AFL pulls plug on Chris Judd's controversial third-party deal with Visy

[Ron The Bear]

But ex-Tigers president Bond was a convicted criminal; neither of these Carlton ex-presidents are

You went for the cheese ... and failed! LOL. Unfortunately for you, the Tigers are the only club with an actual convicted criminal ex-prez. Pies have a ex vice-prez convicted crim if that make you feels any better.

But unlike what occurred at Carlton, Bond was forced out before presiding over a single game, and was replaced by a man of integrity (Neville Crowe).

 

[the_interloper]

John Nicholls, Karl Norman and Laurence Angwin were Presidents of the CFC?

That's news to me.

My post was in reply to your post :-

My point is that your club has a history of being infested with criminal activity (hell they were the only club to be mentioned on the original Underbelly!). You reap what you sow bro, just remember that.

 

[the_interloper]

But ex-Tigers president Bond was a convicted criminal; neither of these Carlton ex-presidents are

You went for the cheese ... and failed! LOL. Unfortunately for you, the Tigers are the only club with an actual convicted criminal ex-prez. Pies have a ex vice-prez convicted crim if that make you feels any better.

You fail for not removing the watermark! And if Dick Pratt (an apt christian name if ever I heard one) would have been convicted you can be sure of that! Unfortunately (for him not us) he dropped off the twig before he could be. And I'm guessing you're racist like John Elliott, fancy taking the piss out of all Aboriginal/black footballers with such a disrespectful Bigfooty name!

 

[mediumsizered]

But unlike what occurred at Carlton, Bond was forced out before presiding over a single game, and was replaced by a man of integrity (Neville Crowe).

Such a shame Richmond's current club president was involved in the issuing of a misleading prospectus for the company of which he was a director & subsequently had to pay compensation to investors for said act & his predecessor reached an out of court settlement with Ben Holland in relation to business & investment opportunities that were not delivered by said club president. Said club president was also in dispute with 3 other Richmond players in relation to investments. Last time I looked the club president involved in the issue of the said misleading prospectus has not been "forced out".

 

[Ron The Bear]

Such a shame Richmond's current club president was involved in the issuing of a misleading prospectus for the company of which he was a director & subsequently had to pay compensation to investors for said act & his predecessor reached an out of court settlement with Ben Holland in relation to business & investment opportunities that were not delivered by said club president. Said club president was also in dispute with 3 other Richmond players in relation to investments. Last time I looked the club president involved in the issue of the said misleading prospectus has not been "forced out".

Yeah I believe March was one of seven respondents who together forked out ~$3m in settlement. Didn't shirk the issue by declaring bankrupt a la Elliott. Suspect Damian Barrett the feral **** or one of his family members lost money there. And Ben Holland, the mercenary? Don't make me laugh...

 

[Monkey King]

You fail for not removing the watermark! And if Dick Pratt (an apt christian name if ever I heard one) would have been convicted you can be sure of that! Unfortunately (for him not us) he dropped off the twig before he could be.

LOL. What a derp! I actually chose the watermark as it obscured the dead animal.

But again, you are wrong on all counts. The DPP's case fell over after the judge ruled their only piece of evidence inadmissible and they dropped the charge before dear old Dick passed away.

Can you get nothing right?

And I'm guessing you're racist like John Elliott, fancy taking the piss out of all Aboriginal/black footballers with such a disrespectful Bigfooty name!

Wow! Shows what a lunatic you are, firstly by being casting a racist slur on our indigenous brothers and then furthering this by slighting a Chinese cultural figure in the same motion. Your ignorance truly knows no bounds.

 

[Monkey King]

But unlike what occurred at Carlton, Bond was forced out before presiding over a single game, and was replaced by a man of integrity (Neville Crowe).

That's actually irrelevant. Fact for fact, Richmond remains the only club with an ex-prez sporting a criminal conviction. That he resigned in face of supporter resistance to his idea of rebranding you lot up to Brisbane is next to irrelevant. I'm sure Pratt would have suffered the same fate had he shown such disrespect to the club.

 

[partylikeits1990]

As a Collingwood supporter are you happy that Richard Pratt's son in law has donated $10 mill to Collingwood over the last couple of years. Money he earned as part of the Pratt family and VISY.

You know money taken from every day Australians courtesy of a modern day sociopath as you like to call him.

Woah......easy now. I don't have a problem with Pratt, how he attained his cash or any of the decisions he made in his life and I respect him for the good he TRIED to do at the Blues. I was merely responding to a misleading and/or uninformed post by a Carlton supporter in this thread. Having consumed a Carlton Draught or two myself I may have gone a bit overboard.

 

[Ron The Bear]

That's actually irrelevant. Fact for fact, Richmond remains the only club with an ex-prez sporting a criminal conviction.

Then you might want to contribute to Bondy's Wiki page as his brief association with Richmond doesn't seem to be important enough to rate a mention.

 

[mediumsizered]

Then you might want to contribute to Bondy's Wiki page as his brief association with Richmond doesn't seem to be important enough to rate a mention.

That probably says more about Richmond than Bondy. The page obviously only details the noteworthy aspects of Bond's life.

 

[Ron The Bear]

That probably says more about Richmond than Bondy. The page obviously only details the noteworthy aspects of Bond's life.

The only Carlton president whose portrait does not adorn the walls of the club is John McInerney. Having ordered illegal player payments to be concealed on the club's balance sheet, is it true that all images of him were destroyed?

Carlton FC - cheating for a hundred years and counting.

 

[the_interloper]

LOL. What a derp! I actually chose the watermark as it obscured the dead animal.

