, though I conceed it wasnt the only reason they reduced the margin.they would have lifted because it was a ****ing knockout final and they had nothing to lose at half time, not because it was adam goodes' ****ing 300th
jesus christ
IMO it tipped it in the favour of under 39.5 like baywatch posted and i conceded just before the game bstarted, was a decent bet.
you cant tell me they didnt lift for goods in the 2nd half? ? the match was effectively over just like against carlton!!!!!!
swans have a strong culture and his 300th was a massive event for that club, Goodes was preaching to them in the huddle to not let him down
edit replying to question
didnt mean to upset. and its just my opinion. They never had anything to loose, though I conceed it wasnt the only reason they reduced the margin.
see David Hale
i wouldn't call a chance to win a premiership nothing to lose but each to their own.
Your quote is part of the reason Carlton have no chance tonight
Eagles 60+ @9.00
Qstick most goals @15.00
Embley most disposals @9.00
LOL like it Go big or go home