Cousin Jed
Retired President of BigFooty
I could not agree with the above more. Polks has shown himself to be a ripping overhead mark, great lead and a reliable set shot. While everyone was screaming for him to get a run in the midfield, I can't see the logic in not developing a natural to play a position they are so well suited to.
Staker puts himself into good position. He makes a contest. These things are good. But I argue that Polks would have provided just as many leads, would've held onto more marks and would have kicked a number of the set shots Staker missed. Perhaps I am blinded by my bias towards the kid, but I think he really is a better option.
Fully agreed. Like Adcock down back, sure it would be nice if they could play full time in the middle, but why change something that works. Polkinghorne is a mediocre midfielder who doesn't offer a whole lot. As a lead up forward he offers us something good.