But again, you are wrong on all counts. The DPP's case fell over after the judge ruled their only piece of evidence inadmissible and they dropped the charge before dear old Dick passed away.

Can you get nothing right?

You disgust me mate, first you post pics of a dirty, innocent dead animal and then claim you were trying to censor it for our benefit. And yeah right you picked a watermark for it, how stupid do you think I am? (That's a rhetorical question by the way, if you know what that means).

And I also believe that the DPP at the time said something along the lines of "there was 100% chance of a conviction for price fixing (for Pratt)." What an old prick he was, cheating all of us so he can continue to have his mistresses and betray his family, what a terrible role model he was.

Wow! Shows what a lunatic you are, firstly by being casting a racist slur on our indigenous brothers and then furthering this by slighting a Chinese cultural figure in the same motion. Your ignorance truly knows no bounds.

I'm going to make a guess and say that the indigenous community would want no part of a flog like you. Plus you're having a go at Asians now, do you hate all people different to yourself?

 

[gbatman]

This is all the AFL's problem, they have allowed it and made it a part of the player's allowances, if they want to put a stop to a players third party deal before their contract expires and go ahead and do it then that player aught to sue the AFL. You would think that if they stoped a players third party deal while they are contracted than that player is well within their rights to sue.

 

[FredLeDeux]

This is all the AFL's problem, they have allowed it and made it a part of the player's allowances, if they want to put a stop to a players third party deal before their contract expires and go ahead and do it then that player aught to sue the AFL. You would think that if they stoped a players third party deal while they are contracted than that player is well within their rights to sue.

They ain't stopped it, they ain't gonna stop it, they can't stop it.
And it's expired anyway.
Hope that puts your mind at rest.

 

[Monkey King]

Then you might want to contribute to Bondy's Wiki page as his brief association with Richmond doesn't seem to be important enough to rate a mention.

I thought it was there ... damn, Bondy must have edited it out through the embarrassment of association

 

[gbatman]

They ain't stopped it, they ain't gonna stop it, they can't stop it.
And it's expired anyway.
Hope that puts your mind at rest.

what about the hundreds of other ones?

 

[FredLeDeux]

what about the hundreds of other ones?

I assume by hundreds you mean the 78.
Same answer; they ain't stopped 'em. they ain't gonna stop 'em, and they can't stop 'em.
And they've checked them and they're legal.

 

[Monkey King]

I'm going to make a guess and say that the indigenous community would want no part of a flog like you. Plus you're having a go at Asians now, do you hate all people different to yourself?

This is not Bay 13 in case you've mistaken where you're posting. You've been pulled up for your racist inferences; if I were you, I'd just take my cap in hand and leave it at that if I were you. Why on earth you see the word monkey and think indigenous person is beyond me. I don't even want to understand cultural backwaters such as yourself. You make my skin crawl.

 

[Baldur]

Which is where the problem lies, why should something be included in TPP if it is fair and reasonable (this is where the arguement is for Judd-Visy Deal) compensation for services renderedwhihc has nothing to do with playing football?

Would Judd have the Visy job if he did not play football for Carlton? Are the services rendered suitable for the monies paid. The AFL appears to have decided No & No.

 

[the_interloper]

This is not Bay 13 in case you've mistaken where you're posting. You've been pulled up for your racist inferences; if I were you, I'd just take my cap in hand and leave it at that if I were you. Why on earth you see the word monkey and think indigenous person is beyond me. I don't even want to understand cultural backwaters such as yourself. You make my skin crawl.

Ok so if you think monkey isn't offensive to an Aboriginal go up to one and call him that and see what happens! (Hope you can run quick!) And I don't believe a person can be called a "cultural backwater", I may be wrong but you might want to check what such offensive slurs you use mean before you start throwing them around.

 

[FredLeDeux]

Would Judd have the Visy job if he did not play football for Carlton? Are the services rendered suitable for the monies paid. The AFL appears to have decided No & No.

They appear to have come to the same conclusion as everyone else in the Southern Hemisphere (except for a few die-hard Blues fans on here - and in their heart of hearts they know the AFL has finally got it right this time).

 

[Bosun]

Ok so if you think monkey isn't offensive to an Aboriginal go up to one and call him that and see what happens! (Hope you can run quick!) And I don't believe a person can be called a "cultural backwater", I may be wrong but you might want to check what such offensive slurs you use mean before you start throwing them around.

The word Monkey is not offensive, placed in context where it is said to a negro, aborginal etc it would be. Said poster has a forum username containing the work money, I cannot see any instances where he has used it in a racially offensive manner. It says more about you that you could reference his user name to being a racist, the more worrying aspect is your thought and understanding patterns. Truly frightening actually, seek help.

 

[Monkey King]

Ok so if you think monkey isn't offensive to an Aboriginal go up to one and call him that and see what happens!

You've lost the plot sunshine. This doesn't even make sense. Indigenous people are not offended by the word monkey unless you link it directly to them or their race - something of which you alone have done here. And like most of your ilk, you're obviously completely unaware of how offensive your word association really is. I bet in your twisted mind you believe your racist association is actually some kind of advocacy. Like I said, racist dogs like you make my skin crawl.

 

[jonoman89]

Carlton will be compliant and won't try anything of the sort. They are still recovering from the last time the AFL tore them a new arseh*le.

See the "breach the TPP part". If the AFL makes a ruling which sees us breach the cap we'll be heavily fined, we'd have no option but to litigate.

Luckily it doesn't look like it's going down that road.