Here are some observations I notated
1. Adelaide needed NT to get initial licence as considered biggest gamble due to lack of playing strength.
2. Helped make AFL feel more inclusive having NT in competition
3. Initially NT had 1/3 players based in Darwin year 1
4. Year 2 1/5
5. Year 3 1/6
6. Only Danielle Ponter residing in NT now
7. Players voted with feet
8. VFLW were unhappy and legislated against Adelaide based Crows in NT Thunder rather than 12 AFLW players permitted to play. Limited Adelaide numbers in mid season.
9. Rumour that AFLW HQ and some other clubs were unhappy that Adelaide a juggernaut
10. Adelaide likely to lose NT Government funding.
11. Possible less costs without NT base and camps and flights
12. More centralised program
13. Possible NT alignment with Gold Coast
14. A void to fill for Adelaide players in winter post AFLW season
15. Lets talk to Williamstown in VFLW
1. Adelaide needed NT to get initial licence as considered biggest gamble due to lack of playing strength.
2. Helped make AFL feel more inclusive having NT in competition
3. Initially NT had 1/3 players based in Darwin year 1
4. Year 2 1/5
5. Year 3 1/6
6. Only Danielle Ponter residing in NT now
7. Players voted with feet
8. VFLW were unhappy and legislated against Adelaide based Crows in NT Thunder rather than 12 AFLW players permitted to play. Limited Adelaide numbers in mid season.
9. Rumour that AFLW HQ and some other clubs were unhappy that Adelaide a juggernaut
10. Adelaide likely to lose NT Government funding.
11. Possible less costs without NT base and camps and flights
12. More centralised program
13. Possible NT alignment with Gold Coast
14. A void to fill for Adelaide players in winter post AFLW season
15. Lets talk to Williamstown in VFLW